AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,0/10
2,8 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Segue o hacker Connor, seu melhor amigo Avi e um astuto bibliotecário que se veem com problemas ao serem forçados a competir em um sofisticado jogo de recrutamento global de uma sociedade se... Ler tudoSegue o hacker Connor, seu melhor amigo Avi e um astuto bibliotecário que se veem com problemas ao serem forçados a competir em um sofisticado jogo de recrutamento global de uma sociedade secreta da dark web.Segue o hacker Connor, seu melhor amigo Avi e um astuto bibliotecário que se veem com problemas ao serem forçados a competir em um sofisticado jogo de recrutamento global de uma sociedade secreta da dark web.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
Not sure why actor Alan Ritchson turned producer, writer and director - also cast in his own film, decided to make this film into a parody-type childish humor production. It was riddled with plot and technical issues, long dragged out and unnecessary scenes, and lots of ridiculous eye candy that was too much filler for the little substance this film had.
Even though the pacing was decent, the 104 min runtime felt much longer and the too much useless blah blah dialogue made it even that much more annoying. This film needed shorter to-the-point scenes and at least 20 mins cut out of the runtime. The story-telling theme started off OK, but then became infantile once the actors started acting like children. Had Ritchson added an actual treasure map and cast Nicholas Cage, I may have enjoyed it more.
The humor was very lame, cheesy and forced, and only provided a few giggles, thanks in part to Ron Funches' funny demeanor. The casting and acting was actually decent, as were the visuals and set pieces. The score was on point as was the cinematography. I just wish the story took a more serious approach instead of the tween target audience theme, it could've been a hit. Nevertheless, it was a decent production from a newb filmmaker.
Even though the pacing was decent, the 104 min runtime felt much longer and the too much useless blah blah dialogue made it even that much more annoying. This film needed shorter to-the-point scenes and at least 20 mins cut out of the runtime. The story-telling theme started off OK, but then became infantile once the actors started acting like children. Had Ritchson added an actual treasure map and cast Nicholas Cage, I may have enjoyed it more.
The humor was very lame, cheesy and forced, and only provided a few giggles, thanks in part to Ron Funches' funny demeanor. The casting and acting was actually decent, as were the visuals and set pieces. The score was on point as was the cinematography. I just wish the story took a more serious approach instead of the tween target audience theme, it could've been a hit. Nevertheless, it was a decent production from a newb filmmaker.
The acting was enjoyable. I surprisingly liked it even if this type of comedy is not my cup of tea.
It has a lot of the F word but the movie was strangely entertaining the comedy might not be for everyone
it started out with hacking but then turned into follow the clues so the story kind of got off track but none the less it was watchable and funny.
7/10
it started out with hacking but then turned into follow the clues so the story kind of got off track but none the less it was watchable and funny.
7/10
This has got to be the dumbest movie, but the jokes are hilarious! Definitely a nerd show making fun of secret societies and government institutions like the FBI and NSA.
Entertaining for the first 45 minutes. The second half of the movie, not so much. It became a little strange and looked low budget, like they ran out of funding half way through filming. Nevertheless, the film wasn't bad. Not something I'd watch again but I wouldn't say it was a waste of time. 5 stars
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesCicada 3301 is a nickname given to an organization that on three occasions has posted a set of puzzles to recruit codebreakers from the public. The first internet puzzle started on January 4, 2012 on 4chan and ran for approximately one month. A second round began one year later on January 4, 2013, and then a third round following the confirmation of a fresh clue posted on Twitter on January 4, 2014. The stated intent was to recruit "intelligent individuals" by presenting a series of puzzles which were to be solved. No new puzzles were published on January 4, 2015. However, a new clue was posted on Twitter on January 5, 2016. In April 2017 a verified PGP-signed message was found: Beware false paths. Always verify PGP signature from 7A35090F. That message explicitly denies the validity of any unsigned puzzle, as recently as April 2017. The puzzles focused heavily on data security, cryptography, steganography, internet anonymity, and surveillance. It has been called "the most elaborate and mysterious puzzle of the internet age"and is listed as one of the "top 5 eeriest, unsolved mysteries of the internet," and much speculation exists as to its function. Many have speculated that the puzzles are a recruitment tool for the NSA, CIA, MI6, a "Masonic conspiracy" or a cyber mercenary group. Others have claimed Cicada 3301 is an alternate reality game. No company or individual has taken credit for it or attempted to monetize it, however.
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosDuring the credits there is a follow up scene featuring the security guard and Agent Carver in the Rare books archive.
- ConexõesFeatured in Weekend Express: Episode dated 9 May 2021 (2021)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Dark Web: Cicada 3301?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- شبكة الويب المظلمة: سيكادا 3301
- Locações de filme
- Toronto, Ontário, Canadá(location)
- Empresa de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 10.637
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 44 min(104 min)
- Proporção
- 2.00 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente