Animais Fantásticos: Os Crimes de Grindelwald
Título original: Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald
Após o bruxo das trevas Gerardo Grindelwald fugir da prisão, Newt Scamander é chamado pelo professor Alvo Dumbledore, que precisa que ele encontre uma maneira de impedir Grindelwald de segui... Ler tudoApós o bruxo das trevas Gerardo Grindelwald fugir da prisão, Newt Scamander é chamado pelo professor Alvo Dumbledore, que precisa que ele encontre uma maneira de impedir Grindelwald de seguir com um plano que ameaça dividir o mundo bruxo.Após o bruxo das trevas Gerardo Grindelwald fugir da prisão, Newt Scamander é chamado pelo professor Alvo Dumbledore, que precisa que ele encontre uma maneira de impedir Grindelwald de seguir com um plano que ameaça dividir o mundo bruxo.
- Indicado para 2 prêmios BAFTA
- 3 vitórias e 22 indicações no total
Cornell John
- Arnold Guzman
- (as Cornell S. John)
Resumo
Reviewers say 'Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald' offers a darker tone and expanded world-building with mixed reception. Praised for performances by Eddie Redmayne, Johnny Depp, and Jude Law, and impressive visual effects, the film struggles with a convoluted plot and numerous subplots. Critics argue it lacks focus, serving more as a setup for future installments. Disappointment arises from the limited role of fantastic beasts and an underdeveloped villain. Despite these issues, some appreciate its deeper exploration of the wizarding world and ties to the Harry Potter series.
Avaliações em destaque
Let me start off by saying that I am a big Harry Potter fan; I loved all 8 HP movies, and really liked the 1st installment of Newt's adventures as well.
This movie just didn't really do the trick for me. There was absolutely nothing to complain about visually; the movie was even more stunning than the first one, with even more beautifully designed 'Beasts'. And as many other people have mentioned, as a Harry Potter fan, you just can't hate this movie. Where Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them only contained a handful amount of references to the Harry Potter series, The Crimes of Grindelwald has tonnes. Enough to hype up any Harry Potter fan.
The problem this movie had for me was its plot, or rather, its almost nonexisting plot. This movie just seemed to serve as background information or something for the upcoming movies in this series (for which we'll undoubtedly have to wait another 2 years or more..), more of like a setup for things to come. It introduced many new characters and revealed certain things about already known characters. But yet, some of these things just felt unnatural, as if JK Rowling just kept writing more and more to squeeze into 1 movie. This basically leads to a movie where the biggest plot is to find Credence's 'true identity' - not really much of a plot at all. Some of the reveals about characters also seemed a bit strange, but that could be just me. All in all, all this dialogue about characters made it extra confusing to know what the movie was about, in addition to it lacking much of a plot to begin with.
This movie is definitely not a waste of money or anything, you could just buy a ticket for the stunning scenes and you'd be satisfied. It's just that this movie was quite a disappointment compared to many people's expectations I think, seeing as it basically is just a setup for the upcoming movies, which lacks a good plot.
The problem this movie had for me was its plot, or rather, its almost nonexisting plot. This movie just seemed to serve as background information or something for the upcoming movies in this series (for which we'll undoubtedly have to wait another 2 years or more..), more of like a setup for things to come. It introduced many new characters and revealed certain things about already known characters. But yet, some of these things just felt unnatural, as if JK Rowling just kept writing more and more to squeeze into 1 movie. This basically leads to a movie where the biggest plot is to find Credence's 'true identity' - not really much of a plot at all. Some of the reveals about characters also seemed a bit strange, but that could be just me. All in all, all this dialogue about characters made it extra confusing to know what the movie was about, in addition to it lacking much of a plot to begin with.
This movie is definitely not a waste of money or anything, you could just buy a ticket for the stunning scenes and you'd be satisfied. It's just that this movie was quite a disappointment compared to many people's expectations I think, seeing as it basically is just a setup for the upcoming movies, which lacks a good plot.
Almost impossible to keep up with what was going on! Just jumped from one thing to the next with no development, such a shame
Watching this gives you the sense that nobody really knew where to go after the first film ended... and it shows. Beautiful film with a great cast, but an ultimately pointless story that sort of flops around like a dead fish not quite aware yet that its dead. This film is disappointing and forgettable.
Although a lot was promised in the trailers, it falls short of those promises in the movie. Having said that, this movie is much like Deathly Hallows Part 1 in the sense that it does not stand out when watched in isolation but understandable in the greater scheme of things, as it sets up the future movies perfectly without offering much on its own.
The acting did a good job although the script doesn't allow for anyone to standout apart from Johnny Depp, who seems to make audiences aware of the fact that he's Johnny Depp every once in a while.
Overall, I feel this movie will be better received when its sequels come out, but mediocre as it stands.
Você sabia?
- CuriosidadesJohnny Depp signed on without reading a script. He wanted to be a part of the series because he is a self-proclaimed massive fan of the series.
- Erros de gravaçãoAccording to the books and Pottermore.com (site created by JK Rowling herself), Minerva McGonagall was born in 1935 and first started teaching at Hogwarts in 1956, when she was 21 years old. Even though the movie is set in 1927, eight years before her birth, she appears as a young professor in Hogwarts.
- Citações
Leta Lestrange: Oh, Newt. You never met a monster you couldn't love.
- Cenas durante ou pós-créditosThere are no mid- or end-credit scenes.
- Versões alternativasAn extended cut runs ~7 minutes longer.
Principais escolhas
Faça login para avaliar e ver a lista de recomendações personalizadas
- How long is Fantastic Beasts: The Crimes of Grindelwald?Fornecido pela Alexa
Detalhes
- Data de lançamento
- Países de origem
- Centrais de atendimento oficiais
- Idiomas
- Também conhecido como
- Animales fantásticos: Los crímenes de Grindelwald
- Locações de filme
- Lacock Abbey, Lacock, Chippenham, Wiltshire, Inglaterra, Reino Unido(Hogwarts School)
- Empresas de produção
- Consulte mais créditos da empresa na IMDbPro
Bilheteria
- Orçamento
- US$ 200.000.000 (estimativa)
- Faturamento bruto nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 159.555.901
- Fim de semana de estreia nos EUA e Canadá
- US$ 62.163.104
- 18 de nov. de 2018
- Faturamento bruto mundial
- US$ 655.755.901
- Tempo de duração2 horas 14 minutos
- Cor
- Mixagem de som
- Proporção
- 2.39 : 1
Contribua para esta página
Sugerir uma alteração ou adicionar conteúdo ausente