Adicionar um enredo no seu idiomaA photographer unwittingly puts his life at risk by taking a former spy's picture.A photographer unwittingly puts his life at risk by taking a former spy's picture.A photographer unwittingly puts his life at risk by taking a former spy's picture.
Avaliações em destaque
Have to write to defend this... it's a perfectly decent film.
Katia Winter (Natalie) is good, captivating even, and everyone else is fine where, except for the photographer, they perform calm, minimalist characters. It fits with the mood of the film, some nice contemplative scenes, and dialog that, while others have said is weak, is also fine. Bits of mundane, predictable conversation isn't so far from real life I suspect, and I think it adds to the film, to keep it 'small'.
Not sure I know what cinematography really is, nor directing for that matter, but it seems relatively well put together.
I would agree that the weakness is the story logic, It almost worked that there was no time spent showing how the pursuers were tracking our leads, but not quite. Even a scene or two of them just asking a shop employee or two would have been enough (there was a nice moment where the male pursuer chats to a little boy tho). But ultimately, never saying how Natalie found our photographer or why it would matter so much to our pursuers kind of gnawed at me.
Katia Winter (Natalie) is good, captivating even, and everyone else is fine where, except for the photographer, they perform calm, minimalist characters. It fits with the mood of the film, some nice contemplative scenes, and dialog that, while others have said is weak, is also fine. Bits of mundane, predictable conversation isn't so far from real life I suspect, and I think it adds to the film, to keep it 'small'.
Not sure I know what cinematography really is, nor directing for that matter, but it seems relatively well put together.
I would agree that the weakness is the story logic, It almost worked that there was no time spent showing how the pursuers were tracking our leads, but not quite. Even a scene or two of them just asking a shop employee or two would have been enough (there was a nice moment where the male pursuer chats to a little boy tho). But ultimately, never saying how Natalie found our photographer or why it would matter so much to our pursuers kind of gnawed at me.
'Negative' is a dialogue film about trust and courage presenting opposite characters on the run from a cartel. There are several well- acted scenes, and others that seem like alternative shots better left out. While some plot elements seem contrived, the direction and choreography work in the movie's favor to drive a sequence of captivating themes by way of conversation that trample the sleaziness and pretentiousness of lesser films, all with the backdrop of a majestic desert that connects Los Angeles and Arizona.
A negative rating for Negative.
I'm not sure what accomplished director/producer/cinematographer Joshua Caldwell was thinking taking on this project.
This film has got to be the epitome of terrible writing and should be a classroom example of 'what not to do' when writing a screenplay. Why would Joshua take on (clearly) amateur writer Adam Gaines script is beyond me. Even his good directing and excellent cinematography could not save this disaster.
Aside from the super obvious plot holes and very poor story overall, the dragged-out unnecessary dialogue made this film unbearable and extremely boring. The way too long 1h 39min film length felt like 4 hours and I found myself saying "get on with it already, who cares!" when the two leads would just ramble on about nothing relevant. This movie may have been interesting if it was a 30 min short film (which oddly enough is the only minimal writing experience Adam Gaines has).
The acting was decent and Katia Winter was very easy on the eyes to look at, but her chemistry with Simon Quarterman was very unconvincing. Maybe it was the boring dialogue they had that made their chemistry absent.
Even the maybe total of 10 minutes of action scenes were overly dragged out. The rest of the film was primarily useless garbage dialogue with absolutely no point to the story - start to finish.
Don't waste your time with this one. See the trailer, and that's all the good and interesting parts you'll need to see.
This gets a 3/10 strictly for the directing and cinematography.
I'm not sure what accomplished director/producer/cinematographer Joshua Caldwell was thinking taking on this project.
This film has got to be the epitome of terrible writing and should be a classroom example of 'what not to do' when writing a screenplay. Why would Joshua take on (clearly) amateur writer Adam Gaines script is beyond me. Even his good directing and excellent cinematography could not save this disaster.
Aside from the super obvious plot holes and very poor story overall, the dragged-out unnecessary dialogue made this film unbearable and extremely boring. The way too long 1h 39min film length felt like 4 hours and I found myself saying "get on with it already, who cares!" when the two leads would just ramble on about nothing relevant. This movie may have been interesting if it was a 30 min short film (which oddly enough is the only minimal writing experience Adam Gaines has).
The acting was decent and Katia Winter was very easy on the eyes to look at, but her chemistry with Simon Quarterman was very unconvincing. Maybe it was the boring dialogue they had that made their chemistry absent.
Even the maybe total of 10 minutes of action scenes were overly dragged out. The rest of the film was primarily useless garbage dialogue with absolutely no point to the story - start to finish.
Don't waste your time with this one. See the trailer, and that's all the good and interesting parts you'll need to see.
This gets a 3/10 strictly for the directing and cinematography.
This was interesting, where it was almost a how-to or how-not-to "spy".
Who and what to trust (no one!) and why.
There were no real surprises, as I watch a lot of these type of movies, but I like watching women kick butt! :) What was the most disappointing in this video, is how BAD the sound was - most especially on the female lead.
As she's having conversations in the same frame with other actors, THEY can be heard all right, but her sound is SO LOW!
Such a poor choice, as she's doing MOST of the talking.
I'd give the video a lower score JUST on this, but I don't want to rob the actors of their kudos for their efforts.
The acting was pretty good, over all.
Who and what to trust (no one!) and why.
There were no real surprises, as I watch a lot of these type of movies, but I like watching women kick butt! :) What was the most disappointing in this video, is how BAD the sound was - most especially on the female lead.
As she's having conversations in the same frame with other actors, THEY can be heard all right, but her sound is SO LOW!
Such a poor choice, as she's doing MOST of the talking.
I'd give the video a lower score JUST on this, but I don't want to rob the actors of their kudos for their efforts.
The acting was pretty good, over all.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesWhen Katia asks Sebastian about the dog died she DIF in swedish. "Hur dog hunden".
- Erros de gravaçãoIn many of the driving scenes where Natalie is wearing sunglasses, the camera rig on the front of the car can be seen reflected in them.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Negative?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 100.000 (estimativa)
- Tempo de duração1 hora 39 minutos
- Cor
- Proporção
- 2.35 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente