Em um mundo devastado por zumbis, uma esperta adolescente e seu protetor lutam para sobreviver, enfrentando perigos implacáveis e testando os limites da esperança e da lealdade.Em um mundo devastado por zumbis, uma esperta adolescente e seu protetor lutam para sobreviver, enfrentando perigos implacáveis e testando os limites da esperança e da lealdade.Em um mundo devastado por zumbis, uma esperta adolescente e seu protetor lutam para sobreviver, enfrentando perigos implacáveis e testando os limites da esperança e da lealdade.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Resumo
Reviewers say 'Silent Zone' provides a moderately engaging experience with solid performances and moments of tension, though it doesn't reinvent the zombie genre. The film's gritty realism and atmospheric setting are praised, but uneven pacing and underdeveloped characters are noted as drawbacks. Despite some clichés and slow segments, the movie's competent execution and emotional depth make it a worthwhile watch for genre fans.
Avaliações em destaque
Everything that needs to be in a film of this genre is present in Silent Zone: a simple plot, intense action, hordes of the undead, and a mad scientist.
However: The acting is bad, the dialogue is dull, and the fight scenes are so poorly executed that I actually laughed out loud at times. The director clearly didn't have an armorer on set. The way the actors handle firearms is comical, and the amount of muzzle flash is ridiculously unrealistic. The tension of traveling through the remnants of civilization is nonexistent. The characters don't fit together, they are underdeveloped, and they left no impression on me.
To sum up: The framework of this film could serve as a starting point for writing a script for any movie in this genre. Silent Zone is a failure only because it didn't have enough funding.
However: The acting is bad, the dialogue is dull, and the fight scenes are so poorly executed that I actually laughed out loud at times. The director clearly didn't have an armorer on set. The way the actors handle firearms is comical, and the amount of muzzle flash is ridiculously unrealistic. The tension of traveling through the remnants of civilization is nonexistent. The characters don't fit together, they are underdeveloped, and they left no impression on me.
To sum up: The framework of this film could serve as a starting point for writing a script for any movie in this genre. Silent Zone is a failure only because it didn't have enough funding.
Silent Zone is a solid movie. My only gripe is a few slow parts. It's not a high budget movie but they did good for whatever amount they had to work with. Some of the other reviews are unjustly harsh. A 4, 5 or 6 star rating is correct for this one anything higher or lower is unfair. Except for a few slow parts it was quite entertaining and holds your attention. I liked how the zombies were able to "think" to a degree. It gave a nice twist on the zombie genre. The acting is not exceptional by any means but it is passable except for a couple moments of cringy acting. I probably wouldn't watch a second time but I do not regret watching once.
If you like zombie movies, you will like this movie. It is well above average for this genre.
The country of origin is given as Hungary, but some of this movie definitely looked like the Chernobyl restricted zone. Either way, the locations were good, the big wide angle shots were well done, the camera work was excellent. This does not look like a cheap, low budget movie.
There was character development, not a lot, but enough to keep you interested. The acting was for the most part good, especially the leading characters. Some of the secondary parts, with only a few lines, did come off as amateurish, but mostly quite professional.
It's not great or outstanding, and I will probably never watch it again, but I felt it was well worth my time on a lazy afternoon.
Overall: Above average zombie movie, recommended.
The country of origin is given as Hungary, but some of this movie definitely looked like the Chernobyl restricted zone. Either way, the locations were good, the big wide angle shots were well done, the camera work was excellent. This does not look like a cheap, low budget movie.
There was character development, not a lot, but enough to keep you interested. The acting was for the most part good, especially the leading characters. Some of the secondary parts, with only a few lines, did come off as amateurish, but mostly quite professional.
It's not great or outstanding, and I will probably never watch it again, but I felt it was well worth my time on a lazy afternoon.
Overall: Above average zombie movie, recommended.
I finally caught Silent Zone, and while it's not the kind of film that's going to redefine the post-apocalyptic horror genre, it does enough right to keep you watching. It's one of those movies that doesn't try to be flashy or groundbreaking but instead leans into the tension and grit of survival-and for the most part, it works.
The setup is pretty straightforward. Years after a brutal outbreak has wiped out most of civilization, survivors Cassius and Abigail have learned how to stay alive by keeping their heads down and trusting no one. Their fragile routine gets thrown off when they encounter a pregnant woman. It's a moral dilemma that forces them to risk their own safety to find her a place of refuge. From that point, it becomes a tense road movie, where the threats come not just from the infected but from other desperate survivors.
What the film does well is build tension. You're never quite sure when something terrible is going to happen, and it creates this constant sense of unease. The infected are genuinely creepy, and the encounters with other survivors-who are often just as dangerous-add a layer of unpredictability. There's always this looming sense that things could go bad at any second, and that definitely kept me invested.
The performances also deserve some credit. The actors bring enough emotional depth to make you care about their struggle. You can feel the fear and the weariness in them, especially during the tougher moral moments when they're deciding whether to trust strangers or keep moving. That said, while the cast is solid, the characters themselves feel a little thin at times. There are moments when I wanted to know more about their pasts or what drives them beyond just survival. The film hints at deeper emotions but doesn't quite dig deep enough to make the characters feel fully fleshed out.
