Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaCensored scenes restored, bold ideas returned, episodes re-edited to match original scripts, never seen before material, as Creators Dan D'or and Phil Jackson wanted, but were blocked the fi... Ler tudoCensored scenes restored, bold ideas returned, episodes re-edited to match original scripts, never seen before material, as Creators Dan D'or and Phil Jackson wanted, but were blocked the first time around.Censored scenes restored, bold ideas returned, episodes re-edited to match original scripts, never seen before material, as Creators Dan D'or and Phil Jackson wanted, but were blocked the first time around.
Explorar episódios
Avaliações em destaque
Well I'm just a few episodes in but it reminds me of a badly done Firefly. I will soldier on and see.
This is so ridiculous that it is hilarious fun if you like scifi. The story is interesting and unique especially for 2000. The acting is pretty bad but enjoyable. The special effects are 1980's style mixed with 1990's style. I personally can look beyond bad special effects. There are some great actors with horrible lines. If you like campy scifi with a good story, you will like this show.
Redux is proclaimed as the original vision, minus the interference from censorship cuts.
From watching just the first episode, and remembering that other titles that pushed boundaries in first episode were also censored on re-release (looking at you SG-1 'Children of the Gods'), but in a post Spartacus and Game of Thrones world, the more 'adult' nature of the Redux edit is pretty tame.
As is the 3D CGI, in a post-Battlestar Galactica era, showing more a limitation of budget then any lack of skill, with the look being fairly consistent, though perhaps not matched to the style of the live action sequences in the way Babylon5 was.
On a technical level, the one item that really jars is the audio transitions for music and background atmospherics between scenes. There is none. It's jarring to the ears, while the sound within scenes is consistent, minus the odd obvious ADR dropped in.
For fans, this will be interesting to watch, for the newcomer they'll be laughing at the overall quality, as it doesn't compare to even current Indie projects, thanks to the march of production technologies.
This is a decidedly Pre-HD romp, loosing the battle to survive in a 4K world.
As is the 3D CGI, in a post-Battlestar Galactica era, showing more a limitation of budget then any lack of skill, with the look being fairly consistent, though perhaps not matched to the style of the live action sequences in the way Babylon5 was.
On a technical level, the one item that really jars is the audio transitions for music and background atmospherics between scenes. There is none. It's jarring to the ears, while the sound within scenes is consistent, minus the odd obvious ADR dropped in.
For fans, this will be interesting to watch, for the newcomer they'll be laughing at the overall quality, as it doesn't compare to even current Indie projects, thanks to the march of production technologies.
This is a decidedly Pre-HD romp, loosing the battle to survive in a 4K world.
10krelat
I recently discovered the pilot for Nobility (on Amazon), which I'd recommend as a sci-fi story that tries to be different. However, despite its all-star cast, I was sad to find out that it never got picked up as a series. It's very campy, very low-budget, like a couple other cheap sci-fi things on Netflix and Amazon. At first my reaction was "ick", then it was "I'm bored", but I kept watching and I became very interested by the end. I realized I wanted more of this. I like high-budget, high-end science fiction just fine, like Star Trek: Discovery or The Orville. But sometimes I want to watch something unchallenging and soothing, the equivalent of baby food.
Starhunter gives me exactly what I was looking for. Be warned! The pilot is the worst episode by far. The rest make much more sense. The second one isn't as good as the others, but after that they quickly increase in quality and scope, with tons of things happening at once in each story.
Each episode so far has been divided with some people on the ship and some on the ground during a mission, but unlike something like Star Trek where the planet and the ship can feel like two completely different A and B stories, in Starhunter the two plots are much more tightly woven together, making a feeling that you're watching one continuous coherent piece of action. This creates a stunning sensation of breadth and unpredictability which I frankly find more exciting than a lot of big name sci-fi which has fancy lights and swearing but keeps the plot underneath far too safe and predictable.
If you're into video games, maybe I could say that instead of this being Star Wars Battlefront or Elite Dangerous, it's more like Evochron Mercenary or the X series of games. Meaning, rough around the edges, unapologetically ugly in the graphics department, but focused more on all the little details, all the little bits and bobs, than its more expensively produced cousins.
Instead of dragging you by the nose and then forcibly directing your eyes to the important attractions, Starhunter trusts you to figure out what you'd like to focus on, out of a menagerie of character traits and world details. It doesn't fight for your attention like modern stuff, it's understated. But I like that better. I never liked being told what parts I should care about (I'm looking at you, Killjoys).
To compare it to other series, I'd say it's a lot like Farscape but with self-contained plots, one for each episode. Farscape started having many-episodes long stories, almost like Dragon Ball Z in how some episodes would focus on a single conversation between hero and villain. None of that here. It's Andromeda but with more action (less likely to fall asleep, at least once you get past the first episodes), Lexx with more focus on actually doing things quickly, Crusade with more interesting situations, Earth: Final Conflict but camper (yes, campier. somehow.). Hopefully those comparisons give you some idea of what to expect.
Now I have to come to terms with knowing that there's never going to be any more of it. :( I didn't realize it was a remastering of one of the 2000s-era shows, I thought it was a complete reboot but in the style of early-2000s shows (including bad 3D scenes for authenticity). I thought it had a chance of being renewed and continuing. Sob. We could use a cheesy series like this in our all-too-serious world some days!
Conclusion: Don't go based on your first impression, second impression, nor your third, fourth, or fifth. Wait until you've come up with a half-dozen or so different reactions to the show. Reserve a weekend and watch at least three episodes. If you still don't like it, shake your fist and curse my review for misleading you. But I hope you'll find something you like. All I know is that I can PROMISE you won't know whether or not you like it until you've seen a few episodes. Expect sci-fi comfort food type fluff, and you won't be disappointed.
Starhunter Redux is totally fluff, but it's the fluffiest fluff I've found yet. :)
Starhunter gives me exactly what I was looking for. Be warned! The pilot is the worst episode by far. The rest make much more sense. The second one isn't as good as the others, but after that they quickly increase in quality and scope, with tons of things happening at once in each story.
Each episode so far has been divided with some people on the ship and some on the ground during a mission, but unlike something like Star Trek where the planet and the ship can feel like two completely different A and B stories, in Starhunter the two plots are much more tightly woven together, making a feeling that you're watching one continuous coherent piece of action. This creates a stunning sensation of breadth and unpredictability which I frankly find more exciting than a lot of big name sci-fi which has fancy lights and swearing but keeps the plot underneath far too safe and predictable.
If you're into video games, maybe I could say that instead of this being Star Wars Battlefront or Elite Dangerous, it's more like Evochron Mercenary or the X series of games. Meaning, rough around the edges, unapologetically ugly in the graphics department, but focused more on all the little details, all the little bits and bobs, than its more expensively produced cousins.
Instead of dragging you by the nose and then forcibly directing your eyes to the important attractions, Starhunter trusts you to figure out what you'd like to focus on, out of a menagerie of character traits and world details. It doesn't fight for your attention like modern stuff, it's understated. But I like that better. I never liked being told what parts I should care about (I'm looking at you, Killjoys).
To compare it to other series, I'd say it's a lot like Farscape but with self-contained plots, one for each episode. Farscape started having many-episodes long stories, almost like Dragon Ball Z in how some episodes would focus on a single conversation between hero and villain. None of that here. It's Andromeda but with more action (less likely to fall asleep, at least once you get past the first episodes), Lexx with more focus on actually doing things quickly, Crusade with more interesting situations, Earth: Final Conflict but camper (yes, campier. somehow.). Hopefully those comparisons give you some idea of what to expect.
Now I have to come to terms with knowing that there's never going to be any more of it. :( I didn't realize it was a remastering of one of the 2000s-era shows, I thought it was a complete reboot but in the style of early-2000s shows (including bad 3D scenes for authenticity). I thought it had a chance of being renewed and continuing. Sob. We could use a cheesy series like this in our all-too-serious world some days!
Conclusion: Don't go based on your first impression, second impression, nor your third, fourth, or fifth. Wait until you've come up with a half-dozen or so different reactions to the show. Reserve a weekend and watch at least three episodes. If you still don't like it, shake your fist and curse my review for misleading you. But I hope you'll find something you like. All I know is that I can PROMISE you won't know whether or not you like it until you've seen a few episodes. Expect sci-fi comfort food type fluff, and you won't be disappointed.
Starhunter Redux is totally fluff, but it's the fluffiest fluff I've found yet. :)
Definite inspiration for elements of firefly - Percy is Kaylee in every way, the Raiders are similar to Reevers, weaponry fire bullets not lasers, there is a back story of a great war, the 2nd in command is a women with military background.
Plots are decent but scripts and music are reminiscent of Hercules and Xena. Editing is appalling with scenes clipped too short at times and special effects are like something made in a 1980's camcorder however, pushing through these down points there is certainly a decent programme underneith worth watching.
Plots are decent but scripts and music are reminiscent of Hercules and Xena. Editing is appalling with scenes clipped too short at times and special effects are like something made in a 1980's camcorder however, pushing through these down points there is certainly a decent programme underneith worth watching.
Você sabia?
- Versões alternativasStarhunter ReduX was formerly of the working title Starhunter the Creators' Cut.
- ConexõesEdited from Starhunter (2000)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How many seasons does Starhunter Redux have?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Centrais de atendimento oficiais
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Starhunter Redux
- Locações de filme
- Toronto, Ontário, Canadá(Back-shooting for eps 201 to 222)
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração43 minutos
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was Starhunter ReduX (2017) officially released in India in English?
Responda