Estabelecidos 200 anos no futuro, um pequeno grupo de rebeldes desafia o status quo em que os humanos alcançaram a imortalidade através da engenharia genética.Estabelecidos 200 anos no futuro, um pequeno grupo de rebeldes desafia o status quo em que os humanos alcançaram a imortalidade através da engenharia genética.Estabelecidos 200 anos no futuro, um pequeno grupo de rebeldes desafia o status quo em que os humanos alcançaram a imortalidade através da engenharia genética.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
- Ormas
- (não creditado)
- Sila
- (não creditado)
Avaliações em destaque
The movie also presents the main idea fairly early on and then spends the rest of the movie developing the plot and exploring some of the nuances of that main idea. Don't expect too many sharp twists and turns.
For a low-budget movie, I was actually quite impressed at how easily I was able to lose myself in the story (as opposed to thinking "This looks like the set was cobbled together with parts from the junkyard," which some movies seem to be). I liked how part of that accessibility was how natural all the actors & actresses were; instead of an unnaturally-Hollywood-gorgeous-pencil-thin cast they were all just clean, normal yet attractive people. I was also impressed that despite the low budget they were all fairly convincing actors.
Some other reviewers thought this was a Christian movie, but it is actually just a "faith vs science" thing, or even better "determinism vs free will."
All in all I definitely think this deserves a rating much higher than the 3/10 that it shows at the moment. I've seen some very bad movies in my time and this one is much closer to the excellent ones than the terrible ones.
That's not a "Christian film". That's a question many people ask themselves all the time. And that's what this movie is about... all the way through. It's about a man who has offered society immortality-- at a severe reduction in their emotions and free will-- and society accepted. But after a while some people began to wonder what we traded for that.
The film brings out several good points. First: there are always those who rebel, no matter what. It questions if eternal life is a good thing, or if death has a purpose. It definitely questioned reducing emotions and appreciation for life by extending that life indefinitely. Those are all sound science fiction themes-- and this is not the first story line to present such questions.
Neither does the film offer any answers. In the end some people make some choices, others make other choices. They don't show 200 years down the road. It's evidently not the goal of this film to make a statement. Rather, it's to pose a question: if given the choice of eternal life, would you take it... especially if there was a significant cost?
One of the points made by this film is that even a Utopian society might take the form of a Dystopian society under certain circumstances. I thought it did pretty well in presenting that concept.
The writing, directing and acting was reasonably good. It was a slow-burner and some viewers may be dissatisfied with the ending. It's not for everyone (I myself only give it a "mediocre" 5 stars). Yet I do see what they were trying to do: make us think. Make us question.
In the end there was still the major issue of which is worse: the society we live in now, or a less-motional, pristine society without crime, war, sickness, aging, or death. I would suspect that given the choice a lot of people would choose eternal youth and good health. Many people may agree that our society is excessively emotional anyway; maybe it could use a dialing-down from always on 10. What if we could eliminate all the things that plague our society today. Were the people in their society unhappy? Was the newfound "wonder" in the rebels worth what would undoubtedly follow: a return of greed, hatred, crime and eventually war?
These were all open-ended questions presented in this flick. I would have given this 6 or 7 stars, but the movie tended to be somewhat one-sided, and in my opinion failed to give "equal time" to the other side. They mentioned it, but let's mention it again: Before their "cure"... the world was a horrible, terrifying place filled with hatred, crime, war, disease and death. They put a stop to all of that. The people weren't walking zombies. They were cognizant, alert, happy. Is that so bad?
That's the ultimate question asked-- with no real answer provided. Perhaps it can be taken for granted that in another 200 to 300 years their civilization would have regressed, and would no longer be so civilized. Then perhaps there would be a rebellion of people thinking that eternal life and a balanced society wasn't such a bad thing after all.
So no, it wasn't a "Christian" movie. It was a reasonably decent sci fi movie that I wish had been fleshed out to present both sides in a little more balanced and through-provoking manner. It was the weakness and unbalance of the script that cost this film stars.
Cinematography---there were plenty of scenes to celebrate about, although this one sure is low budget, but no cheap frills here.
Story--there isn't any. There's just a forced premise that mortality is better, but no story development, no peak and valleys, just a tired plateau.
Verdict-- DO NOT WASTE YOUR TIME. Reading the news is more exciting.
Very bad editing and with some scenes you can see parts of the filming equipment. That scene on the balcony while she is walking and on the phone, when the camera angle changes you can clearly see the camera in front of her as she walks towards it, how HOW was this missed in editing or even during their proof screening.
Other reviews that are insulting people for not liking this movie must have been written by someone related to the film crew.
Its low budget, and if its not then its giving the impression it is.
CGI is ok.
The "pilot" looked strangely pregnant! (the pilot is a man) The story line is dull and parts of it done make sense at all.
Avoid!
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesThe name of the city, Alisandre comes from Alexander, which was derived from the Greek name, which means defender of men.
- Erros de gravaçãoArmaros' behavior towards The Pilot is odd. Armaros shouts at him, accuses him of inability to see or understand the gravity of the situation, sort of questions his competence and intentions. That is not the a way an employee can behave to a boss, let alone such a super boss.
- Citações
Logos: [Opening lines, voiceover] Once upon a time, the world was a mess. There was a pandemic, and then another and then another. Life, as the human race knew it, was a disaster in every sense of the word. Then, one day, a scientist came along with a genetic discovery that changed everything. He shared his vision with the world. It was a solution so incredible and epic in scope that life on Earth would not only resume but it would be like living in a fairytale. A chance to live in a perfect world. An eternal dream. The problem was no-one really thought through the consequences. Soon my life changes forever. I'll be given the gift of being frozen in time, the gift of never dying. A gift that everyone on this train and in this city either has or will receive. The problem is I'm not so sure I see it as a gift.
Principais escolhas
- How long is I Am Mortal?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Tempo de duração1 hora 23 minutos
- Cor
- Proporção
- 2.39:1