Triassic World

Don't let the other reviews mislead you;, this is actually not bad at all for an Asylum release - Me personally? for a low budgeter , I found the special effects rather well done and the gore will satisfy any horror fan!

A lot of the reviewers seem to rate sub 1 million pound movies with mutli million dollar ones like Jurassic Park and that is very unfair on the movie makers who make these low budget efforts - So give this one a try , it not bad at all but problem is , its just not that scary!

Not bad at all and will certainly pass a Friday night in with the partner , bottle of wine and some choccies!

It's predictable. Secret facility? Check. "For the greater good"? Check. But greed the biggest motive? Check. Nothing can go wrong? Check. Something goes wrong? Check. Lots of screaming, running, people getting eaten? Check.... Yet this movie is fun enough, because the acting isn't as bad as some of the B-movies I've seen. I actually rooted for a few of them to make it (which doesn't always happen) No, it's not exactly Oscar-material, but for a sad, rainy afternoon with a cup of hot coffee on the couch, it's good enough.

The movie moves very slowly and is very drawn out. When you think it's gonna be over there is another hour left. There is one setting in the entire movie making it even more lackluster. There are moments clearly ripping off scenes from the Jurassic Park franchise. And finally and most importantly, the plot does not make sense and is hard to follow. I still only know one of character's names after watching this. There are many plot holes and contradictory statements made, as well as things that aren't explained. However, if you can sit through without being bored the movie is kinda entertaining and if you like bad movies like I do you'll enjoy yourself.

This is such an obvious rip off of other movies, from the title to the enclosed environment similar to Deep Blue Sea. It lacks all the humour of the Sharknado type films and is ridiculously predictable with two dimensional characters being killed off in turn. The gore level is good, but it seems big savings were made in the dinosaur special effects, with them looking more like 1950s stop go animation than modern graphics.

Overall, probably worth a watch if there's nothing better on TV, but not worth going out of your way to see it.

Right, well with a movie named "Triassic World" and with a movie company like The Asylum standing behind its creation, we all know what we are in for here. Yes, another mockbuster, and this time let's guess it must be on the "Jurassic World 2" movie, just a hunch eh.

I would definitely be one of the first to raise an eyebrow and be suspicious of a movie such as this. But then again, every now and again does The Asylum actually put out a fairly entertaining movie, regardless of the cash-in on whatever movie they were toying with.

"Triassic World" actually turned out to be better than anticipated. Was it a predictable movie? You betcha. But there was just something fundamentally cheesy to the movie which actually made it worth watching.

And The Asylum really upped their game here in terms of special effects. I will say that, for the most part, then the dinosaurs actually looked quite decent. There were the occasional moment where it was blatantly just downright horrible CGI, but most of the time it was convincing enough. And that impressed CGI part actually brought a lot of value to the movie.

The acting in "Triassic World", however, was rather wooden and rigid, and was every bit as to be expected from a movie such as this. People were just not overly convincing throughout the movie.

"Triassic World" is the type of movie that you watch once and never again. Provided the fact that you actually can endure these type of shameless cash-in on upcoming or potential blockbuster movies from other huge movie companies.