AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
6,4/10
2,5 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaRiley lands herself a new job via a case of mistaken identity, and her first assignment is to accompany her new boss on a trip to save a failing toy factory.Riley lands herself a new job via a case of mistaken identity, and her first assignment is to accompany her new boss on a trip to save a failing toy factory.Riley lands herself a new job via a case of mistaken identity, and her first assignment is to accompany her new boss on a trip to save a failing toy factory.
Avaliações em destaque
Sure, it was corny and formulaic, but that's exactly what I love about Hallmark movies. They're clean, have mild religious overtones, no sex, maybe just a kiss at the end. Riley talks about her family attending Midnight Mass. Love that. I believe people crave these types of movies rather than Hollywood filth with their obligatory premarital sex scenes.
Riley is an appealing character, and she carried the film She's a little tart, not too mushy, not too gorgeous, but a nice down-to- earth girl you'd love for her to invite you to her parents' home for Christmas. The male lead wasn't as strong. The story wasn't all that strong, but I don't care. I liked it, and wanted to watch it until the end.
Riley is an appealing character, and she carried the film She's a little tart, not too mushy, not too gorgeous, but a nice down-to- earth girl you'd love for her to invite you to her parents' home for Christmas. The male lead wasn't as strong. The story wasn't all that strong, but I don't care. I liked it, and wanted to watch it until the end.
We'll just go with this: the officer who pulled over Mr Young claims to be the sheriff. Yet the squad car and the precinct building both say police.
The movie begins with Riley Vance (Shenae Grimes-Beech) struggling to find employment when she gets a tip on a personal assistant job. When they call her name to be interviewed they call Riley V., and while in the interview she realizes that the interview was suppose to be for Riley Vanderdale but she was already committed and hired so she just goes with it. So Riley becomes the assistant to William Young (Steve Lund) who has inherited his father's massive company and is challenged to perform well to prove his worth. William is faced with possibly closing the company's flagship toy factory in Dover, New Hampshire. While in Dover several delightful characters are introduced such as Piper (Hannah Spear) who is resourceful, delightful and fills several roles for the town; Mayor Martin Keegan (Ron Lea) is cheerful, funny and provides William with wonderful advice; the sheriff, and several others contribute to the fun.
The chemistry between Riley and William feels real and you know they will be great together. This is a fun and romantic movie that shares to spirit of Christmas.
Victor J
The chemistry between Riley and William feels real and you know they will be great together. This is a fun and romantic movie that shares to spirit of Christmas.
Victor J
Although the title of the film was one of those cute but very corny titles and the premise did sound like very familiar ground, part of me was still intrigued into seeing 'Christmas Incorporated'. Due to liking enough of Hallmark's Christmas efforts, which in terms of overall quality when it comes to their overall output is a very mixed bag. Also have seen Steve Lund in other things and he strikes me as not being bad at all as an actor and tending to be one of the better aspects of what he stars or features in.
'Christmas Incorporated' is not one of the best Hallmark Christmas, with there being too many big flaws. It is also not one of the worst, as it does have some quite big good things too. Ranking it, 'Christmas Incorporated' is somewhere around low middle and one of those films that is like what the title and plot synopsis indicate. Not terrible by any stretch, better than what has been indicated by some here despite sharing some of their criticisms, but nothing special really at all.
It looks quite good, very nicely photographed with not too drab a look. There are some sweet, mildly amusing and light-hearted moments here and there, as well as some nice parts in the music.
Lund is a likeable leading man, the character does not sound pleasant at all on paper at first but the character is actually easier to endear than the main character which is saying a lot. The other cast standout is Hannah Spear, a delight in a relatably amusing and resourceful sort of role. Jane Moffat was also quite good.
Was a bit mixed though on Shenae Grimes-Beech, who gets better as the film progresses and has more charm and subtlety. But to begin with her over-eagerness felt very over-played and it was a bit annoying, actually found Riley a character that took time to warm to. She could have had more chemistry with Lund, which wasn't non-existent but could have done with more spark. The locations can be limited and quite cheap, was expecting the toy factory to have more wonder. The music has moments but like too many Hallmark festive films it can be too over-scored and intrusive.
The script can be very awkward and cheesy, with its fair share of mush, and the direction is workmanlike but lacks urgency so the film can feel dull. The premise was a familiar-ground one, given very by-the-numbers and formulaic (to the extent that everything is telegraphed very obviously too early) execution. It could have done with a lot more charm, heart and the Christmas spirit is missing. The supporting turns are variable, good with Spear and Moffat but forgettable at best with the others, while the characters are the kind that don't grate as such generally but don't have enough distinction.
Concluding, okay but not much more than that. 4/10
'Christmas Incorporated' is not one of the best Hallmark Christmas, with there being too many big flaws. It is also not one of the worst, as it does have some quite big good things too. Ranking it, 'Christmas Incorporated' is somewhere around low middle and one of those films that is like what the title and plot synopsis indicate. Not terrible by any stretch, better than what has been indicated by some here despite sharing some of their criticisms, but nothing special really at all.
It looks quite good, very nicely photographed with not too drab a look. There are some sweet, mildly amusing and light-hearted moments here and there, as well as some nice parts in the music.
Lund is a likeable leading man, the character does not sound pleasant at all on paper at first but the character is actually easier to endear than the main character which is saying a lot. The other cast standout is Hannah Spear, a delight in a relatably amusing and resourceful sort of role. Jane Moffat was also quite good.
Was a bit mixed though on Shenae Grimes-Beech, who gets better as the film progresses and has more charm and subtlety. But to begin with her over-eagerness felt very over-played and it was a bit annoying, actually found Riley a character that took time to warm to. She could have had more chemistry with Lund, which wasn't non-existent but could have done with more spark. The locations can be limited and quite cheap, was expecting the toy factory to have more wonder. The music has moments but like too many Hallmark festive films it can be too over-scored and intrusive.
The script can be very awkward and cheesy, with its fair share of mush, and the direction is workmanlike but lacks urgency so the film can feel dull. The premise was a familiar-ground one, given very by-the-numbers and formulaic (to the extent that everything is telegraphed very obviously too early) execution. It could have done with a lot more charm, heart and the Christmas spirit is missing. The supporting turns are variable, good with Spear and Moffat but forgettable at best with the others, while the characters are the kind that don't grate as such generally but don't have enough distinction.
Concluding, okay but not much more than that. 4/10
Film historians of the future will no doubt teach seminars on the impact of the Canadian film factory (heavily taxpayer subsidized) on the content circulating through north America from approximately 1985 onwards.
Hollywood bluebloods hate the Canuck film machine because it takes food off the table. But, based on a lower dollar, the Canadians have found multiple "niches" where year after year they can slip almost-generic content into the maw, each one virtually into profit the moment the film leaves the camera because of the lower costs.
Some 90% of the movies that flood the airways around X-mas, in particular, are of this origin and most Americans don't have a clue.
This film is unusual for two reasons. Behind the camera is David Perlmutter who has been a Canuck film producer since the 80s and is by no definition a Johnny Come Lately.
And in front of the camera we have Shenae Grimes-Beech, an actress possessed of enough charisma for two leading ladies. She carries this film on her back and in the many areas where the script fails, or the casting of the extras (all too-familiar Canadian faces) fails, or the set design fails (the "toy factory" looks like an empty warehouse with a cheap sign installed at very the last minute) she simply cracks a smile and the audience decides to stick with the film for a few moments longer.
Finally and for the benefit of newbies to these sorts of films, a "6" rating is veritably an Oscar nod for such a film. I have seen worse.
Hollywood bluebloods hate the Canuck film machine because it takes food off the table. But, based on a lower dollar, the Canadians have found multiple "niches" where year after year they can slip almost-generic content into the maw, each one virtually into profit the moment the film leaves the camera because of the lower costs.
Some 90% of the movies that flood the airways around X-mas, in particular, are of this origin and most Americans don't have a clue.
This film is unusual for two reasons. Behind the camera is David Perlmutter who has been a Canuck film producer since the 80s and is by no definition a Johnny Come Lately.
And in front of the camera we have Shenae Grimes-Beech, an actress possessed of enough charisma for two leading ladies. She carries this film on her back and in the many areas where the script fails, or the casting of the extras (all too-familiar Canadian faces) fails, or the set design fails (the "toy factory" looks like an empty warehouse with a cheap sign installed at very the last minute) she simply cracks a smile and the audience decides to stick with the film for a few moments longer.
Finally and for the benefit of newbies to these sorts of films, a "6" rating is veritably an Oscar nod for such a film. I have seen worse.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesWilliam Young gets stopped by a member of law enforcement. When Mr. Young calls him "officer", the reply is, "That's 'Sheriff'", yet the patrol car is boldly emblazoned "Dover Police".
- Erros de gravaçãoThe main characters have exactly the same conversation word for word twice (about the female lead's home town and her not having anyone past thanksgiving) in two different locations within 5 minutes of each other.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Central de atendimento oficial
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Fabricando ilusiones
- Locações de filme
- St. George, Ontário, Canadá(Dover, New Hampshire)
- Empresa de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente
Principal brecha
By what name was Natal S.A. (2015) officially released in Canada in English?
Responda