AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
5,3/10
2,4 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Nick e Janine vivem em casamento até o ex-marido de Janine perder tempo a tentar separá-los. À medida que as memórias de Nick desaparecem, ele tem de decidir o que está disposto a sacrificar... Ler tudoNick e Janine vivem em casamento até o ex-marido de Janine perder tempo a tentar separá-los. À medida que as memórias de Nick desaparecem, ele tem de decidir o que está disposto a sacrificar, ou largar, tudo o que ama.Nick e Janine vivem em casamento até o ex-marido de Janine perder tempo a tentar separá-los. À medida que as memórias de Nick desaparecem, ele tem de decidir o que está disposto a sacrificar, ou largar, tudo o que ama.
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Artistas
Charles R. Singh
- Elliot
- (as Charles Singh)
Nat D'Amico
- Ryder
- (as Natalie D'Amico)
Johannah Newmarch
- Hekima
- (narração)
- Direção
- Roteiristas
- Elenco e equipe completos
- Produção, bilheteria e muito mais no IMDbPro
Avaliações em destaque
"Needle in a Timestack" should be viewed as a drama set in a science fiction background. If you think it's a science fiction film, you'll be bored. If you view it as a drama, it would be interesting, because it's about all the could haves and should haves in life. It is about the regrets and sorrows of life, and what you would do to change it if you could go back time.
This tells the story of a couple who are very much in love but are split up permanently and forget each other in the present by an ex who goes back in time.
The film isn't really about time travel. It's never really explained how it works or how people have come to just accept their lives regularly being altered by people messing around in the past.
This is all love story and if people can still be in love if they don't remember each other.
It's a bit slow and pretentious in places. I almost gave up after 5 mins. When I got to the end it felt more like achievement than satisfaction at a good film.
It really felt like it could have been much better done. It's hard to really care about the characters so you feel cold against what is happening instead of being drawn in and involved. It should be a film you discuss about after but it's just lacking in something.
It's worth a watch but it just really feels like it should have been a far bigger and better film. A waste as it's well acted and it's believable but not well executed.
The film isn't really about time travel. It's never really explained how it works or how people have come to just accept their lives regularly being altered by people messing around in the past.
This is all love story and if people can still be in love if they don't remember each other.
It's a bit slow and pretentious in places. I almost gave up after 5 mins. When I got to the end it felt more like achievement than satisfaction at a good film.
It really felt like it could have been much better done. It's hard to really care about the characters so you feel cold against what is happening instead of being drawn in and involved. It should be a film you discuss about after but it's just lacking in something.
It's worth a watch but it just really feels like it should have been a far bigger and better film. A waste as it's well acted and it's believable but not well executed.
Time travel is happening. The rich are doing it. Whenever a time shift happens, everybody scrambles to check for personal changes before they lose their memory of the previous time line. Nick Mikkelsen (Leslie Odom Jr.) and Janine (Cynthia Erivo) are happily married. He is worried that her first husband Tommy Hambleton (Orlando Bloom) is trying to use time travel to eliminate their relationship. That's exactly what happens and he finds that he's married to his long-time girlfriend Alex Leslie (Freida Pinto).
This is an intriguing Twilight Zone premise. The film does need to use that premise in a compelling story. While I'm fascinating with the world-building, the movie fails to construct the story around it. It's like there's a great foundation but the building is not much more than a box. This is almost two hours but it's really only doing the first act. I wonder if the short story is worth a shorter flick. Maybe the story needs expanding.
This is an intriguing Twilight Zone premise. The film does need to use that premise in a compelling story. While I'm fascinating with the world-building, the movie fails to construct the story around it. It's like there's a great foundation but the building is not much more than a box. This is almost two hours but it's really only doing the first act. I wonder if the short story is worth a shorter flick. Maybe the story needs expanding.
The thing that impressed me the most is how realistic the future technology is. Very creepy in a Black Mirror way. It was a little slow, but NO WAY is it a 3.3 which is what the score is as I am writing this. I think that most people may see this as a love story, and this is how it seems at the beginning. But my interpretation of this movie is that technology is the antagonist here. No one can just live their life without someone interfering, and even though the message appears to be love will find a way in any circumstance, I see the real message is that technology that interferes by rewriting our past can cause a lot of pain and sorrow.
Look story was good but it should of explained more about time travel and how they were able to do it. This movie is a LOVE STORY NOTHING ELSE so if you are looking for Sci fi or time travel it's not that. It's about love and how true love can outstand anything no matter what it is even time travel. Worth a watch.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe short story by Robert Silverberg that this movie is based on was first published in the June 1983 issue of Playboy. Silverberg had previously published a collection of ten short stories under the same title in 1966, and decided to re-use the title for this story.
- Citações
Zoe Mikkelsen: What if you go back and change your past but you end up with no future?
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosIn keeping with one of the film's mantras, that "Love is formed in a circle", each of the main end credits has a letter "O" which persists while the other letters fade out.
- Trilhas sonorasIn the Beginning
Written by Jeremy Steig
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Needle in a Timestack?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idiomas
- Também conhecido como
- Needle in a Timestack
- Locações de filme
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração1 hora 51 minutos
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
What is the Canadian French language plot outline for Agulha no Palheiro Temporal (2021)?
Responda