Avaliações de usuários

Whilst obviously a low budget project I enjoyed this film tremendously. This story of a simple, latter day hero with honesty and courage shines a blazing light on the charlatans, liars and impostors who parade as our current leaders. The simplicity of the production complements the unadorned magnificence of T E Lawrence and this story. I left the glorious world premiere thrilled that integrity still has a value in this tarnished world.

The worst film I can remember seeing. Memorable only for the screenwriter, actors, sound recording, cinematographer, editor and director duelling it out for who could deliver the worst performance.

That said I would recommend it if only for comedy value. Films as terribly made as this don't come along often. Enjoy.

I applaud the director for giving it a go but the film was very poor and terribly shot. The acting, with a couple of exceptions, was a amateurish and the shots were over egged and tedious. A couple of beacons in the mist were the inquest scene (although terribly framed) I totally believed the actor presiding over the scene, I've seen him in lots and he's very believable, and the Cameo from Michael Maloney was enjoyable.. the rest were over acting I'm afraid.

This is a story of a great man, who traveled so far and achieved so much. He had secrets, of which many were envious. But was his death really an accident....

Having watched it twice (with growing dismay) I have to say this film will probably be used by film schools to demonstrate how NOT to make a movie. The acting is, with few exceptions, terrible. Barber-Duffy as Lawrence puts in a wooden and unconvincing performance which is amply demonstrated by his first scene.

May of the scenes are framed so badly they highlight both the inadequacy of both sets and direction. (See for example the scenes where the Head of Intelligence briefs his agents, and the hospital scene later in the film).

Access to Clouds Hill was infamously limited: but why does the Director use the exact same bit of film (Lawrence arriving on his Brough to find the cottage door open), multiple times? It's just so obvious.

The blue-screen scenes which are meant to represent Arabia are simply atrocious. It would have been better not to use them at all.

I find it hard to believe the film has gathered so many awards.

On the positive side, (yes there is one) the Dorset countryside is beautiful and does evoke the landscape around Clouds Hill.

Really enjoyed watching the film at long last, i found it charming full of great scenes and a wonderful cast. Looking at things in a different light and remembering a great man.

I know much of this story from Rodney Legg's 1988 book, so was interested to see it turned into a narrative. And I knew it would be low budget - but low budgets can often be a spur to imaginative and exciting solutions. Not in this case, sadly. Almost every department of moviemaking was shoddy. Direction was leaden. Editing was stodgy. Sound recording was mushy, and sound mixing woeful. Grading? Forget it. Continuity. Ditto. And, as for the acting... From the opening sequence, with a child actor who would have made a primary school nativity audience wince, to our hero, who was presumably trying to convey a tortured soul but only succeeded in looking mildly dyspeptic, even while squeezing out a tear. To be honest, I didn't get far enough into the movie to reach the actors we've heard of. After the second sequence of 'Arabs' running single file right to left I decided to either stay and laugh or go and do something more life-enhancing. I went. If you're interested in the story, track down the book. If you want to see a good movie, go elsewhere.

I have truly enjoyed watching this film.

Good acting Very beautiful scenery, interesting story.

Special detail that the director included himself and the reason why he got intrigued by this story into the film.

I really enjoyed the film, the plot, the way it felt close and intimate and the way it drew me in so I felt as if I was part of it.

Very well done for a director with a very limited budget thus limited technical means and possibilities. First class actors.

Don't expect a Hollywood film with a Hollywood budget, that would not be fair.

This film has been made with a passion and an interest ignited during the director's childhood and you can feel that as you watch it unfold. Something you can hardly say of million dollar films that are only made to be uninteresting cash cows.

I certainly recommend everyone to go and see Lawrence after Arabia. Very much worth the while and it gives much food for thought.

I think my heading sums it up best...

When they started with the opening scene I though it had to be part of the local adverts..... right?

Wrong.... Yes i went in knowing it was low budget & shot locally but even so I expected much better than this.

Everything about it was poor, opening music sounded like it was done on one of those toy xylophone's, sound quality abysmal, acting that would have seen those in a local production having non-speaking parts the following year, the direction... where to start.... I think you get the picture...

It really is one to avoid, i walked out after 30 minutes otherwise I would have been rolling in the aisles & watching it locally I suspect there were a few in the audience who were "extras" so I saved myself the shaming....

Looking through the reviews I suspect those giving high marks actually appeared in the film as I really didnt see anything worthy of more than a one.

It really was horrible & moreso as I admire & am fascinated by the TE Lawrence story.

Sadly, a wasted evening. The wooden acting was matched by the poor photography, editing, sound and continuity. We were treated to an overlong funeral procession, on repeat. Even the beautiful Dorset locations were wasted by the lack of focus and lighting. The bloated script was an overlong conspiracy theory taking us up to the present day. Lawrence was a brave - even heroic - man, if confused about his identity. A shame this film couldn't do him justice.

What a dreadful mess this film was. It took the most banal conspiracy theory about Lawrence's death and failed to offer any evidence in support of it. Didn't seem able to get anything right. Ok the bike had the right number plate and Clouds Hill seemed to get a look in. Given that what makes Lawrence especially interesting is what he did with the latter part of his life, this really was a wasted opportunity to add something. Now i have been told i need to write a longer review. Seems more helpful to keep it short and sweet. But that's not what this website seems to value. I suggest potential audience instead read the very helpful book published about Lawrence's death which highlights the weaknesses of an inadequately serviced bike and the good thing that came out of it; a recommendation at the inquest for riders to wear helmets which was followed up in the war for despatch riders.

I saw this film at the world premiere and truly enjoyed it. The director is passionate about his trade and that came across incredibly in his work. Covering one of the lesser spoken about periods of history this awakened my interest in T. E. Lawrence and I'm keen to learn more.

First things first, This was made on a non-existent budget for a feature, a first time director and a tiny crew. So I'll try not to be too harsh, but the director needs to know where he went wrong, so he can improve on it next time.

So there isn't a single aspect of this film that didn't have issues, some more glaring than others. By far the biggest issue is that technically is this the worst film I've ever seen. From Inaudible sound due to the lack of sound mixing and background noise, green screen issues such as jpegs being used as background and no effort to make these believable, visible artefacts from poor keying, horrendous editing (was there anyone keeping an eye on continuity??) along with all that, the camera work really felt like a lazy student film, shots being over and under exposed, lack of thought put into the shots, no colour grading and the footage just looked so dull, and finally I've never seen a film reuse so much footage before, you could turn it into a drinking game (which probably isn't a bad idea if you're going to watch this)

The acting wasn't the worst, but I can't see anyone getting any Oscars any time soon, and oh my god the pacing was mind-numbing this felt like a 4 hour movie. I hope the director reads and takes in all the feedback he will inevitably get and uses that as a jumping off point to improve his skills as a director.

Truly wonderful and well worth the wait.

Atmospheric and thought provoking insight into a mystery that still resinates after 85 years.

Wonderfully acted and not reliant on big budget special effects, it will leave you to draw your own conclusion

A masterclass in story telling.

Well deserving of the accolades already being credited.

A reasonable story. But an extremely amateur production. Poor lighting and sound. Bad continuity. Awful shot composure.

Synthesiser created music to a period drama ????

I've seen better acting in amateur dramatics. And far better production by college students.

I am very surprised by the negative reviews for this film, and feel strongly that they are very unfair. As an extremely low-budget movie, apparently shot with just one camera and a tiny crew of five, it is reminiscent of the films of old, before the big corporations dominated the film-going experience with their mega budgets and special effects. Of course it could never compete with the likes of those, and it isn't meant to. I was at the gala première in Poole on the 9th of October. There were no sound issues, and no issues regarding the quality of the film. Yes, the start is a bit slow, as it aims to explain the issues that could have led to Lawrence's possible assassination. But then it picks up the pace and completely draws you in. I loved the fact that there were no complicated shots, just a simple visual story telling, at the end of which one is left with questions about what did really happen. The music by the likes of Bruce Woolley ('Video Killed the Radio Star'), Chris Thompson ("Blinded by the Light, Manfred Mann's Earth Band), Rick Wakeman ("Yes") and Clifford White was great, and the use of well-known actors in cameo roles well-considered (Michael Maloney, Hugh Fraser, Nicole Ansari-Cox, and the voice of Brian Cox) I would challenge anyone to go it alone and personally fund a feature film, then go on to win multiple awards (31) at the various film festivals. Of course such a project could never compare to what audiences are used to these days. I for one thoroughly enjoyed the film, have spoken to lots of people who loved it too, and am looking forward to seeing it again with members of my family next week! Hats off to the director, cast and crew. A very well done!

Imagine an amateur dramatic society at its first meeting gaining access to film equipment & you have some idea of the quality of this film. Sound, photography & continuity were embarrassing in places & the glimpses of good acting brief. The story could have been so much more in depth & instead far too much time was spent on peripheral activity eg the funeral procession.

Having been looking forward to this showing for some time, with a keen interest in the life of T E Lawrence, I was sadly disappointed.

This film is totally absorbing and tells a story that must be heard. T. E Lawrence had an extraordinary life that ended untimely, steeped in controversy and corruption. Brilliantly depicted and a must see ! Highly recommend !

I had high expectations for this film but unfortunately I found it disappointing. The story itself was interesting and held my attention, but the sound, continuity and photography were all inadequate, not to mention the tedious, incessant and inappropriate music score. The acting, with a few exceptions, was weak, and to bill Brian Cox as the star in the opening credits showed some nerve - what a con! He never even appeared on screen, just providing brief narration. I sat through the whole film wondering how on earth it could have won any kinds of awards or indeed how it was even selected for various film festivals. Clearly this film was made on too small a budget, making it look like an over-stretched amateur production.

Dire amateur dramatics with no respect for its subject matter. Dwells on misinformed conspiracy theories best consigned to the trash. The genuine Lawrence story is far more interesting than this self-delusional dog's dinner. Avoid at all costs!

This is a true low budget film, that brings a story to life, without losing quality.

A directorial debut that deserves all the plaudits and awards it is winning around the world.

Brilliant cast all giving their best to the story line.

Filmed in original locations as much as possible.

Whether we know the truth or not is for you do judge.

Must also give a mention to the brilliant music. ( I must get the album)

This film is - in my view - essentially nothing but a 'home movie'. Utterly amateur in all respects. The director has a massive ego - and a dearth of creative talent. Nor does he possess the requisite technical skills to make a film on this scale.

There are numerous ghastly editing/continuity mistakes, and it was very apparent that the low budget did not extend to splashing out on any lighting!!! The inside scenes were all so dark that it was impossible to see what was going on.

A large number of the cast members were barely even 'talented' amateurs. Many of the performances are embarrassingly poor, matching the quality of the stilted screenplay.

Aside from the technical shortcomings, the director's story-telling technique is quite hopeless, leaving the audience guessing and struggling to follow the thread.

To add insult to injury, the title of the film is not even original - it has been stolen from a TV movie. I guess this might well provide grounds for a lawsuit for breach of copyright when and if this becomes 'public knowledge'.

We saw the movie at the premiere and loved it! For once an original story which is not a mediocre Marvel or sorry Star Wars or bland Bond. On limited resources an impressive period piece and debut for Mark JT Griffin. The film gained a standing ovation at the premiere where we watched it and its obvious the director's passion in the subject. Lawrence is shown as damaged hero by Tom Barber Duffy. Steve Rollins excellent as Tyrell and Mark Vernon Freestone great at Catchpole. The named actors Brian Cox, Nicole Ansari Cox, Hugh Fraser and Michael Maloney are used in single scenes. Nicole Ansari Cox stands out as Sarah Lawrence Lawrence's vicious and overbearing mother. Fraser shines as Allenby. Maloney superb as Brough. The film was shot on location around Dorset in locations Lawrence would have known such as his house and the cast and crew were mainly Dorset based. Production standards included a Brough Superior's (2), Gypsy Moth, Tiger Moth and an Arabian falcon are used to great effect. A strong debut and intense story.