Visually, the movie is decent but nothing to write home about. The wasteland setting is bleak and unforgiving, which suits the story, but there's a kind of generic feel to it. It's the kind of landscape you've seen in plenty of other post-apocalyptic films, and I found myself wishing for just a bit more visual personality. The action sequences are engaging and well-paced, but there were moments when I felt like they leaned too much on standard tropes-running, hiding, close calls. It's effective but also a little predictable.
That kind of sums up the whole film. Silent Zone doesn't do much wrong, but it doesn't really stand out either. It plays it safe, which isn't necessarily bad, but it means the movie is more of a solid watch than an unforgettable experience. I never felt bored, but I also never felt blown away. It's competent, tense, and has some emotional beats that land well, but I couldn't shake the feeling that it could have pushed a little harder, dug a little deeper.
Still, if you're in the mood for a straightforward survival thriller with enough tension to keep you on edge, it's worth a watch. It doesn't try to be more than what it is, and in a way, I respect that. Just go in with tempered expectations, and you'll probably come away satisfied, if not overly impressed.
The setup is pretty straightforward. Years after a brutal outbreak has wiped out most of civilization, survivors Cassius and Abigail have learned how to stay alive by keeping their heads down and trusting no one. Their fragile routine gets thrown off when they encounter a pregnant woman. It's a moral dilemma that forces them to risk their own safety to find her a place of refuge. From that point, it becomes a tense road movie, where the threats come not just from the infected but from other desperate survivors.
What the film does well is build tension. You're never quite sure when something terrible is going to happen, and it creates this constant sense of unease. The infected are genuinely creepy, and the encounters with other survivors-who are often just as dangerous-add a layer of unpredictability. There's always this looming sense that things could go bad at any second, and that definitely kept me invested.
The performances also deserve some credit. The actors bring enough emotional depth to make you care about their struggle. You can feel the fear and the weariness in them, especially during the tougher moral moments when they're deciding whether to trust strangers or keep moving. That said, while the cast is solid, the characters themselves feel a little thin at times. There are moments when I wanted to know more about their pasts or what drives them beyond just survival. The film hints at deeper emotions but doesn't quite dig deep enough to make the characters feel fully fleshed out.
Visually, the movie is decent but nothing to write home about. The wasteland setting is bleak and unforgiving, which suits the story, but there's a kind of generic feel to it. It's the kind of landscape you've seen in plenty of other post-apocalyptic films, and I found myself wishing for just a bit more visual personality. The action sequences are engaging and well-paced, but there were moments when I felt like they leaned too much on standard tropes-running, hiding, close calls. It's effective but also a little predictable.
That kind of sums up the whole film. Silent Zone doesn't do much wrong, but it doesn't really stand out either. It plays it safe, which isn't necessarily bad, but it means the movie is more of a solid watch than an unforgettable experience. I never felt bored, but I also never felt blown away. It's competent, tense, and has some emotional beats that land well, but I couldn't shake the feeling that it could have pushed a little harder, dug a little deeper.
Still, if you're in the mood for a straightforward survival thriller with enough tension to keep you on edge, it's worth a watch. It doesn't try to be more than what it is, and in a way, I respect that. Just go in with tempered expectations, and you'll probably come away satisfied, if not overly impressed.
By all rights this should be a dumpster fire.
Zombies, lowish budget, but the actors and direction and crew do some serious heavy lifting throughout to add some absolute charm throughout.
The main leads Devere and Papp are great together, with a believable chemistry. Devere needs a break in some full on action spin alongside Frank Grillo etc. Papp feels a little out of water in an actioner - but give her a bit more time to aclimatise and I think you could have an easy action star, with an easy genuine screen presence (could be simply down to budget thing to allow time to get familiar with guns, but she's not as unconvincing as many high profile stars have been and we've been spoilt with Matrix, John Wick, etc more recently).
2nd line or Barabas, Hannigan, and Latham do great jobs. Hannigan in particular stands out acting wise. Latham has a great ol' time hamming it up in his role where he knows his story is cliche rubbish and runs with it, you can see he's just enjoying himself.
You're not going to be blown away, but like so many bad films that get a lot more press that genuinely waste your time this one won't.
Definitely hits above where it should have.
Zombies, lowish budget, but the actors and direction and crew do some serious heavy lifting throughout to add some absolute charm throughout.
The main leads Devere and Papp are great together, with a believable chemistry. Devere needs a break in some full on action spin alongside Frank Grillo etc. Papp feels a little out of water in an actioner - but give her a bit more time to aclimatise and I think you could have an easy action star, with an easy genuine screen presence (could be simply down to budget thing to allow time to get familiar with guns, but she's not as unconvincing as many high profile stars have been and we've been spoilt with Matrix, John Wick, etc more recently).
2nd line or Barabas, Hannigan, and Latham do great jobs. Hannigan in particular stands out acting wise. Latham has a great ol' time hamming it up in his role where he knows his story is cliche rubbish and runs with it, you can see he's just enjoying himself.
You're not going to be blown away, but like so many bad films that get a lot more press that genuinely waste your time this one won't.
Definitely hits above where it should have.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe map they use at the 32:03 mark shows Kisatchie National Forest, which places them near the town of Natchitoches, Lousiana, USA.
- Erros de gravaçãoAt 36 minutes person trying to communicate on a two way radio that had no battery or aerial connected.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Silent Zone?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração1 hora 59 minutos
- Cor
- Proporção
- 2.35 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente