Amityville Exorcism
- 2017
- 1 h 17 min
AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
1,9/10
2,2 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaA family must put faith in a mysterious priest when a demonic force, connected to a decades-old murders in their home, possesses their daughter.A family must put faith in a mysterious priest when a demonic force, connected to a decades-old murders in their home, possesses their daughter.A family must put faith in a mysterious priest when a demonic force, connected to a decades-old murders in their home, possesses their daughter.
Ken Van Sant
- Charles Humes
- (as Ken Vansant)
Avaliações em destaque
I'm not going to waste your time with a wordy, well thought-out review. This movie was so bad, that it was funny. If that was their intention, then kudos. I laughed at this film more than I laugh at some of the "comedy" movies these days. From the "demon" with the cheap red Halloween costume, to the liquor bottles filled with water, this movie was hilarious.
Another film that was distributed by Wild Eye Releasing, the same company that's unleashed films like The Amazing Bulk and Shark Exorcist, yet this might be the worst film out of their entire catalog. This movie is such a disaster that the opening credits were made in iMovie. I'm not kidding, they use the exact same text effects that I've seen in the 2007 version of iMovie. There's also a lot of stock footage used in the movie as well, a lot of which I've seen on YouTube channels.
The problems with the editing doesn't stop there either. There is no color correction throughout the duration of the film, unless it was in the stock footage that they took for their feature film. Many of the scenes are either way too bright or way too dark, and it will either be distracting or laughable. There's also some random images that flash on the screen throughout the movie because... it's scary? Most of them are just a cheap attempt at a jumpscare, even when there's nothing suspenseful actually happening.
There's a scene where one of the priests (I can't remember any of the characters names and I don't care) is walking through a field and a picture of a skull flashes on the screen out of nowhere. That's how desperate this movie is to try and scare the audience. And when a movie is about possessed wooden planks, I can see why these were added. The intentionally ridiculous film Rubber makes more sense than this film.
The camerawork is some of the worst I have ever seen. There's a scene where the same priest is driving in his car and a bootleg monster from The Village appears, and there must have been no clear direction on set because the cameraman just shakes the camera all over the interior of the vehicle for no reason! It's not even handheld like a found footage film, it doesn't make any sense.
The sound design is awful, especially when Amy is swimming in the pool, and it sounds like they recorded the water splashing sound from 20 feet away. The music ranges from ripping off The Exorcist to tunes that make me wanna go deaf. Most of the actors in this movie read off the lines on the script with zero emotion. There's even a scene where Amy and her boyfriend are talking on the phone and it's supposed to be an emotional moment, but the boyfriend's actor seems unable to emote whatsoever and it becomes hilarious in all the wrong ways. The dialogue fares no better either.
The best part of this film is the cover, which is a lie as to the quality of the movie it's marketing. That and the few scenes that were so bad they made me laugh out loud, unfortunately those scenes aren't frequent enough for me to say it's worth seeing. The only scene I'd watch is the one where the red "demon" appears in a computer that they probably used to edit the movie, and the priest shoves the cross up against the screen and causes the entire computer to explode in a stock graphic, as that was easily the funniest part of the film. Other than that though, this is one of the few films that doesn't get anything right about film making, if you can even call it that. Consider this a 0/10, purely because I can't find a reason to give it a 1.
The problems with the editing doesn't stop there either. There is no color correction throughout the duration of the film, unless it was in the stock footage that they took for their feature film. Many of the scenes are either way too bright or way too dark, and it will either be distracting or laughable. There's also some random images that flash on the screen throughout the movie because... it's scary? Most of them are just a cheap attempt at a jumpscare, even when there's nothing suspenseful actually happening.
There's a scene where one of the priests (I can't remember any of the characters names and I don't care) is walking through a field and a picture of a skull flashes on the screen out of nowhere. That's how desperate this movie is to try and scare the audience. And when a movie is about possessed wooden planks, I can see why these were added. The intentionally ridiculous film Rubber makes more sense than this film.
The camerawork is some of the worst I have ever seen. There's a scene where the same priest is driving in his car and a bootleg monster from The Village appears, and there must have been no clear direction on set because the cameraman just shakes the camera all over the interior of the vehicle for no reason! It's not even handheld like a found footage film, it doesn't make any sense.
