A Ring for Christmas

If anything, it's the equivalent of a ring that has patches of beauty but has too many patches of ugliness. That is not being said with no malice, despite not being taken by the premise part of me did want to like this. Most of 2020's Christmas output (whether Hallmark, Lifetime or other) was a very mixed one, with no film that was exceptional but very few were also terrible. Most ranged between mediocre and decent, but there were some that fell into the extremes of good and bad.

'A Ring for Christmas' is one of the 2020 Christmas films that fell into the bad extreme. It has a few good things, though they were more just above moderate good things rather than massive, but they are vastly outweighed by the bad things. And sadly the worst of the bad things are executed absolutely awfully. Other than the production values not being too bad all things considered and a couple of decent performances, 'A Ring for Christmas' was pretty difficult to sit through.

The good things shall be mentioned first. The best thing about it is the performance of Dean Geyer, who is very amiable as the one interesting and rootable character in the entire film. Despite being criminally underused, Michael Gross does make much of little and made me smile.

Production values show some degree of professionalism and don't look cheap. Parts of the music were pleasant.

When it comes to the praise, that is pretty much it. The rest of the acting is awful. On one extreme, we have Kate McGarrigle overacting to an embarrassing degree, this kind of scenery chewing wouldn't pass for guilty pleasure fun but merely annoying. On the other extreme, we have Liliana Tandon completely cold and bland lead performance that has so little emotion or committment. There is no chemistry between the actors, what there was felt made up on the spot, and Gabe is the only character that is worth caring for. Everybody else bored and irritated me and Gross is not in it enough to compensate, despite him being pretty good.

In regard to the central relationship, that was on the practically endangered species side. Tandon and Geyer are so disconnected from each other and the relationship itself in the writing goes nowhere for most of the time until rushing it through in the contrived and too pat final quarter. The script throughout is truly awkward and very stilted in a verbose way. Almost like a hastily written first draft not checked through. The story never grabbed me with a very dull first half, which felt slow, over-stretched and uneventful. When it picks up marginally too late, it's very contrived and the whole film has no warmth or charm, no nothing. The direction is routine at best and is often disorganised and hesitant.

Bottom line, not good at all. 3/10.

A Ring For Christmas (2020)-

We all know that I only watched this film for Dean Geyer and that's probably the case for a number of other viewers too.

I just loved him as Brody in 'Glee' and that cute, perfect smile, Swoon!

It was therefore such a shame that he didn't get the support of a decent cast and direction. Some of the others actors are actual, full on caricatures of humans and some quite vile.

I would have turned it off after 3 minutes if I hadn't known Dean was going to be in it. His character, Gabe, is way too nice for her and that's putting it mildly.

It could have been a good story if it hadn't been for the silly marriage element or the bratty rich kid thing. Maybe they should have picked one, but not both. I really didn't like her as an actress or her character and not just because I'm jealous of how close to Dean she was able to be, although that is definitely a factor.

The story jumps ahead in places without a proper script to move it forwards, just when you think that they are going to show you what they've just talked about, they are already the next step ahead and that bit is forgotten.

I'm pretty sure that her other potential fella, Tyler, was having an affair with the obviously gay bar man.

There was also a bit too much charity work going on for it to be realistic, which proves what a cynical and horrible world we live in, but no one can possibly give so much. As a result the warmth about those thoughtful ideas seems to get lost. Most of these films try to make that the moral of the story, while the romance happens around it, but they focussed too hard on the romance and just used the meaningful acts to push it on and too quickly for me.

There was real snow for a change, but not a huge amount of Christmas, at least to start with, but I have to say that it did grow on me, which combined with Dean is the only reason it scores so high.

6.24ish?/10.

Granted I watched it just to see the scenes of my Newburyport (and they were beautiful as the city is) but I really did not expect it to be as bad as it was. Terrible script, truly awful acting. How desperate for money would Lorraine Bracco have had to be to be involved in this? It made all the dreck on Hallmark and Lifetime look like great cinema.

This was hard to watch. Not terrible, but the lead actress was not believable. Gabe was the only one that was believable. He looked better than the supposed athletic jock.

The story is a bit unusual, but it is a marriage of convenience story. The lead female is a bit of a spoiled debutante, so mom cuts her off, abruptly. However, Angie discovers she can inherit a trust fund if she marries. There's a problem with the basic assumptions which create some inconsistency. The first scenes intentionally try to show how much of a spoiled spendthrift, Angie is. Then the entire rest of the movie, Angie is intelligent, generous and even at times diligent and industrious. Her attitude wavers back and forth from a little spoiled to a lot generous. Beyond that inconsistency, the story is awkward at times. Conversations. Situations. It's like everyone is trying too hard.

The eventual romantic outcome is obvious almost from the moment Angie returns home. These two have decent chemistry at times. Almost all of the acting is bad. Liliana Tandon is inconsistent - again, it seems like she is trying to hard to make up for lack of experience and natural talent. Paulette, the friend, is too over-the-top greedy. Lorraine Bracco almost slurs her words at times. Dean Geyer is decent, but there's too little of him.

I said the outcome is obvious, but there were a couple of fun bumps getting there.

There's a side story of Angie working with kids at school. There's some sweet moments, but it's too disconnected from the rest of the story. There is a very cute and funny scene with kids helping her practice for an interview.

I would have liked to see this story executed better including resolving some of the clumsiness in the plot. The basic idea has potential and Angie can be an appealing character. There's some definite pluses. There's obvious minuses. Let's put it this way - I could see myself watching this again next year.

Regarding rating and review distributions, something is hinky. Three 10 star reviews are the only one from that reviewer. And for ratings, the quantity of 10 stars outnumbers everything but the median rating. These together imply ballot box stuffing. My advice is ignore the short, nonspecific reviews and give this movie a chance.