A história de quatro soldados americanos, que, depois de testemunharem o assassinato cruel de um civil inocente às mãos do seu sargento, são enviados para uma missão suicida liderada por um ... Ler tudoA história de quatro soldados americanos, que, depois de testemunharem o assassinato cruel de um civil inocente às mãos do seu sargento, são enviados para uma missão suicida liderada por um guerrilheiro local.A história de quatro soldados americanos, que, depois de testemunharem o assassinato cruel de um civil inocente às mãos do seu sargento, são enviados para uma missão suicida liderada por um guerrilheiro local.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
Chris Crema
- Walberg
- (as Christopher Crema)
Nathan Jean
- Sniper
- (as Nathan David Jean)
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
What this movie suffers from is a lack of originality and lack of creativity. It very much took from the horror movie style of dragging out a scene and making the viewer think a jump scare is coming only to reward it like once in the entire film with a meaningful moment. The majority of the film creates a bunch of build up and somewhat artificial tension to try and make the audience feel the hopelessness and turmoil of the soldiers. But frankly, they just didn't go through enough in the film to justify their stress and internal mutiny.
The film was clearly trying to showcase the impact of war on these boys but didn't think how to make the audience really care about the characters going through it in the film. Hard to blame the actors because they had to keep raising the stakes with the somewhat mediocre material they were working with and everything just felt very forced. A lot of the typical ingredients of fear, hopelessness and internal fighting amongst the soldiers were present but again, forced. The main lead keeps getting flashbacks and reliving the trauma of seeing dead civilians amidst assignment. The whole thing is incredibly forced and overacted to a point that just takes you out of it. I'm sure it's just what he was directed to do but the whole thing is too much and really sums up the film unflatteringly. Seriously, the main character spends half the movie with his face in a scrunched, enraged and/or tearful manic episode and it just doesn't really work well for the guy who's gonna be taking up the most screen time. It's war, it's horrible and traumatizing, and we need those "moments" but we don't need to see the main character wearing it on his sleeve the entire movie. Imagine Tom Hanks singular crying moment in Saving Private Ryan but for pretty much half or more of the entire movie. Not gonna have the same impact is it? Somebody should've told this director.
If you're into the genre I think this is worth a watch because there are a couple of sequences where the suspense is drawn out engagingly and it's a great example of a pretty low budget, simple concept style film.
I wouldn't call this a terrible movie, it's just definitely not a good one and only worth your time when you're looking for something you haven't seen in the war film genre. If you enjoyed the more subdued pace of the classic Band Of Brothers, there might be a couple of gem moments in this film for you. But they're few, far between, and add up to nothing much.
The film was clearly trying to showcase the impact of war on these boys but didn't think how to make the audience really care about the characters going through it in the film. Hard to blame the actors because they had to keep raising the stakes with the somewhat mediocre material they were working with and everything just felt very forced. A lot of the typical ingredients of fear, hopelessness and internal fighting amongst the soldiers were present but again, forced. The main lead keeps getting flashbacks and reliving the trauma of seeing dead civilians amidst assignment. The whole thing is incredibly forced and overacted to a point that just takes you out of it. I'm sure it's just what he was directed to do but the whole thing is too much and really sums up the film unflatteringly. Seriously, the main character spends half the movie with his face in a scrunched, enraged and/or tearful manic episode and it just doesn't really work well for the guy who's gonna be taking up the most screen time. It's war, it's horrible and traumatizing, and we need those "moments" but we don't need to see the main character wearing it on his sleeve the entire movie. Imagine Tom Hanks singular crying moment in Saving Private Ryan but for pretty much half or more of the entire movie. Not gonna have the same impact is it? Somebody should've told this director.
If you're into the genre I think this is worth a watch because there are a couple of sequences where the suspense is drawn out engagingly and it's a great example of a pretty low budget, simple concept style film.
I wouldn't call this a terrible movie, it's just definitely not a good one and only worth your time when you're looking for something you haven't seen in the war film genre. If you enjoyed the more subdued pace of the classic Band Of Brothers, there might be a couple of gem moments in this film for you. But they're few, far between, and add up to nothing much.
Supposedly based somewhat on true events, Recon is a basic, low budget take about 4 soldiers who having just completed a mentally scarring mission are promptly sent back out to perform recon and report on enemy movements among the snow - capped Italian mountains during World War 2. The overarching theme is of soldiers already struggling with the consequences and psychological toll of previous actions, being thrust into another compromising situation. The movie is Robert Port's (an Oscar winning short filmmaker) feature debut and he is clearly less invested in military minutiae and more interested in seeing where these characters go from the film's harrowing opening scene, which unfortunately is also better than anything that follows.
Port in my opinion, needed to spend a little more of the film's production budget on getting more accurate technical military advice. Because although the acting is of an acceptable standard, the reconnaissance soldiers we see depicted, just behave so incongruously, it's just too much of an ask, that we viewers are expected to believe in and sympathise with them.
I've only had limited military training and experience, but seriously. Soldiers behind enemy lines wandering haphazardly, shouting and arguing constantly amongst themselves, grouping together to make easy targets, not searching people they come across properly, especially considering the aforementioned opening scenes? Absolutely nothing rings true. I mean I literally wanted to reach through the screen and throttle Private Asch myself. He just never shut up and was seemingly oblivious to the fact that a noisy, careless soldier such as himself would likely attract enemy attention to either himself, or his fellow soldiers. Simply confounding all around!
Recon looks good, for a small scale production. It's just a pity that after a compelling opening stanza, bizarre narrative set - ups and script decisions make the finished film so ineffective in conveying its worthy themes concerning post traumatic stress disorders among front line military personnel.
Port in my opinion, needed to spend a little more of the film's production budget on getting more accurate technical military advice. Because although the acting is of an acceptable standard, the reconnaissance soldiers we see depicted, just behave so incongruously, it's just too much of an ask, that we viewers are expected to believe in and sympathise with them.
I've only had limited military training and experience, but seriously. Soldiers behind enemy lines wandering haphazardly, shouting and arguing constantly amongst themselves, grouping together to make easy targets, not searching people they come across properly, especially considering the aforementioned opening scenes? Absolutely nothing rings true. I mean I literally wanted to reach through the screen and throttle Private Asch myself. He just never shut up and was seemingly oblivious to the fact that a noisy, careless soldier such as himself would likely attract enemy attention to either himself, or his fellow soldiers. Simply confounding all around!
Recon looks good, for a small scale production. It's just a pity that after a compelling opening stanza, bizarre narrative set - ups and script decisions make the finished film so ineffective in conveying its worthy themes concerning post traumatic stress disorders among front line military personnel.
This is most definitely not a soldier's movie. It's a movie written by someone who creates an unbelievable world of war and soldiers and is directed and produced by people with too few funds and not a whole lot of understanding about film making.
It's a movie where a reconnaissance patrol always walks down the middle of roads or fields all the while talking loudly or shouting. Oh, and with lit cigarettes. Stealth was not their long suit.
It's a movie where young men in 1943 constantly swear and use phrases from 2019. Where a commanding officer orders that an unarmed civilian be shot and orders it in front of about 20 witnesses.
It's all simply unbelievable. And it's poorly made and made on the cheap.
I won't waste any more or your time. Just a friendly warning, don't view this thing no matter how desperate you are for something to do. It's that bad.
It's a movie where a reconnaissance patrol always walks down the middle of roads or fields all the while talking loudly or shouting. Oh, and with lit cigarettes. Stealth was not their long suit.
It's a movie where young men in 1943 constantly swear and use phrases from 2019. Where a commanding officer orders that an unarmed civilian be shot and orders it in front of about 20 witnesses.
It's all simply unbelievable. And it's poorly made and made on the cheap.
I won't waste any more or your time. Just a friendly warning, don't view this thing no matter how desperate you are for something to do. It's that bad.
This was simply a long and boring story about pretty much nothing, with terrible directing and ridiculous faded dizzying flashbacks. The 95 minute runtime felt like 3 hours. There were so many plot and technical issues, a Cub Scout would have better evasive measures knowledge when someone is shooting at you. This film needed to be a short - no more than 30-40 mins, to make any impact. What little impact it had, was absorbed by the boredom and highly predictable story-line. The score was too much for this film, but thankfully not as overbearing and out of place than most B-grade films. Acting was decent, especially from Viking's Alexander Ludwig. The cinematography and colors were very impressive, and the only redeeming qualities of this film. It's a generous 4/10 from me.
It's not a blow your socks off action war epic. It's a small, dialogue driven suspense story. Most of the performances are very well done. There are a few questionable editing choices and some drawn out sequences. But in my opinion it's not as bad as most of these reviewers are saying it is.
Você sabia?
- Erros de gravaçãoAt approx 76 minutes there is a Willys MC clearly visible and in another subsequent scene. The MC was an upgrade to the MB/GPW but was not introduced till 1949.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Recon?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Centrais de atendimento oficiais
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Recon
- Locações de filme
- Empresa de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 10.086
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 35 min(95 min)
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente