Third Eye Spies

This is a great story that needs to be told about the use of remote viewing by U.S. (and Soviet) intelligence agencies both from a pure research angle and eventually to more practical applications. While the filmmaking itself may not meet the expectations of modern film viewers, the story and the people involved are remarkable. I found myself riveted to it from start to finish.

Highly recommended for people with a strong interest in ESP and paranormal abilities, but maybe it's not a great film for people with a casual interest who might prefer a riveting actual film. The pacing is slow, and the central character meets few of the criteria for a leading man in a mainstream movie. But even more critical viewers may appreciate the arc of the story and the revelations about paranormal research over a period of decades. The laughable but somehow predictable end of this era is the icing on the cake.

People laugh about this and that only shows how little do they know themselves.

Anyone that has a contact with meditation and energy, will eventually end up discovering our own potential and the kind of threat it is if it's used in the wrong way.

However, this is not to be scared at all, this is a super natural hability hidden inside all of us, that we need to embrace and hopefully, re-discover.

This documentary could be surprising for many, but I'm glad it's out there because it's worth the try, I hope it wakes u up and shakes your world and how u see it if u still believe we're just meat, water and bones.

Know that we're one.

I actually took a Remote Viewing course that Skip Atwater was involved in. Really nice guy and effective teacher.

Had a few RV instances that were way beyond co-incidence. Shocked me quite honestly, so I know this is a legit phenomenon.

Wish the presentation was a bit better as it is such an interesting story.

For content of this documentary I would give a 10. Very familiar with the history, people and solid research in the field. All now declassified by the government. So kudos for getting the story out.

Unfortunately the editing of this is very confusing even for some one who knows the history. It's jumpy and very hard to follow the threads in the story because of constantly changing the scenes while trying to tell the story. A 5 for editing.

So close to an 7-8 overall. Too bad because the story and people are amazing

So an old guy is really ticked off because he wasn't allowed to use the Wikipedia article about him as a vanity bio page. He's mad because the Wikipedia article focuses on his work in pseudoscience, rather than his work on lasers. In a documentary about pseudoscience. And he's known for being a figure in the world of pseudoscience, not lasers.

And he lies about why they removed the info he kept adding.

For one, there are no "Wikipedia Masters," lol. Wikipedia editors just need to follow the rules of Wikipedia.

Second, subjects of an article are not allowed to edit it.

Third, why in the world did they put this in the documentary? How embarrassing. It just makes him and the documentary creators look clueless and out-of-touch.

I guess the camera work is...fine. Production value is fine. Meh.