The sound design is awful, especially when Amy is swimming in the pool, and it sounds like they recorded the water splashing sound from 20 feet away. The music ranges from ripping off The Exorcist to tunes that make me wanna go deaf. Most of the actors in this movie read off the lines on the script with zero emotion. There's even a scene where Amy and her boyfriend are talking on the phone and it's supposed to be an emotional moment, but the boyfriend's actor seems unable to emote whatsoever and it becomes hilarious in all the wrong ways. The dialogue fares no better either.
The best part of this film is the cover, which is a lie as to the quality of the movie it's marketing. That and the few scenes that were so bad they made me laugh out loud, unfortunately those scenes aren't frequent enough for me to say it's worth seeing. The only scene I'd watch is the one where the red "demon" appears in a computer that they probably used to edit the movie, and the priest shoves the cross up against the screen and causes the entire computer to explode in a stock graphic, as that was easily the funniest part of the film. Other than that though, this is one of the few films that doesn't get anything right about film making, if you can even call it that. Consider this a 0/10, purely because I can't find a reason to give it a 1.
The Amityville Exorcism (2017):
I hate all the Amityville B Grade movies.All of them are so terrible except Amityville Asylum which is also a bad movie but better than others.So I gave this exorcism a try.So how is it?
Plot: Terrible
Plus Points: Whaaaattttttttttt....No Way......
Minus Points: In every Possible Way..
So,Amityville Asylum is awful at all levels and simply a terrible watch.
My rating 1/10 (Please allow 0 option too)
I hate all the Amityville B Grade movies.All of them are so terrible except Amityville Asylum which is also a bad movie but better than others.So I gave this exorcism a try.So how is it?
Plot: Terrible
Plus Points: Whaaaattttttttttt....No Way......
Minus Points: In every Possible Way..
So,Amityville Asylum is awful at all levels and simply a terrible watch.
My rating 1/10 (Please allow 0 option too)
Amityville has been tagged onto plenty of horrors in an attempt to gain credibility and the majority have been terrible, this however is by far the worst.
Watching these 76 minutes was beyond a chore, it was cruel and unusual punishment. I believe in sitting all the way through a film, this is one of those times I regret it.
Hyper low budget with a fittingly poor cast, soundtrack, editor and director. The cinematography is some of the worst I've seen and the whole thing was painful to watch.
It tells the story of a priest called in to save a possessed girl in a house that contains some of the wood from the original Amityville house.
The movie has no redeeming qualities beyond the cover. Staring at that cover art for 76 minutes would be more entertaining.
The Good:
Great cover
The Bad:
AWFUL acting
Dreadful cinematography
Random flashing images are moronic
Hilariously bad soundtrack
Dumb, dumb, dumb
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
Drinking Jager from the bottle during the day suggests the person is scummy.....or lucky
Watching these 76 minutes was beyond a chore, it was cruel and unusual punishment. I believe in sitting all the way through a film, this is one of those times I regret it.
Hyper low budget with a fittingly poor cast, soundtrack, editor and director. The cinematography is some of the worst I've seen and the whole thing was painful to watch.
It tells the story of a priest called in to save a possessed girl in a house that contains some of the wood from the original Amityville house.
The movie has no redeeming qualities beyond the cover. Staring at that cover art for 76 minutes would be more entertaining.
The Good:
Great cover
The Bad:
AWFUL acting
Dreadful cinematography
Random flashing images are moronic
Hilariously bad soundtrack
Dumb, dumb, dumb
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
Drinking Jager from the bottle during the day suggests the person is scummy.....or lucky
Você sabia?
- Erros de gravaçãoWhen the father is sitting at the kitchen table surrounded by whiskey bottles, all of the liquid in the bottles is clear. Whiskey is not clear. Also, he is later shown guzzling clear liquid out of a Jägermeister bottle. Jäger is not clear either.
- ConexõesReferenced in In Praise of Shadows: The History of Insane Asylums and Horror Movies (2022)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
- Tempo de duração1 hora 17 minutos
- Cor
- Proporção
- 1.78 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was Amityville Exorcism (2017) officially released in Canada in English?
Responda