AVALIAÇÃO DA IMDb
3,0/10
1,6 mil
SUA AVALIAÇÃO
Precisando de dinheiro, uma estudante aceita trabalhar no horário noturno em um museu. Ela passa, então, a suspeitar que uma das peças em exibição, um boneco aterrorizante chamado Robert, es... Ler tudoPrecisando de dinheiro, uma estudante aceita trabalhar no horário noturno em um museu. Ela passa, então, a suspeitar que uma das peças em exibição, um boneco aterrorizante chamado Robert, está viva, espalhando o horror durante a madrugada.Precisando de dinheiro, uma estudante aceita trabalhar no horário noturno em um museu. Ela passa, então, a suspeitar que uma das peças em exibição, um boneco aterrorizante chamado Robert, está viva, espalhando o horror durante a madrugada.
- Direção
- Roteirista
- Artistas
Suzanne Dallaway
- Jenny Otto
- (as Suzie Frances Garton)
Avaliações em destaque
I must start out with a warning of sorts. Don't lured in by this movie, which obviously just cashes in on the success of "Annabelle".
The storyline in this movie was pointless and really uneventful.
The characters were essentially one-dimensional cardboard cut outs that you don't care about or invest any energy in.
The doll itself looked like something that was made by someone in primary school. And it was painstakingly clear that all the scenes with the doll was just some person holding it and moving its arms or legs. it was all so very, very low key.
This low budget horror movie is not worth the time or effort. I actually sat through it to the end but drifted off two or three times along the way. And I actually found myself with my attention on the phone a lot throughout the course of the snoozefest that is "The Curse of Robert the Doll".
The storyline in this movie was pointless and really uneventful.
The characters were essentially one-dimensional cardboard cut outs that you don't care about or invest any energy in.
The doll itself looked like something that was made by someone in primary school. And it was painstakingly clear that all the scenes with the doll was just some person holding it and moving its arms or legs. it was all so very, very low key.
This low budget horror movie is not worth the time or effort. I actually sat through it to the end but drifted off two or three times along the way. And I actually found myself with my attention on the phone a lot throughout the course of the snoozefest that is "The Curse of Robert the Doll".
Just not good. Not very original and I think even a documentary about Robert The Doll is scarier. Bad effects among other things just come off as negative. Since I know quite a bit about the real Robert The Doll I didn't find it very impressive.
A young woman takes a job on the night shift in a small curio museum. When her coworkers' bodies begin piling up, the prime suspect is one of the displays, a hideous doll which is purported to be possessed.
Very loosely based on a real story (relocated from early 20th century Florida to contemporary Britain), the original "Robert" was a tedious movie, paced at the speed of evolution, with characters who behaved idiotically and cheaper effects than the worst of the Charles Band killer-doll flicks. This time around, the pace is a little better (though it still takes far too long to get going), the characters are slightly more likable (a returning cast member steps up their game and the rest of the performances are decent) and the effects are... well, about the same. Frankly, it's a case of been there, done that, seen it - and much better. But sadly, I've also seen much worse. The biggest problem with these films is that suspense isn't handled well, it's draaaaagged out to the point of boredom and the payoff generally sucks.
It's sort of a shame that this trilogy (a third film is slated to be released next year) has been so painfully mediocre, cuz it's kind of disrespectful to the real Robert, who deserves a more faithful telling of his bizarre tale. Still, this sequel's a few rungs above the original, so perhaps the third film might actually be good.
Very loosely based on a real story (relocated from early 20th century Florida to contemporary Britain), the original "Robert" was a tedious movie, paced at the speed of evolution, with characters who behaved idiotically and cheaper effects than the worst of the Charles Band killer-doll flicks. This time around, the pace is a little better (though it still takes far too long to get going), the characters are slightly more likable (a returning cast member steps up their game and the rest of the performances are decent) and the effects are... well, about the same. Frankly, it's a case of been there, done that, seen it - and much better. But sadly, I've also seen much worse. The biggest problem with these films is that suspense isn't handled well, it's draaaaagged out to the point of boredom and the payoff generally sucks.
It's sort of a shame that this trilogy (a third film is slated to be released next year) has been so painfully mediocre, cuz it's kind of disrespectful to the real Robert, who deserves a more faithful telling of his bizarre tale. Still, this sequel's a few rungs above the original, so perhaps the third film might actually be good.
Robert The Doll (2015) was a weak messy British horror so I was hugely surprised to see it spawn a sequel. Wait did I say sequel? I meant sequels, because at time of writing there are no less than four Robert movies.
Now for those of you unfamiliar Robert is based upon a real doll, a doll that inspired the existence of Childs Plays own Chucky. But make no mistake these movies are not on the same level, not even remotely.
What I find odd is that they don't use the real Roberts appearance because that is considerably scarier. Seriously, it's like a cabbage patch doll imitating leather face!
Well Robert The Doll is fresh off his last killing spree and is now an exhibit in a museum. It's not l.ong until he returns to his old ways and it comes down to the buildings security guards and newly recruited cleaner to save the day.
To it's credit it does remain consistent and even includes a cast member from the original. Sadly this doesn't make up for everything else being beyond awful.
The Good:
Meh
The Bad:
Pretty much everything
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
I still struggle to find a doll even remotely feasible
I need alcohol if I'm going to weather the next two films
Now for those of you unfamiliar Robert is based upon a real doll, a doll that inspired the existence of Childs Plays own Chucky. But make no mistake these movies are not on the same level, not even remotely.
What I find odd is that they don't use the real Roberts appearance because that is considerably scarier. Seriously, it's like a cabbage patch doll imitating leather face!
Well Robert The Doll is fresh off his last killing spree and is now an exhibit in a museum. It's not l.ong until he returns to his old ways and it comes down to the buildings security guards and newly recruited cleaner to save the day.
To it's credit it does remain consistent and even includes a cast member from the original. Sadly this doesn't make up for everything else being beyond awful.
The Good:
Meh
The Bad:
Pretty much everything
Things I Learnt From This Movie:
I still struggle to find a doll even remotely feasible
I need alcohol if I'm going to weather the next two films
Right, let's be honest, it's no Annabelle, but in this second outing, Robert is now housed in a museum, and of course causes mayhem when the new cleaner arrives.
I'm not sure why expectations from some were seemingly quite high, surely they must have seen the first?
It's low budget, it's silly, but it's not without some level of charm, I liked the accompanying music, it was definitely a little creepy, and atmospheric.
The acting, was decent I thought, some of it was good, some was average.
Robert, if only he could have been a little more animated, he was perhaps a little static, his footsteps were rather cute I thought.
I loved the atmosphere of the opening and closing scenes, and that security guard was very cute.
It wasn't bad, 5/10.
I'm not sure why expectations from some were seemingly quite high, surely they must have seen the first?
It's low budget, it's silly, but it's not without some level of charm, I liked the accompanying music, it was definitely a little creepy, and atmospheric.
The acting, was decent I thought, some of it was good, some was average.
Robert, if only he could have been a little more animated, he was perhaps a little static, his footsteps were rather cute I thought.
I loved the atmosphere of the opening and closing scenes, and that security guard was very cute.
It wasn't bad, 5/10.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesIn the real life case Robert Eugene Otto (Gene) was first given Robert the Doll in 1906, when he was just six years old, by an angry Bahamian servant with an interest in black magic and voodoo. It was rumored that the gift was the servant's revenge for being mistreated by the Otto family. Eugene Otto kept Robert by his side until his death in 1974. It is rumored that Otto's wife, Anne, was driven insane by her husband's lifelong devotion to the doll.
- ConexõesFollowed by The Toymaker (2017)
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is The Curse of Robert the Doll?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 19.096
- Tempo de duração
- 1 h 19 min(79 min)
- Cor
- Proporção
- 2.22:1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente