Navio de Sangue

I had really high hopes for this film after reading many comments. This film both worked and failed for me. It worked as a thriller more than a horror film, the acting was good on most parts, not all. The story was good to. The bad, why Tue bickering between characters, this to me fell right from the start and got on my nerves. There was no surprise at the end, so this was a bit of a let down foe me. The main problem I had was the film was slow in some parts and I found myself getting bored waiting for something to happen. Nearly an above average film but not this time.

"It ain't about luck mate. It ain't. It's how you play the hand you're dealt."

My feelings towards this Aussie horror film are pretty much the same as a year ago when I caught it at a film festival. Generic, if slickly-competent potboiler. It feels like it was taking cues from 'Death Ship' and '30 Days of Nights'. Then trying to add its own spin to the familiar formula, but not completely landing it. By the end the pacing, script and performances probably lets it down.

Set during the end of the Second World War. A small group of survivors of a torpedoed hospital ship adrift at sea in a life raft board a passing Nazi vessel. The Germans were going to be the least of their worries, especially when they find out it homes much more of a threat than they could ever imagined. Something which rid the vessel of its original crew. It's a typical group of cliched caricatures in presenting their personalities and nationalities. The performances of the cast fall into the same pattern as the script. Not awful, just bland and mechanical in delivery.

A lot of the first half is spent on lazy scripted feuding between the characters and wandering dimly lit corridors of a ghost ship figuring out the mystery to what happened to the original crew. Too long is spent on those actions in-spite of the miraculously crafted and photographed set-designs. Very gothic in its vibes. Because when we find out about the real threat, it seems to rush through it without really establishing it properly. So it doesn't feel all that effective when it gets to the bloody carnage. It's one thing to start late, but disappointing when you think there's too little of it for your liking. The FX for the ancient Romanian vampires looked decent enough, but how they presented them in character seemed more laughable then imposing. Too exuberant. You know you're in trouble when the kid feels far more threatening then the adults. I would have been more interested in seeing what happened to the original German crew, then following this ragtag group. Especially with the interesting lore of the Nazi's curiosity in the occult/supernatural.

A very unlikely group of allied forces survivors run into a seemingly deserted Nazi ship in the middle of Atlantic Ocean, only to find... stirgoi. The poster and the name tells you what this is so I don't it is a spoiler when I say vampires.

Despite plot holes the size of Donald Trump's ego and budget the size of his.... brain, this movie is campy fun, if you set your expectations low.

High production values given the budget, a decent ensemble makes this surprisingly enjoyable, even if the ending is predictable. So, stop complaining and just enjoy watching for Alex Cooke's Teplov steal the show from his higher billed co-stars. A star will be born soon, I think.

The offerings of the considerably small niche of horror movies set during a war or another are always welcome in my world, despite most of them being lacklusters - "Blood Vessel", for the most part, is exactly that. Coming from Justin Dix, a special effects aficionado turned writer and director, "Blood Vessel" offers entertainment in the form of 80's best aesthetical traditions, and very little besides that. For extra bonus points, one must take this shlock horror not seriously.

It is 1945 and the middle of the ocean. A real ragtag team - including a tough but righteous Russian sniper, a moronic Englishman, an American cook, an Australian soldier, a useless captain, an all-motherly Alyssa Sutherland, and more - are hopelessly drifting on a raft to a certain death, but a chance at survival presents itself in a form of an eerie, silently drifting German minesweeper. As we tag along our indubitably stereotypical team of heroes on the mysterious Nazi ship, the excursion takes us through ~40 minutes of slow building of a shallow story that has frequent issues, before it kicks the gear into ~40 minutes of a tad bit more entertaining horror feast - none of which is scary. Frankly, "Blood Vessel" is almost entirely void of tension, and the turns of the plot are more likely to elicit a dry response rather than a surprising one.

One thing that "Blood Vessel" has going for it, is the fact that its maker knows and loves practical special effects. Though a low budget feature and playing out as such, among a little confusing action scenes there are mildly satisfying 80's kind of gore and make-up galore. Set designs are also quite fine, but cinematography's uneven and the original score - a highly typical one, not counting the chanting Nazi occult jingles. However, perhaps the most awesome part of "Blood Vessel" is comedy value. Some of it is intentional, some is not, but either way Teplov (Alex Cooke), Sinclair (Nathan Philipps), and even the villain will make up for some amusement, especially if You're not watching it alone.

The lovers of modern shlocks reminiscent of the 80's, and fans of horror movies set in wartimes, such as myself, can try and find some fun in "Blood Vessel", preferably with a friend and a beer. My rating: 4/10.

This movie isn't awful, but it's not good. Its a B-Movie and it doesn't set itself to be a masterpiece, which I can respect.

I think that the acting was a bit awkward at times, but passable and some scenes were even good. Also, the plot isn't original, but it isn't also as cliche as many other horror films. I think the setting was interesting and it had potential. Nevertheless, I must say the film fails to reach a good level simply because in many ways the director played it safe and followed cliches and tropes from other films. The ending is worst part of all, it falls under the category of "super cliches" and it is also the result of a quite big plot-hole. I think they wasted the potential to have an entraining film, the protagonists are luckluster and most of them die in stupid or anticlimactic ways. Therefore, I can't bring myself to rate this more than 5.