Após ter seu lar conquistado pelos imperadores tirânicos que agora comandam Roma, Lucius é forçado a entrar no Coliseu e deve olhar para o seu passado para encontrar força para devolver a gl... Ler tudoApós ter seu lar conquistado pelos imperadores tirânicos que agora comandam Roma, Lucius é forçado a entrar no Coliseu e deve olhar para o seu passado para encontrar força para devolver a glória de Roma ao seu povo.Após ter seu lar conquistado pelos imperadores tirânicos que agora comandam Roma, Lucius é forçado a entrar no Coliseu e deve olhar para o seu passado para encontrar força para devolver a glória de Roma ao seu povo.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
- Indicado a 1 Oscar
- 9 vitórias e 110 indicações no total
Resumo
Reviewers say 'Gladiator II' impresses with visuals and performances, especially Denzel Washington and Pedro Pascal, but falls short in emotional depth and originality. The grand scale, action sequences, and themes of power and redemption are praised, yet the script is criticized for predictability and underdeveloped characters. Paul Mescal's performance is deemed lacking compared to Russell Crowe's, and the film's reliance on CGI and historical inaccuracies is noted.
Avaliações em destaque
The biggest problem with this movie is that it's essentially a soft reboot. If you've seen the first one, you'll quickly realize that you're watching something you've already seen. And once something becomes a repetition of something great, it's almost impossible to recapture that same level of greatness. Mescal, Washington, and the rest of the cast do their best, but this movie relies heavily on nostalgia. For the most part, it repeats the structure of the original story and follows all the clichés typical of sword-and-sandal films: the plot, the betrayal, the arena fights-you name it. The irony is that people who haven't seen the first one will probably enjoy this movie far more than those who remember the original.
The film offers a thrilling experience, the narrative and character development could have been more robust. At times, the storyline feels rushed, and some character arcs lack the depth that made the original "Gladiator" so compelling. This leads to an overall experience that, in my opinion, does not quite reach the heights of the original.
Additionally, Denzel Washington's portrayal is noteworthy, but his American accent felt somewhat out of place within the context of the film. It occasionally detracted from the immersion, making it harder to connect with his character fully.
To sum it up, "Gladiator II" is an entertaining blockbuster that delivers on visual spectacle and excitement. While it struggles with certain aspects of storytelling and character depth, it still manages to provide an enjoyable cinematic experience for fans of the genre.
Additionally, Denzel Washington's portrayal is noteworthy, but his American accent felt somewhat out of place within the context of the film. It occasionally detracted from the immersion, making it harder to connect with his character fully.
To sum it up, "Gladiator II" is an entertaining blockbuster that delivers on visual spectacle and excitement. While it struggles with certain aspects of storytelling and character depth, it still manages to provide an enjoyable cinematic experience for fans of the genre.
Visuals are stunning, sets and costumes look reach and amazing. Pedro Pascal is great in every scene, he's really selling all the emotions with such subtlety and minimalim. And that's about it what I've found good here.
Main actor is one of the huge problems, he always looks pale, like he is not really acting and has no real emotions. He was supposed to grab our hearts from scene one, however it somehow didn't happen. Film lacks some more time at the begining for the audiance to meet and fall in love with him, so that his motivations are more believeble and his story be more emotionally relatable.
Another huge issue is the story that goes everywhere, plot of Denzel Washington's character is just bizzare and bloated, diallogues are shallow in general...
I expected worse, but anyhow this movie left me feel numb...
Main actor is one of the huge problems, he always looks pale, like he is not really acting and has no real emotions. He was supposed to grab our hearts from scene one, however it somehow didn't happen. Film lacks some more time at the begining for the audiance to meet and fall in love with him, so that his motivations are more believeble and his story be more emotionally relatable.
Another huge issue is the story that goes everywhere, plot of Denzel Washington's character is just bizzare and bloated, diallogues are shallow in general...
I expected worse, but anyhow this movie left me feel numb...
Everyone has seen Denzel Washington praising fellow actors Pedro Pascal and Paul Mescal for their acting - but the reality is there is nothing special - they are actors that acted - their performance did not elevate the film to the glory of the original.
Storyline wise the film is a joke - the plot twists are illogical and only work because the characters are forced to change - the first half of the film concentrates on a man's desire for vengence which is overturned by a single line of dialogue.
