AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
2,9/10
3,9 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
A agente especial Lucinda Kavsky trabalha para uma parte secreta da CIA. Ela recebeu uma tarefa muito especial.A agente especial Lucinda Kavsky trabalha para uma parte secreta da CIA. Ela recebeu uma tarefa muito especial.A agente especial Lucinda Kavsky trabalha para uma parte secreta da CIA. Ela recebeu uma tarefa muito especial.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 1 vitória no total
Avaliações em destaque
What on earth have I just watched!!
The background music is constant and annoying - as well as being inappropriate for whatever happens to be on screen.
The continuity is all over the place - I don't think anyone thought about joining the pieces of this film together - and the editing is constant cut scenes - sometimes with characters moving to completely different positions from shot to shot.
The story is just ridiculous - as is the script/dialogue.
Then we come to the 'acting'. Oh my word - it is AWFUL. Wooden doesn't come close to describing how bad it is. The main character hardly changes expression - maybe it's because of the plastic surgery - and it seems as though her 'dialogue' had been dubbed in post-production
The stunts/action is just as stupid as the rest of the film.
This is one you REALLY shouldn't waste your time or money on.
The background music is constant and annoying - as well as being inappropriate for whatever happens to be on screen.
The continuity is all over the place - I don't think anyone thought about joining the pieces of this film together - and the editing is constant cut scenes - sometimes with characters moving to completely different positions from shot to shot.
The story is just ridiculous - as is the script/dialogue.
Then we come to the 'acting'. Oh my word - it is AWFUL. Wooden doesn't come close to describing how bad it is. The main character hardly changes expression - maybe it's because of the plastic surgery - and it seems as though her 'dialogue' had been dubbed in post-production
The stunts/action is just as stupid as the rest of the film.
This is one you REALLY shouldn't waste your time or money on.
When I read the info on this movie it sounded very interesting. I like movies with a strong female lead who can kick butt and was looking forward to watching it. But nothing could have prepared me for this mess! Honestly, I only kept watching to find out what the big mystery was! The poor lead had two expressions: her eyes got bigger and her lips pursed when she was shocked or upset. That was it! I thought it could have been so much better with a better script, director and lead actress. When I learned that the writer and director was Gia I saw what went wrong. The editing was also poor, but there is only so much a person can do with such a bad movie.
The headline says it all. The only reason I'm continuing to type? It says my review is too short.
If I think a movie is really bad then like most I will write a scathing review. However this film is so bad I feel as if I would be criticizing people with mental disabilities or cognitive delay.
What I cannot understand is how someone in this day and age when every movie is out there for renting or viewing on Netflix etc. they cannot watch them to learn what to do and what not to do.
The dialogue seemed written by 8 to 10 year old kids that have watched every B movie out there and didn't even nail that. The pacing of the actors was terrible also. Lighting? Was there any thought given to that?
I understand budgets can influence the outcome of a movie but in this case no budget could have saved it. If I am writing this it is at least this film can serve as an example to future film makers on what NOT TO DO! Put quality in the script. Be realistic in the production based on what budget you have. Pick quality actors (and not yourself unless you are better than what you find). Lear lighting technique or hire someone that knows it well. It's an essential to film making. Then there is editing! Get an editor and colorist that knows what they are doing.
Yes these things cost money but this movie had more budget than most amateur films I've seen yet many of those surpassed this garbage because their story and intent was foremost.
It's extremely difficult to be the writer, actor, director and producer in any film for extremely talented and experienced film makers. As I said this film would be a waste of time other than it can fulfill a use by being a standard of the abysmal failure.
What I cannot understand is how someone in this day and age when every movie is out there for renting or viewing on Netflix etc. they cannot watch them to learn what to do and what not to do.
The dialogue seemed written by 8 to 10 year old kids that have watched every B movie out there and didn't even nail that. The pacing of the actors was terrible also. Lighting? Was there any thought given to that?
I understand budgets can influence the outcome of a movie but in this case no budget could have saved it. If I am writing this it is at least this film can serve as an example to future film makers on what NOT TO DO! Put quality in the script. Be realistic in the production based on what budget you have. Pick quality actors (and not yourself unless you are better than what you find). Lear lighting technique or hire someone that knows it well. It's an essential to film making. Then there is editing! Get an editor and colorist that knows what they are doing.
Yes these things cost money but this movie had more budget than most amateur films I've seen yet many of those surpassed this garbage because their story and intent was foremost.
It's extremely difficult to be the writer, actor, director and producer in any film for extremely talented and experienced film makers. As I said this film would be a waste of time other than it can fulfill a use by being a standard of the abysmal failure.
Very amateurish...
At least some beginner filmmakers start with some projects they can handle, and learn -- before attempting a longer ambitious project. This was a HUGE bite, very poorly executed, and the result is BAD.
There are more flaws in this thing than anything -- in writing, directing, editing, etc., etc.
I feel sorry for the actors -- for them, I gave this a 2 rating. In spite of the obviously poor direction, not all look as bad as the "star".
I see a lot of 10 "ratings" LOL!! They are obviously fake.
At least some beginner filmmakers start with some projects they can handle, and learn -- before attempting a longer ambitious project. This was a HUGE bite, very poorly executed, and the result is BAD.
There are more flaws in this thing than anything -- in writing, directing, editing, etc., etc.
I feel sorry for the actors -- for them, I gave this a 2 rating. In spite of the obviously poor direction, not all look as bad as the "star".
I see a lot of 10 "ratings" LOL!! They are obviously fake.
Você sabia?
- Erros de gravaçãoLucinda rescues the child in Manhattan, but palms and other warm-weather shrubbery they pass while being pursued don't grow there, and are clearly from their California locations.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is The Serpent?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- The Serpent
- Locações de filme
- EUA(The Serpent)
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 1.200.000
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 1.200
- 19 de jun. de 2021
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 29 min(89 min)
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente