AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
7,0/10
3,2 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Examina as origens do universo, incluindo o início da vida na Terra.Examina as origens do universo, incluindo o início da vida na Terra.Examina as origens do universo, incluindo o início da vida na Terra.
- Prêmios
- 1 indicação no total
Theo Bongani Ndyalvane
- Early Human
- (as Theophilus Bongani Ndyalvane)
Avaliações em destaque
As a scientist myself I enjoy this type of documentaries. I have watched plenty of documentary series on the universe and I always search for more bcs my kids like them as well. I can say without any hesitation that this was one of the worst I have ever watched. Very dull and boring
Zero explanation.
I have watched youtube videos far more interesting.
I did not watch it on IMAX. Maybe there ,the cinematic experience would be better.
But on TV is is almost unbearable to watch.
I am really disappointed.
I have watched youtube videos far more interesting.
I did not watch it on IMAX. Maybe there ,the cinematic experience would be better.
But on TV is is almost unbearable to watch.
I am really disappointed.
Nothing new, visually or otherwise. It's not even boring, it's just plain dull and unengaging. Watched it on MUBI and the best they could do apparently was 1080p, so I got to see all the artefacts and downsampling that just rendered it practically unwatchable. Just watch BBC's Planet Earth or Cosmos instead.
A very slow film with little narration. The CGI blends seamlessly and is undetectable. Many (scientific) inaccuracies though, either from artistic expression or from ignorance. I viewed this at the Smithsonian's laser iMAX for $9. What I thought would be the highlight of my trip to Washington turned out to be the trough. This was the newest iMAX film there (and made especially for the Air & Space Museum?) and with the most renowned director and narrator. I only realized afterwards why it had only a single showing compared to the other films. The iMAX theater was not any better than the one back home, and I dozed off a few times.
This film does not require much of a description... or, rather, it kind of defies it. However, given the paucity of extant reviews at time of writing, I thought I'd throw in my 2 shekels worth (NB: Nothing worse than few or zero reviews for one to scope out a potential viewing with... and without the ye olde forums to call upon for forewarning, going in blind is very risky nowadays).
'Voyage of Time' is essentially the hypnotic space sequences of Kubrick's 1968 seminal work, combined with 'HD Star Gaze'-type spacescape porn, and a sprinkling of the trademark Malick, meandering copy pasta (*the shtick is now getting to the point of overuse, that it almost feels vacuous... no "flowing curtains" here, though) thrown in for, err... coherence(?).
Do not see this expecting another 'Thin Red Line' or 'Days of Heaven' ― this is seemingly far more of an indulgence for Malick, than anything approaching an opus. The film is good ― do not misconstrue. It's just that it's more a spacescape with some evanescent Blanchett ruminations about "mutter" (?) ― then book-ended with an Australian aboriginal (perhaps inspired by the {vocal} presence of said actress... dunno) take on the '2001' director's famous "chimpanzee / Monolith" scenes ― than a film with a coherent tale underpinning its wistful veneer. There is a narrative one can interpolate here, but it's a 'each to their own' kind of offering.
I feel asleep watching this (twice)... But only because of how dreamy its visuals were; not because it was boring per se.
My God! It's made of 8 stars / 10.
'Voyage of Time' is essentially the hypnotic space sequences of Kubrick's 1968 seminal work, combined with 'HD Star Gaze'-type spacescape porn, and a sprinkling of the trademark Malick, meandering copy pasta (*the shtick is now getting to the point of overuse, that it almost feels vacuous... no "flowing curtains" here, though) thrown in for, err... coherence(?).
Do not see this expecting another 'Thin Red Line' or 'Days of Heaven' ― this is seemingly far more of an indulgence for Malick, than anything approaching an opus. The film is good ― do not misconstrue. It's just that it's more a spacescape with some evanescent Blanchett ruminations about "mutter" (?) ― then book-ended with an Australian aboriginal (perhaps inspired by the {vocal} presence of said actress... dunno) take on the '2001' director's famous "chimpanzee / Monolith" scenes ― than a film with a coherent tale underpinning its wistful veneer. There is a narrative one can interpolate here, but it's a 'each to their own' kind of offering.
I feel asleep watching this (twice)... But only because of how dreamy its visuals were; not because it was boring per se.
My God! It's made of 8 stars / 10.
10pyblain
It's astonishing how fortunate we are to feel the way we do when watching nature unfold. This majestic and ethereal spectacle that warms our hearts. If beauty is in the eye of the beholder, we must feel infinitely thankful for how evolution shaped us in a way that lets us marvel so profoundly at nature.
The more we learn about how humans work, how society works, how civilization works, how biology and physics work, how the collapse of a star will impact distant galaxies, the more we realize that everything is connected. Time and space is one sandbox in which infinitely small events play with other ones of unbounded cosmological proportions, all in a perfectly deterministic manner.
This teaches us that the only way we can feel what we're all truly looking for, which is to be loved, is to show our love to the world. To show it to other people, to animals, to plants, to the wind, to nature. Because nature is everything there is to know, and love. Because you are nature. Because loving nature is loving yourself. And the more you will learn about the world, the more this will all make sense.
This is what this movie is about.
The more we learn about how humans work, how society works, how civilization works, how biology and physics work, how the collapse of a star will impact distant galaxies, the more we realize that everything is connected. Time and space is one sandbox in which infinitely small events play with other ones of unbounded cosmological proportions, all in a perfectly deterministic manner.
This teaches us that the only way we can feel what we're all truly looking for, which is to be loved, is to show our love to the world. To show it to other people, to animals, to plants, to the wind, to nature. Because nature is everything there is to know, and love. Because you are nature. Because loving nature is loving yourself. And the more you will learn about the world, the more this will all make sense.
This is what this movie is about.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesTwo versions were made: a 45-minute IMAX version with Brad Pitt narrating and a 90-minute 35mm version with Cate Blanchett narrating, titled Voyage of Time: Life's Journey (2016). As of 2021, the "Life's Journey" version has yet to be released in the United States.
- Versões alternativasTwo versions were made: a 45-minute IMAX version with Brad Pitt narrating and a 90-minute 35mm version with Cate Blanchett narrating, titled Voyage of Time: Life's Journey (2016).
- ConexõesVersion of Voyage of Time: Life's Journey (2016)
- Trilhas sonorasSymphony No. 9 in D Minor ('Choral')
Composed Ludwig van Beethoven
Performed by Nicolaus Esterházy Sinfonia and Chorus
Conducted by Bela Drahos
Courtesy of Naxos
By arrangement with Source/Q
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Voyage of Time?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Voyage of Time: An IMAX Documentary
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 55.409
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 55.409
- 9 de out. de 2016
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 337.038
- Tempo de duração
- 44 min
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente