Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaA World War One soldier accidentally time travels to present day Los Angeles and struggles to find a way back to his wife in 1918.A World War One soldier accidentally time travels to present day Los Angeles and struggles to find a way back to his wife in 1918.A World War One soldier accidentally time travels to present day Los Angeles and struggles to find a way back to his wife in 1918.
Avaliações em destaque
This is one of those shaky camera movies. With stilted dialog and not well-thought-out plots. You cannot have "time travel" without a whole (wormhole). But this is too many holes in the plot and the execution.
Someone might think "how can he adapt to technology so quickly?" This is explained in the movie. A cell phone is just a combination of phone and radio which both exist in 1918, etc.
Others may ask why not ask questions of that time to help verify his story? Try asking a teenager where Belize is.
Alistair (Guy Birtwhistle) gets blown out of 1918 France to today (2016) in the U. S. He immediately becomes a homeless bum and counts the days accurately for filmmakers that cannot hold the camera still.
All he wants to do is worm his way home. All the filmmakers want to mess with his life and film it. Can the two wants coincide?
Can you stand to watch this slow-moving movie to the end to see if there is any twist or turn? I doubt it.
Someone might think "how can he adapt to technology so quickly?" This is explained in the movie. A cell phone is just a combination of phone and radio which both exist in 1918, etc.
Others may ask why not ask questions of that time to help verify his story? Try asking a teenager where Belize is.
Alistair (Guy Birtwhistle) gets blown out of 1918 France to today (2016) in the U. S. He immediately becomes a homeless bum and counts the days accurately for filmmakers that cannot hold the camera still.
All he wants to do is worm his way home. All the filmmakers want to mess with his life and film it. Can the two wants coincide?
Can you stand to watch this slow-moving movie to the end to see if there is any twist or turn? I doubt it.
I was looking for time travel movies and this isn't one really.
Its easily watchable with natural acting and virtually no special effects.
There is a feel good factor throughout but you always fear the worst outcome .
I appreciate its not for everyone , but it cost peanuts to make so for me it kept me watching so I rate it highly
I appreciate its not for everyone , but it cost peanuts to make so for me it kept me watching so I rate it highly
I found this film oddly comforting. I don't know why or how, but I felt peaceful at the end. The story is completely farcical, or is it? If you have even a basic understanding of relativity and are okay watching low budget 1970's cheesy science fiction...you'll be entertained.
If you were in a Hollywood movie and you stumbled across a man that said that he'd time-travelled from 1918, I bet you'd help him and there would be amazing special effects. If the same scenario happened to you in real life, I wonder if you'd be more likely to run away and perhaps report him to local services of some sort?
I found this film quite extraordinary, but something about it intrigued me enough to watch it all the way through.
I initially felt that it was obviously very low budget (which it clearly is). Then I felt that the acting was nothing special, until it struck me that the acting was incredibly natural. It all just seemed very real to me which makes a change because in these types of found footage/hand-cam movies I'm used to clichés. There were no corny lines that I noticed.
The reason that I've put in my subject title that you have to use your imagination is because there are parts in the film where I thought "that doesn't explain something", or "you just wouldn't do that, would you?". That is where I had to make allowances. It's confusing in parts. I felt emphasis with the female lead who wasn't sure if she believed the soldier, but she wanted to. - And then her male partner/husband who was very cynical. (That also confused me because at one point, unless I misunderstood, she's gay?).
The script was written beautifully and with realism, the lead actor (and writer) I felt was very handsome. It even picked up on the fact that because of what had happened to him and the fact that he'd been in his uniform for a while, that his body might smell a bit. Little touches to the movie like that are often not noticed or generally not even mentioned.
I suspect that most people won't like this movie. Personally I thought it was very good. Not superb, but very good. 8/10 from me and I'm going to see what else I can find from at least the 2 lead actors in this movie. Particularly the male.
I found this film quite extraordinary, but something about it intrigued me enough to watch it all the way through.
I initially felt that it was obviously very low budget (which it clearly is). Then I felt that the acting was nothing special, until it struck me that the acting was incredibly natural. It all just seemed very real to me which makes a change because in these types of found footage/hand-cam movies I'm used to clichés. There were no corny lines that I noticed.
The reason that I've put in my subject title that you have to use your imagination is because there are parts in the film where I thought "that doesn't explain something", or "you just wouldn't do that, would you?". That is where I had to make allowances. It's confusing in parts. I felt emphasis with the female lead who wasn't sure if she believed the soldier, but she wanted to. - And then her male partner/husband who was very cynical. (That also confused me because at one point, unless I misunderstood, she's gay?).
The script was written beautifully and with realism, the lead actor (and writer) I felt was very handsome. It even picked up on the fact that because of what had happened to him and the fact that he'd been in his uniform for a while, that his body might smell a bit. Little touches to the movie like that are often not noticed or generally not even mentioned.
I suspect that most people won't like this movie. Personally I thought it was very good. Not superb, but very good. 8/10 from me and I'm going to see what else I can find from at least the 2 lead actors in this movie. Particularly the male.
This movie is always viewed from the angle of the camera man... but, it's not hokey and jerky like found footages are known to be. I had never heard of this movie before... and, with me loving the odd, thought impossible, unexplainable topics, I jumped in! I was not disappointed!! It doesn't move along fast, and maybe there's a couple of "say whut?!!" moments, but I found the movie very entertaining and pretty satisfying!! I loved the story, the acting and the emotions it put out there... both between the characters and for myself. Movies don't have to be Oscar winners to have what it takes to entertain and have merit! Just sayin'.....
Você sabia?
- Erros de gravaçãoOne of the simplest and easiest ways to determine if Alistair was telling the truth, which the main characters never think to do, would have been to ask him about local government and politics during his time. Such as who was the British Prime Minister, who represented Alistair's town in parliament, and who was the name of the local parish priest. It is doubtful a mentally ill man from the present would have known these things, and this would have confirmed Alistair's knowledge of the past to a much higher degree.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- País de origem
- Idioma
- Também conhecido como
- Alistair 1918
- Empresa de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 26 min(86 min)
- Cor
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente