The Spy Who Fell to Earth
- 2019
- 1 h 34 min
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,6/10
1,2 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Um historiador ambicioso desmascara o melhor espião do mundo e põe em evidência os eventos que levam à morte misteriosa do espião.Um historiador ambicioso desmascara o melhor espião do mundo e põe em evidência os eventos que levam à morte misteriosa do espião.Um historiador ambicioso desmascara o melhor espião do mundo e põe em evidência os eventos que levam à morte misteriosa do espião.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
Muammar Gaddafi
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
- (as Muammar Gadaffi)
Henry Kissinger
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
Nikita Khrushchev
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
Leonid Brezhnev
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
Moshe Dayan
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
Gamal Abdel Nasser
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
Anwar Sadat
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
Hafez al-Assad
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
Ashraf Marwan
- Self
- (cenas de arquivo)
Avaliações em destaque
The basic story is really fascinating, yet, this film is totally unconvincing. I was completely unimpressed with the rationale of Aaron Bergman.
A documentary that to some may feel unfulfilled. We have a spy who was quite the figure. Many things remain unknown about his motives, about his believes, about whom he worked for. Or for how many people. What seems pretty clear is that he didn't just jump and try to fly. I think everyone can agree that that would be quite convinient and totally wrong.
But who did it then? One of the many things the documentary tries to reveal. Again there will be a lot of people who are not satisfied with this and what it actually says. I understand people who argue that it goes in circles or repeats certain talking points. It still is done very well over all. Could have been shorter for sure, but don't hold it against it
But who did it then? One of the many things the documentary tries to reveal. Again there will be a lot of people who are not satisfied with this and what it actually says. I understand people who argue that it goes in circles or repeats certain talking points. It still is done very well over all. Could have been shorter for sure, but don't hold it against it
The historian behind this story is either not very clever or a grandiose crook or both. My guess is, I'm sorry to say, he might be both.
It's clear that the author thinks he's all that, and he is by far the weakest part of the documentary. Also the info they chose to leave out in lieu of simply retelling the story over and over again, is strange. The editing was also strange and unnecessarily confusing.
Total waste of time under a gripping name. The film is pointless consisting of repetitive scenes and having no distinctive narrative. It gives nothing. Why it is done? Looks a lot like the author's egotrip presenting mostly him.
Você sabia?
- Curiosidades"The Angel" Netflix film on the same subject
- Citações
Himself - Interviewer: When recruiting a new agent, what are the risks to you, to the Mossad?
David Arbel: To the Mossad, first that he might be a double agent. Number two, he's a liar. And number three is that he can surrender you which is very dangerous.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
- Tempo de duração1 hora 34 minutos
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was The Spy Who Fell to Earth (2019) officially released in Canada in English?
Responda