Avaliações de usuários

I give movies 20 minutes to see if they're drawing me in or not with an absorbing story, and 20 minutes was all i could stand of this, the thumb/cover image was far more entertaining. The "efforts", masquerading as "movies" these days is laughable.

Amateurish, dull, uninteresting, void of any realness, like a school play put to screen, how on earth did this get over a 7 in ratings? Who is rating these ridiculous attempts at "movies".

There are few movies these days that will hold your attention throughout, this isn't one of them, no way. If you go beyond 20 minutes theres nothing upstairs.

Light weight entertainment with a couple of little kinky bits thrown in. I see weird people!!

This is some of the worst acting i have seen in years. None of the actors fits their parts and they all speak like they are reading their lines from a script in a theatre rehearsal... waste of bloody time.

This movie was the biggest waste of my time. It is also made by someone who is mentally ill and totally not worth watching.

Every part of movie was predictable and cast was worst. No storyline and no direction just a couple of people trying to live. Feeling like wasted my time. Thank you.

Where do i begin with this one? Lighting, acting, storyline, script, what else?? Ten minutes into it and I feel like I'm watching a home movie. Not exactly the WORST I've seen, but runner up for sure. The acting is....yikes. The protagonist tries (I think anyways) but it's not cutting it. The storyline and pace of the movie is very slow. I don't know how I sat through the time that I did, really. It was like watching a YouTube short and I'm questioning why I attempted to watch this. Just bad quality and I'm really glad didnt pay for it. I think at some point I just looked up and said to my husband, "should I just exit out of this?" Yea, that's what everyone probably thought.

The British film Assistant had a few interesting ideas attached onto it, but you can definitely tell that this was a first time feature film. I thought that the story itself had a lot of holes and the writing wasn't very good either. Really on the nose and with most of the script.

Performances were hindered really badly also by the lack of a well structured script as well. And a good chunk of off the movie just felt bland and shallow. A decent try at a scandalous steamy thriller, but left a TON to be desired. Not very good is Louisa Warren has much to do with these type of films. Avoid them like the plague.

Brit attempt to ride the 50 Shades express that is equally reminiscent of 1990s erotic thrillers and the 1970s swinging suburb fixations of Derek Ford, some Jackie Collins worthy dialogue too "his personality is as vibrant as a hippopotamus' arse*ole"

Considering that the director's subsequent horror films have been rather coy when it comes to nudity and sexuality, Dirty Work is a surprisingly explicit movie, far more so in fact than the 50 Shades series whose (BDSM) party this is trying to gate crash. Claudine-Helene Aumord, a Barbara Steele type, does most of the heavy lifting when it comes to the female nudity, but there's something for the ladies here too, namely a succession of well oiled abs and more buns than your local branch of Greggs.

I read some of the reviews before watching it and rolled the dice anyway.

I went in not expecting much and was actually pleasantly surprised.

While the acting was not great it wasn't bad, while I don't want to give anything away, I do want to share what appealed to me.

I found; I grew to like Arabella's character. I found to some degree art imitating life, as Arabella's choice at the end is so telling as to how a lot of people go right back to life making the same choices that are not the best for us. Putting ourselves on the very same track of trouble.

While obviously this film with its sexual content will turn some people off others will be quite turned on by its erotic allure.

Marylin's character was so manipulative. She brought a necessary dynamic to the table that played Arabella right into her hands.

Total waste of time, even if it's just over an hour long. I feel for the actors who aren't even the worst, it's just that the inept writing and directing that drag this garbage into the deepest depths of the unwatchable abyss. Avoid!

Norm MacDonald attempts a new kind of role, which didn't really work out. If you are a deeply closeted gay man, this movie is not for you.

The song is about 10:00 plz help me to find that song and singer plz

No pun intended - I had no idea what I was letting myself into. Which I reckon is also true for our main character here. Though I would like to believe that most people who watch this will know what is up. Her best friend on the other hand ... well if you are missing her at some point, do not try to overthink it.

The movie is quite sexual to say the least. And it has 50 shades of grey written all over itself. Although to be fair, it does not have that many shades to it. So I understand if you dislike the movie to say the least. It boils down to, what you expect from this I reckon. As an erotic thriller it works - even with the subpar acting that you get served. It is about the substance - and where it leads us to. We know where this is going, but there is still one final twist if you want to call it that, that was quite surprising I have to admit .. on the other hand it goes to show you human nature.