Beyond the Line

Why does the U.S. soldier have a Russian helmet? Lame.

Did you have any technical advisors? 3 RAF Mitchel Mk.1 to drop airborne troops, I don't think so. Attacked by Junker 88's, nope already retired by then plus they were dive bombers.

Totally phony, example.....when they show the automatic weapons firing the charging handle is not moving. They could have at least used blank bullets. You could tell they were not firing the guns for real. Took took the excitement out of the movie.

Absolute amateurish, no storyline, just a walk in the forest, as WW2 military adversaries. It was so hick the only thing missing were the characters making their own machine gun sounds!

Unfortunately this movie did not deliver on ANY level. The plot was potentially a good one about the closing days of WW2 in Europe but the weak story line and wooden actors were doomed from the start. The cast was very small with each playing multiple roles and they simply could not carry it off. The SFX were third rate which was right on par with every other aspect of this movie.

If you can find the strength to sit through the movie, take an extra 3 minutes to read the closing credits that will acknowledge the endeavours of the entire family of the writer/producer/director (Jason Mills). Talk about keeping it in the family! There was way too much "Drone" footage and it transpires that the Drone was owned by another family member (probably an xmas gift). In summary this creation had no redeeming features and it is to be avoided at all costs!