Avaliações de usuários

I got more then 1600$ saved up, i can go to a junkyard, put a toy on my back and pretend its a post apocalyptic movie...

This is how insane 2019 has become, anyone can put a movie out there no matter how bad it is.

And this one a part the cover art that seems good, is a real piece of junk.

Wow, where to start.....

This is undoubtedly the worst movie I've ever seen. Having said that, I kept laughing throughout the entire film.

First off, the scenery depicted in the still for this movie is 100% misleading to how intrigued you believe the setting for this movie will be. There are two major locations for this film. The first being a scant trailer park in which the main character piddles around for half the movie. Then our "hero" journeys to an abondoned shack with some tents thrown up around it because a half of a poorly made robot convinced him to. Superbly lackluster.

The second thing I would like to bring up is the camera work. It may have you laughing at some of the director's choices. Albeit the overly long shots of the main character eating or sleeping, which can go on so long you feel like your awkwardly watching a live voyeur feed, or the shaky "a camera stand wasn't in the budget" shots. At one point it almost seems like the cameraman tripped while filming. Pretty good stuff.

Lastly I want to bring up the acting, or rather the lack thereof. They could not have picked a better person who intentionally seems like they've never even heard the word acting. $20 says it was the directors best friend. Every other character in the movie had exponentially better acting chops than this guy. Every time he ate something he had to nod in acceptance while he chewed, as if to say, "mmm, this is pretty good," and he ate a lot. My personal favorite scene is the minute plus he spent stumbling around pretending to be sick.

I will definitely be watching the sequel.

At the moment the score for this mmovie is 7/10. Bu thte correc t score should be less than 2/10. I think the makers of this movie is using a click circle or a paid service to boost the ratings.

This is a horrible movie. do not waste your time watching this. There is nothing, not at least a good story

Seriously, the movie maker intentionally waste 1.5 hour of millions of people's time.

Post Apocalyptic movies are one of my favorite genres.

But man, this was a touch watch.

So many plot holes, the gun fights are mind boggling, and the stupidity of the main character makes it completely unrealistic that this dude would survive 5 minutes in his environment.

This movie is just as bad as the video games themselves, and I'd suggest avoiding wasting your time.

As a time waster, it's a 10 star. As a Post Apocalyptic movie, it's a 0

It doesn't cover the loss of my time. when I go see a movie, I expect to be entertained, not irritated. whoever likes the movies must have nothing else to do in life!!!!

Absolutely the worst written, directed and acted movie ever, and that's being charitable. Only redeeming value is the mountain setting, which reminded me of Saylor Park, Colorado where I used to hike.

I played the division quite a bit this was pretty cool. I love how they got together and made a movie. We need to promote more positivity in this World. Way to go guys.

Because things came up, I had to watch this over two evenings, first half one night, second half the next. In between the two viewings, I found myself thinking a great deal about the scenario. A young guy named Dylan, who's not too bright, is on his own at a Red Cross station after a viral outbreak has killed off most of the country. Unsure what to do or where to go, he kills a lot of time throwing a ball against a wall, or pretending he's driving a get-a-way car in some action movie scenario, until a robot ends up on his "doorstep." To keep this spoiler free, I'll just say this robot convinces him to travel to a safe zone. Alone most of the movie, Dylan and the robot talk, and we learn more about Dylan as well as the viral outbreak and the reasons for it. In addition, a sort of "relationship" grows between the two, though not a healthy one, as you might expect from AI.

There's been quite a few mean-spirited reviews that were unnecessarily harsh. This is a low budget film from, what I gather, a new director, and it did have some problems. The writing and pacing were off, it took far too long before the "hero" set out on his journey, and in many places the action drags. Instead of Dylan just playing in the junked cars, or walking around the woods, those sections could have been shortened and additional obstacles could've been thrown up when he was walking to the safe area.

Another problem was that the lead was inexperienced, and he often mistook loudness for intensity. This might not matter in other films, but he was the only person in most of the movie, so it's important that he be compelling, and sometimes he wasn't. But, to be fair, he really did create a believable, three dimensional character. And what's unusual, is that in these movies with just one person in difficult situations, the cliche is to present a character who is intelligent, educated, and probably deep. Dylan is, to be honest, just an ordinary doofus. In addition, it's really, really hard to act against nothing. Throughout most of the film the lead was talking to a robot, a hunk of wire and metal, not to a real human being. Trying to create emotions in that kind of scenario must have been difficult and often frustrating. Even a highly experienced actor would have a hard time doing that.

This movie has flaws, and you might find it dragging in some places, but it's worth watching. I'd like to see a sequel, to see what happens to Dylan in this new world, after being separated from people for so long.

Junior High School Weekend Project (maybe lower, Elementary School).

Post Apocalypse

Generation Y or Generation Z absolutely no brains, no survival skills.

No more Mommy and Daddy to live with to provide food, nor pay the Rent and Utilities.

No more Internet, Smartphones to "Just Google It" or watch a youtube DIY video.

Is there anyway to rate this negative stars?

How do I get a refund of an hour and fifty minutes of my life back?

I don't know if the producer of this film will read this review, but I signed up on IMDb just to do this so, listen up. This is your target demographic speaking here....

The first rule of a film is to get your audience to enjoy "the suspension of disbelief" so we can get caught up in your film. I found that absolutely impossible to do. A good film/ story creates the suspension of disbelief effortlessly. Meaning, it happens automatically and we easily look past anything unbelievable or past any poor production values or plot points. BUT This film was sooooo bad that I had to TRY WAY TOO HARD, to get past so many things, just to get through to the end. But since I like a good try by a film maker, I pushed past the home depot robot with a billion dollar artificial intelligence and the $50 body. - I pushed past the same hand writing style and the 2 paint colors used on all the graffiti and missing persons board. ( I guess you only had one guy and 2 cans of spray paint) - I pushed on even through the 1/3 full, taped shut,red cross boxes.

I get it! money is hard to come by for productions, and corners must be cut in order to get a film completed. In fact, I labored very hard to ignore anything that I felt was due to lack of money for production. I mean Geez, with just the cost of the one camera, audio recording and editing, music score recording and all the amount of time invested, I'm sure the money was hard to come by. So I waive ALL reasons for this film sucking that have to do with money, OK?

In fact, personally, I wouldn't judge this film poorly just because it seemed that this film was made utilizing a 1980s Sony hand-cam with a broken built in mic! Because you had a decent Idea.... Man against AI in a post apocalyptic world. OK Ill give it a try. You got me!

So Budget aside, where does that leave me (us)? It leaves us with -the writing, -acting, -editing and -directing. to tell a story that entertains. Well, the only entertainment I received, and am receiving now, is reviewing this waste of your effort!

-THE WRITING: Was there any? Yes. There must have been, because I can see the attempt to follow some kind of story arc. " Young, killer-virus survivor, lonely, and pretty stupid, acquires half a robot, and is tricked into falling into a trap devised by the evil Dr. Amherst, who plans (for some reason) to reduce the world population to 2 million. (Why not everybody?). But most of the dialog seemed like it was just poorly improvised.

-THE DIRECTING: Sooo weak. the attempt to draw us into the mind of this moron with music and sound effects and slow motion was so intentional, and distracting that it had the opposite effect on me. I was repelled. And had to force myself to continue,to see if there was anything I was missing that might be redeeming. There wasn't.

-THE EDITING: This one is a little harder. Because I'm not sure if the overly loooong boring shots of ..........walking, opening spray painted boxes, beard trimming, or the stealing from "I am Legend" in the talking to a mannequin scene (here, a cardboard woman named "Boo?"), AND, let's not forget 20 minutes of walking bent over to look sick....... was chosen by the editor or the director. Whoever made those choices committed the worst crime against an audience. you wasted our time.

-THE ACTING: YAY IM HERE! The pinnacle of my review! All of the acting by all of the actors except one, was acceptable... Who know maybe even great! I'm not sure because this was such a mess, I was disoriented. So all but ONE actor get a passing grade, (as if my opinion means anything). AND WHO WOULD THAT ACTOR BE???....... Oh. ONLY the LEAD ACTOR!!! Holy SH#t, did he SUCK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! When he was supposed to be funny. he was LAME. When he was supposed to be serious, he was the worst kind of mediocre! What a FULL toolbox of acting tools he has... Shrugging,,,looking like he was trying to look frustrated... The heart-breaking scene where he thought the robot was his friend!, I could actually FEEL the inner turmoil he was going thru while trying to dredge up any acting skills whatsoever, during that scene!

I am currently talking to lawyers to see if it is legal to SUE the film makers to get back my wasted time!

I gave the film EVERY CHANCE. I forgave EVERY mistake. Waived every possible excuse aside, that may have just been beyond your budget. And in the end, is there anything left that gives us any type of memorable feeling or reward for all our generosity in watching this abortion? I mean like anything? For instance, did you, AT LEAST, end on a predictable cliche that works, so we could have ANY type of reward??? For example... At the very end,did one of the guys in the INTEL suits, pull off his gas mask, to reveal that it actually was his father who was saving him??? NO!!! not even a tiny little payoff, for us laboring thru this steaming pile of digital dung!

This is not a future low budget cult film, its not even a good, bad film.

ON THE OTHER HAND, IF THIS WAS MADE BY A 13 YEAR OLD KID DURING SUMMER VACA. I apologize. Good job, Timmy.

Q: Did I enjoy ANY of it? A: NO

Q: Would I recommend watching it? A: Cmon! YOU know!

Q: So to sum up, I give this film 5 stars and suggest you enter it in the Caans Film Festival. I personally offer 100 million to fund it.

A: NO

This is a very bad movie. How on earth does it have a 6.8 rating on IMDB? Totally fake reviews.

I have watched bad movies. This checks all the boxes. Bad acting Bad story line Bad characters A Successful failure

Ugh. This is possibly the slowest film I've ever watched. The core idea wasn't bad, but the execution was terrible. Plot holes and illogical scenes are riddled through the film.

The Acting was bad. The Language was worse. The Message - is coming to a town near you...soon?

I do not think that this movie deserves all the bad reviews. I don't live in a desert eight stars but I did that to compensate for all the ridiculously low reviews this movie had gotten.this movie was obviously done on a very low budget. It was exciting to see some of the choices they made to do this at a very low cost.there were times the movie drug on and times it didn't need to. There were times when the acting was off. But the story was interesting and I love the ending.Honestly I couldn't stop watching it. The times when it lagged on I would just fast forward 10 or 20 seconds ahead. It was really hard to like the protagonist. And I wonder if that was intentional. And you have to wonder if his family left him behind on purpose. What we saw were indications character was morally low and lacked initiative.it makes you wonder what it was like for him in a family environment. Was he an addict that would not recover? Was he someone that stole from others? Was he someone that made living with him a very difficult to the point that they had to decide to cut him away? I really like this movie and hope this director makes another.I did like the actor too and would like to see him once he's had some more acting lessons. There were definite times that they were over-reaching on the acting, but that was easily overlooked.to me this seem like a low budget film done by someone who is passionate to make it regardless of the challenges! And that means a lot to me as a movie lover.

No doubt you've breezed through other reviews here and noticed a slew of 1's. My 6 is not to counteract this low score, but is my true assessment of this movie based on its ability to entertain. Sure, the lead actor is a bit unconvincing but who's to say what would be proper? He's doing his thing in his nerdy awkward style and I will give him that. Little things happen along the way of course (it is a movie) and enough remained to keep me curious and watching, despite the slow progression. When it was done I did not feel my time was wasted. Sometimes the little ideas make for the better movies, regardless of budget. And in this case the broken robot was believable enough, even though it looked like it was made with a meccano set and spray paint. The low budget was almost immediately obvious, so I overlooked the things that would have normally drawn me out of the narrative in a higher budget movie. For instance, there would be lots of weeds growing beside train tracks in a post-apocalyptic future. Not here! One little instance I managed to catch upon pausing the video though, a computer's boot up screen flashed a copyright date of 2035 and that made me happy. Well done, guys!

The cover art is the only thing good about this film. There isn't a better work to describe this movie than GARBAGE. I got through the first hour, I made myself. Then I looked it up & read the reviews. The bad reviews are the correct reviews. I finished it because I started it & that's the way I am. I hate I started it because I felt I had to finish it & it was very hard to sit through. Boring, TERRIBLE Acting, Plot Holes, props were garbage, the set was terrible, visual effects were poop, so many unanswered questions, did I mention TERRIBLE ACTING. The Robot was a better actor than the main characters acting, & the robots acting was garbage. The video quality is even garbage. They could of recorded the entire movie with an iphone or samsung phone & it would of been better. There is only 2 things I can say good about this movie #1 the Cover Art is absolutely BEAUTIFUL (the main reason I watched it) #2 The plot twist at the was pretty good, but a lot of people including myself seen it coming a mile away. If you are still reading this review you are looking for any reason to watch it, there isn't one, Yes it really is that bad.

I've seen YouTube video "productions" with even smaller budgets that were leaps and bounds better acted, directed and produced than this pile of garbage.

Indie? More like crappy!