13 avaliações
Liam Neeson and Pierce Brosnan must have lent their fame to this film because they love children and families. Beyond their notoriety, this movie's script has no real hook.
The pottery town of Pottersglen is about to be purchased to make way for a casino and golf course. Coincidence with the name Potter being used (as in "Its a Wonderful Life" with Mr. Potter as the antagonist?) Maybe so, but even top stars couldn't save this oft repeated "save the town from a greedy, villainous corporate executive" theme. Liam Neeson's narration and his easily recognizable gravely voice add any magic. Cute kids. Good acting. Bad script.
The pottery town of Pottersglen is about to be purchased to make way for a casino and golf course. Coincidence with the name Potter being used (as in "Its a Wonderful Life" with Mr. Potter as the antagonist?) Maybe so, but even top stars couldn't save this oft repeated "save the town from a greedy, villainous corporate executive" theme. Liam Neeson's narration and his easily recognizable gravely voice add any magic. Cute kids. Good acting. Bad script.
- famtherapy
- 31 de dez. de 2023
- Link permanente
- TxMike
- 24 de dez. de 2015
- Link permanente
A Christmas Star (2015) -
Noelle played by Erin Galway-Kendrick was the real star of this film. She was the only one, in a cast of supposedly good actors, that could actually deliver.
Robert James Collier was not the leading man the credits would have had me believe. He was also awful and his accent was all over the place. He was so false and the "Junior" thing with his son got really gross, really quickly.
And Pierce Brosnan was worse than he was in 'Mamma Mia!' (2008), but at least he didn't sing in this one.
I suppose that the only saving grace, apart from Erin, was Liam Neeson as the Narrator/Radio DJ, but I did have to wonder why he and Pierce would ever lend their names to a production like this. I was also very disappointed with Kylie Minogue and Dermot O'Leary for agreeing to be in it. Neither of their cameos were impressive or even that necessary.
The story itself, was very old fashioned, making the people of Ireland look backwards and out of touch and most of it was contrived, far fetched and forced. Not to mention that the whole factory take over thing had been done many times before and much better. It didn't even feel like a budget TV production, it just felt cheap.
It was really unclear what the random numbers that kept appearing in baubles were too, but it turned out it was the date.
They tried to end with a feel good moment, like that of 'Nativity!' (2009), but failed terribly, because it was just a bit confused and out of nowhere, all of a sudden. It didn't help that it was so bad that I wished that I hadn't bothered, so by the time it did get to the end, I was just desperately waiting for the credits to roll.
I've definitely turned off better than this.
Never to be watched again, I will never see that time again and I might actually sue the producers for compensation.
It was so bad!
1/10.
Noelle played by Erin Galway-Kendrick was the real star of this film. She was the only one, in a cast of supposedly good actors, that could actually deliver.
Robert James Collier was not the leading man the credits would have had me believe. He was also awful and his accent was all over the place. He was so false and the "Junior" thing with his son got really gross, really quickly.
And Pierce Brosnan was worse than he was in 'Mamma Mia!' (2008), but at least he didn't sing in this one.
I suppose that the only saving grace, apart from Erin, was Liam Neeson as the Narrator/Radio DJ, but I did have to wonder why he and Pierce would ever lend their names to a production like this. I was also very disappointed with Kylie Minogue and Dermot O'Leary for agreeing to be in it. Neither of their cameos were impressive or even that necessary.
The story itself, was very old fashioned, making the people of Ireland look backwards and out of touch and most of it was contrived, far fetched and forced. Not to mention that the whole factory take over thing had been done many times before and much better. It didn't even feel like a budget TV production, it just felt cheap.
It was really unclear what the random numbers that kept appearing in baubles were too, but it turned out it was the date.
They tried to end with a feel good moment, like that of 'Nativity!' (2009), but failed terribly, because it was just a bit confused and out of nowhere, all of a sudden. It didn't help that it was so bad that I wished that I hadn't bothered, so by the time it did get to the end, I was just desperately waiting for the credits to roll.
I've definitely turned off better than this.
Never to be watched again, I will never see that time again and I might actually sue the producers for compensation.
It was so bad!
1/10.
- adamjohns-42575
- 7 de dez. de 2022
- Link permanente
I believe that some of the people who worked on this film may have actually been trying, and good on them, but this is just lazy film making. It feels so fake and I watched it with my 4 year old cousin and she was bored the entire time. It gets it's points across in the most on the nose way possible, and it is honestly just awful. I don't want to slander anyone who makes movies and is trying to create art, but this movie should not have been made. Whoever had the most creative control should be ashamed.
- jakehohnke-94259
- 22 de dez. de 2018
- Link permanente
This is better than most of your Christmas films, which seem to bog themselves down in sentimentality and Christmas Spirit. This isn't a bad thing since that's what Christmas is about. However, when you get a film like this which is set in more realistic situations it's a nice break from the over cheeriness of the usual Chrimbo fodder.
What also make this a movie worth watching is the acting, which, by and far, is superb. They actors did a great job and must have taken more than a few notes from the cameo "Stars" in the film, as this was the intended purpose of the Television Festival for Young People.
That said, the film could've done with a bit better script and direction, there were times when my attention would stray, and the acting wasn't enough to keep me glued to the gogglebox.
I recommend this film to all and we need more Christmas films like this - and more films helping young actors to come forward.
What also make this a movie worth watching is the acting, which, by and far, is superb. They actors did a great job and must have taken more than a few notes from the cameo "Stars" in the film, as this was the intended purpose of the Television Festival for Young People.
That said, the film could've done with a bit better script and direction, there were times when my attention would stray, and the acting wasn't enough to keep me glued to the gogglebox.
I recommend this film to all and we need more Christmas films like this - and more films helping young actors to come forward.
- S1rr34l
- 26 de dez. de 2016
- Link permanente
Nice change of pace from the typical American Christmas Movie If you are familiar with the Bible then you will understand the phrase "And A Child Shall Lead Them" Born under the Christmas Star, Noelle believes she has the gift to perform miracles, so when conniving developer McKerrod threatens her peaceful life she and her friends determine to use this gift to thwart his plans and save their village. with the Bible you will understand when I say "And a Child Shall lead them" . This film is short and sweet. If you h ave a chance to view it to advantage of the opportunity. This is not a by the number "Hallmark" film. It has a nice "Disney Vibe" to it. There is even a few cameos in this film for the adults.
This film is very good. It is safe for the family to watch. Not a well known movie but it should be.
This film is very good. It is safe for the family to watch. Not a well known movie but it should be.
- Christmas-Reviewer
- 22 de ago. de 2016
- Link permanente
For a low-budget film that uses a lot of non-professionals, this is a really good film.
A pleasing plot. Very neat.
And the children are great actors.
I'm glad I watched it. I almost didn't - because of the low rating.
I had watched a big-budget children's film before it and that had the same rating. I gave it a 4. It was dire.
This film, however, is so much better.
No special effects, no professional child actors, but just so much better.
A pleasing plot. Very neat.
And the children are great actors.
I'm glad I watched it. I almost didn't - because of the low rating.
I had watched a big-budget children's film before it and that had the same rating. I gave it a 4. It was dire.
This film, however, is so much better.
No special effects, no professional child actors, but just so much better.
- nina_glyndwr
- 22 de dez. de 2016
- Link permanente
Creative story line twist amidst many Christmas shows that are all the same. Love wins!
- dawnp-38550
- 21 de dez. de 2018
- Link permanente
One of the villains in this film has "fake," "orange hair," and is wealthy. Although I watched this film from beginning to end, it was never clear to me which fictitious character had the fake, orange hair; it might have been Pierce Brosnan's character, or it might have been another character, named Pat McKerrod; in reality, I have no doubt who the fictitious villain represented. An insensitive, wealthy man with fake, orange hair, in 2017... Who could that be?
Although this film is obviously a Christmas movie, it was released in May of 2017. I don't know for sure, but I suspect that its production began in November of 2016. They couldn't finish it in time to release it before Christmas that year, but they could not wait until the following Christmas to release it.
Besides all of the cheap shots at a man who is arguably the best U. S. President since Abraham Lincoln, this film also included several cheap shots at Americans, which, as a native American who retired from the U. S. Army, I resent.
To his credit, Pierce Brosnan did a political "U-turn" by Christmas, 2019.
Although this film is obviously a Christmas movie, it was released in May of 2017. I don't know for sure, but I suspect that its production began in November of 2016. They couldn't finish it in time to release it before Christmas that year, but they could not wait until the following Christmas to release it.
Besides all of the cheap shots at a man who is arguably the best U. S. President since Abraham Lincoln, this film also included several cheap shots at Americans, which, as a native American who retired from the U. S. Army, I resent.
To his credit, Pierce Brosnan did a political "U-turn" by Christmas, 2019.
- WilliamMortensenVaughan
- 1 de jan. de 2024
- Link permanente
Based on some of other reviews, I first watched this in 2017 or so, and I'm glad I did. I've watched it every year since. I have no idea why the overall rating is poor. I just changed mine from 8 to 9 to help!
The acting was good - children and adults - the scenery's lovely, and the story is real. There is some ugliness spoken, but it all gets resolved. I heartily recommend this movie to anyone - please give it a try, and rate it! It may be best for ages 8-9 and up, since there's not much action or shiny things for small tots. If you like this, also see Journey to the Christmas Star (Norway).
The acting was good - children and adults - the scenery's lovely, and the story is real. There is some ugliness spoken, but it all gets resolved. I heartily recommend this movie to anyone - please give it a try, and rate it! It may be best for ages 8-9 and up, since there's not much action or shiny things for small tots. If you like this, also see Journey to the Christmas Star (Norway).
- zdarov
- 4 de dez. de 2016
- Link permanente
- henbradshaw
- 27 de nov. de 2018
- Link permanente
The story is alright, but the real gem is the surprise celebrity cameos. They are really big names and I wonder how the filmmakers managed to get the big names to appear in the film!
- Gordon-11
- 6 de jan. de 2021
- Link permanente