Infidelidade perigosa

Our world seems to thrive on making stupid movies with even stupider lead women. Walk away, walk away!

I agree with mgconlan-1. I would only watch this movie because handsome Canadian actor Marcus Rosner is in it. If Marcus Rosner did not appear in this film, I would NOT bother watching it at all. His body looks very good shirtless. He is the only guy that would interest me in that film. I would want him for a husband instead of Greg (Laura's spouse). Greg is not really my type for a husband. He was kind of boring! The stupidest part of the movie was when the internet café owner gives Laura the information of where his customer (Winnie) lives. If I were the guy's internet café customer, I would be furious. Also, I would not want Laura to know where I live!

Having watched the entire film to see how it ends I can only say the film started off lousy and only progressed downward from an already lousy beginning. I don't care if the actors/actresses agreed to work for free, and the director picked up this script from the "Buy 1 and get 3 scripts free" bin this is just so boring that I cannot pick out even one scene where the dialogue was worthy to be edited in.

Who would even accept responsibility for putting their career ending name to this piece of junk? The film genre is listed as a Thriller much like the (1987) Fatal Attraction was which includes a love triangle that goes terribly wrong where the innocent and unsuspecting spouse is threatened by the unscrupulous scorned third party lover. Sound familiar? Well "Infidelity In Suburbia" is the end result of one person watching the original (1987) Fatal Attraction, and passing the film content by word of mouth from a first person 1 through person 1,000 and what you have left of a half decent film is this diluted piece of junk.

The ending if I told you what happened, would not be considered a spoiler, because the entire film is spoiled from beginning to end. After investing 90 minutes just to watch a terrible ending that I would rather have washed the dinner dishes and thrown out the garbage instead of wasting my time watching this garbage.

I give it two thumbs down because I only have two thumbs.

...first at all..my girlfriend choose this film to watch...she liked soap-style movies with a bit of thrill....my pain barrier is high....but after aprox. 20 minutes i had to stand up and go to the back porch,because the movie is so trashy (in the very bad way..not like trashy but GOOD..acting,script,etc)...even my girlfriend came in a few minutes later...what a sick-making movie..waste of time and lost of good mood !! CONCLUSION : Don´t watch this movie,...its completely rubbish and disgustig in every sense,trust me ( i can´t remember watch a movie wich is even more worse)

This film begins with a bored housewife by the name of "Laura Halpern" (Sarah Butler) starting to suspect that her husband "Greg Halpern" (Peter Benson) is having an affair with his secretary "Hannah Jonkins" (Lucie Guest). At around the same time, she meets a young man named "Elliott Graverston" (Marcus Rosner) who agrees to work as a handyman on a project in her kitchen. One thing eventually leads to another, and Laura has an affair with him which she quickly comes to regret. Unfortunately, Elliott doesn't particularly respond well to her request to break things off between them and things quickly take a turn for the worse from that point on. Now, rather than reveal any more, I will just say that this was one of those films that relied upon both suspense and eroticism but, because of it's made-for-television format, was somewhat limited in that regard. It does, however, feature a good performance by Sarah Butler who definitely stood out from all of the other actors. That being said, however, she wasn't quite able to overcome the rather mediocre plot and for that reason I have rated this movie accordingly. Slightly below average.