Hollywood is failing - it clearly looks to have been influenced by accountants and MBA muppets that somehow believe the more twists a film contains the more $$ it attracts.
Side note: if Rome was so great - why was it always falling apart.
Storyline wise the film is a joke - the plot twists are illogical and only work because the characters are forced to change - the first half of the film concentrates on a man's desire for vengence which is overturned by a single line of dialogue.
Hollywood is failing - it clearly looks to have been influenced by accountants and MBA muppets that somehow believe the more twists a film contains the more $$ it attracts.
Side note: if Rome was so great - why was it always falling apart.
I approached this movie truly trying to give it a fair change on its own by not holding and comparing it too much to its original, But this movie just pulls of a force awakens and has 80% just recycled nostalgia bait its impossible to not compare them.
It recycles quotes,plot, narratives, even very same camera shots.
And yeah,alas, the first did absolutely everything, every single aspect better to much better and most definitely story/drama character wise.
Even though tis definitely not the worst movie ever,far from.
But this movie kind of symbolize the state of current Hollywood and how much it has declined over the last few decades.
The fact so many people praising it confirms a bitter reality. Story and plot just don't matter or at least much less then it used to, people are pleased and satisfied as long they see pretty pictures and are not bored!
This movie definitely looks glorious and expensive and had a big grandeur(although some CGI looked comically fake), but it fails to have a coherent driven plot.
In the first movie every scene absolutely mattered, even during battles, characters spoke by their actions and where very consistent in how the character was portrayed,who where gratefully fleshed out
This script ( from the same writer as that abominable napoleon movie) things feel random and forced.
Also Battles feeling quite meh, nothing feels deserved or earned..
pity, as acting was well though ,all where good to great acting performances wich makes it even more of a pity the story was so weak.
It recycles quotes,plot, narratives, even very same camera shots.
And yeah,alas, the first did absolutely everything, every single aspect better to much better and most definitely story/drama character wise.
Even though tis definitely not the worst movie ever,far from.
But this movie kind of symbolize the state of current Hollywood and how much it has declined over the last few decades.
The fact so many people praising it confirms a bitter reality. Story and plot just don't matter or at least much less then it used to, people are pleased and satisfied as long they see pretty pictures and are not bored!
This movie definitely looks glorious and expensive and had a big grandeur(although some CGI looked comically fake), but it fails to have a coherent driven plot.
In the first movie every scene absolutely mattered, even during battles, characters spoke by their actions and where very consistent in how the character was portrayed,who where gratefully fleshed out
This script ( from the same writer as that abominable napoleon movie) things feel random and forced.
Also Battles feeling quite meh, nothing feels deserved or earned..
pity, as acting was well though ,all where good to great acting performances wich makes it even more of a pity the story was so weak.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesIn an interview with Simon Mayo, Sir Ridley Scott said that he sold the Cruzada (2005) set to the Moroccan government for $10 because it was cheaper than dismantling it. He then had to hire it from the same government for use in this movie.
- Erros de gravaçãoNaval battles were only staged in the first year after the Colosseum was built. After the construction of the Hypogeum it was no longer possible to flood the arena.
- Versões alternativasA cut M-rated version was released in cinemas in Australia. At least 3 scenes were trimmed: Cut No. 1 - Lucius (Paul Mescal) beheads his opponent at the first Roman games. The beginning of the scene was trimmed to remove the swords connecting with the head. It cuts into the shot midway to show the stump and a bit of blood spray. Cut No. 2 - Macrinus (Denzel Washington) slashing at the neck of Emperor Geta (Joseph Quinn). The initial long shot of the neck cutting and blood spray is missing. The following close-up shot is zoomed to the left to remove the continued neck slashing and blood spray on the right. Cut No. 3 - Macrinus puts a spike into the ear of Emperor Caracalla (Fred Hechinger). The red blood flowing from his ear is now green/yellow. Despite these cuts, the edited version was later reclassified as MA15+. The initial M rating was given by the studio itself, whereas the MA15+ rating was given by the Australian classification board. It is currently unknown if the uncut version will be released on Australian home video.
- ConexõesEdited into Gladiator II: Deleted Scenes (2025)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Gladiator II?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 250.000.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 172.438.016
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 55.034.715
- 24 de nov. de 2024
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 462.180.717
- Tempo de duração2 horas 28 minutos
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 2.39 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente