Dr. Bernard Nathanson e Dr. Mildred Jefferson se enfrentam em uma batalha nacional nesta conspiração incalculável que levou ao caso mais famoso e controverso da história do tribunal.Dr. Bernard Nathanson e Dr. Mildred Jefferson se enfrentam em uma batalha nacional nesta conspiração incalculável que levou ao caso mais famoso e controverso da história do tribunal.Dr. Bernard Nathanson e Dr. Mildred Jefferson se enfrentam em uma batalha nacional nesta conspiração incalculável que levou ao caso mais famoso e controverso da história do tribunal.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 17 vitórias e 1 indicação no total
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
- the appallingly amateurish directing
- the high school level writing
- the Youtube parody acting
or the number of alt-right reviewers falling over themselves in the reviews trying to make this pass for a masterpiece.
Look, pro-choice or pro-life, everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but when you try to pretend that a movie" which makes SNL parodies look like Scorcese movies, with nutjob conspiracy that makes Charlie Sheen sound sane and reasonable, is the best thing ever, you just embarrass yourself.
I have seen more convincing pro-life arguments from FOX News, and that's saying a lot.
It's not just a bad movie, it's a bad movie filled with outright lies, misrepresentations and thinly-veiled political soap box speeches.
Unless you give them credit for having the names of the people involved correct, there's basically no truth to any of this, and if you're going to completely abandon reality, just make your own movie. Don't represent your utterly fiction as a docu-drama.
Also, these people actually WANTED to be associated with the likes of convicted felon Roger Stone and professional bully Milo Yianopolis. If that doesn't tell you all you need to know to pass on this, you should be ashamed of yourself.
The entire narrative is built on not just outright lies but also by an array of has-been talent who clearly needed money. You don't need to even be well-versed in the decision to know when the movie's spewing nonsense.
In a similar manner to last year's Never Rarely Sometimes Always (except that film is extraordinary, Roe v. Wade is extraordinarily bad), it's inspired me to give back... to Planned Parenthood.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesNumerous cast and crew were said to have quit the film after finding out about its strong anti-abortion message.
- Erros de gravaçãoThe film's epilogue states Planned Parenthood made $1.6 billion from abortions in 2018. According to their 501(c)(3) status report, of their $1.64 billion in income, $1.57 billion went to operating expenses. Additionally, abortion only represented 3% of their income, with the remaining 97% coming from STI treatments, contraception and cancer screenings.
- Citações
Dr. Bernard Nathanson: I didn't know what to say. I felt I was caught in a lie. So you have to understand, it was the 70's. The women's liberation movement was exploding. Millions of women were taking to the streets and I got swept up in the wake.
- ConexõesFeatured in The Cinema Snob: Roe v. Wade (2021)
Principais escolhas
- How long is Roe v. Wade?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Roe v. Wade
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 23.561
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 52 min(112 min)
- Cor
- Proporção
- 2.39 : 1