AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,3/10
5,6 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Três prodígios do Kung Fu tornaram-se homens de meia-idade agora a um pontapé de arrancar os tendões. Mas quando seu mestre é assassinado devem conciliar seus trabalhos sem futuro deveres pa... Ler tudoTrês prodígios do Kung Fu tornaram-se homens de meia-idade agora a um pontapé de arrancar os tendões. Mas quando seu mestre é assassinado devem conciliar seus trabalhos sem futuro deveres paternais e rancores antigos para vingar sua morte.Três prodígios do Kung Fu tornaram-se homens de meia-idade agora a um pontapé de arrancar os tendões. Mas quando seu mestre é assassinado devem conciliar seus trabalhos sem futuro deveres paternais e rancores antigos para vingar sua morte.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
- Prêmios
- 3 vitórias e 3 indicações no total
Avaliações em destaque
Its about a 7.5 IMHO. Standard base story we've all seen many times before (in stuff like Perfect Weapon, etc), but with the whole 'got old' brand of humour thrown in. Anyone who knows any kung fu will recognize many of the things that are lampooned gently, but it never gets mean in its humour, instead being quite respectful with the treatment of its subject matter.
Casting and characters are good, fight scenes were entertaining, and generally it was well paced. Better than any of the last few Karate Kid movies.
Casting and characters are good, fight scenes were entertaining, and generally it was well paced. Better than any of the last few Karate Kid movies.
The fighting was good, acting was good and comedy was actually funny. How is this movie boring? Don't listen to the bad reviews. If you like comedy and martial arts and not rated R stuff, this movie is for you.
Plenty of solid funny parts and the martials arts stunts were well done. Story was a little bit overblown and the movie was a tad longer than it needed to be. Worth watching if you like martial arts films though.
Paper Tiger is neither a great movie nor a bad movie..it lied somewhere in the average line to me.
The opening sequence and all did look promising but it was slow paced and sometimes engaging otherwise disengaging
It has a decent enough plot with some humor lingering all over which most of the time worked
The acting is decent and I am really glad that the director declined the inclusion of Bruce willis as a white male lead and to include Nicholas Cage as requested by hwood studios and went on to start a fundraiser and made an independent movie instead with an asian american as lead and with another Asian-American and a man of color as supporting leads
The action scenes were okay and the slow motion too was bearable
I can't say it's a proper entertainer for me becoz of the reasons I mentioned above but it's definitely a good movie in my eyes.... I will definitely re-watch it in the future and see if I can enjoy it a little bit more.
The opening sequence and all did look promising but it was slow paced and sometimes engaging otherwise disengaging
It has a decent enough plot with some humor lingering all over which most of the time worked
The acting is decent and I am really glad that the director declined the inclusion of Bruce willis as a white male lead and to include Nicholas Cage as requested by hwood studios and went on to start a fundraiser and made an independent movie instead with an asian american as lead and with another Asian-American and a man of color as supporting leads
The action scenes were okay and the slow motion too was bearable
I can't say it's a proper entertainer for me becoz of the reasons I mentioned above but it's definitely a good movie in my eyes.... I will definitely re-watch it in the future and see if I can enjoy it a little bit more.
This movie was a good watch. It wasn't anything crazy but it gave me a taste of what I was looking for, and then some. There was some great fighting scenes, jokes and comedy scenes that made me laugh, and the story, although a tad bit exaggerated, had me interested from beginning to end. The actors were likeable, and their flashbacks linking them to their younger selves looked good and helped me understand them a little more. I'd probably watch this movie again.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesWhen pitching the story to Hollywood studios, Hollywood wanted a white lead character to be played by Bruce Willis for $4 million dollars. They also wanted a role written for Nicolas Cage. The director and producers declined the offer and request because the script is originally about an Asian-American main character with a leading cast who are people of color. The team did not want to whitewash film, so they ended up going to Kickstarter to raise over $124,000 and had a few other investors to fund their independent film instead. (Source: The Daily Beast Op-Ed by Bao Tran; Seattle Channel Bao Tran interview)
- Erros de gravaçãoOne of home movies in the opening scenes is dated February 29, 1991. Indicating a leap year. But 1991 wasn't a leap year.
- ConexõesReferenced in Film Junk Podcast: Episode 814: Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings (2021)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is The Paper Tigers?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Los Tigres de Papel
- Locações de filme
- Canton Alley S, Seattle, Washington, EUA(Alley behind restaurant)
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 112.691
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 46.615
- 9 de mai. de 2021
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 118.351
- Tempo de duração1 hora 48 minutos
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 1.85 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was The Paper Tigers (2020) officially released in Japan in Japanese?
Responda