reviv-38304
Iscritto in data ott 2018
Ti diamo il benvenuto nel nuovo profilo
I nostri aggiornamenti sono ancora in fase di sviluppo. Sebbene la versione precedente del profilo non sia più accessibile, stiamo lavorando attivamente ai miglioramenti e alcune delle funzionalità mancanti torneranno presto! Non perderti il loro ritorno. Nel frattempo, l’analisi delle valutazioni è ancora disponibile sulle nostre app iOS e Android, che si trovano nella pagina del profilo. Per visualizzare la tua distribuzione delle valutazioni per anno e genere, fai riferimento alla nostra nuova Guida di aiuto.
Distintivi2
Per sapere come ottenere i badge, vai a pagina di aiuto per i badge.
Recensioni13
Valutazione di reviv-38304
It feels like the writers had developed a near perfect 1 season TV series. Like most here observe , season 2 fell off the cliff. The writers obviously didn't plan for season 2 , otherwise we wouldn't have what we have here. Suddenly the lead is a Lesbian and Mitch the most interesting character is 1 dimensional while the whole thing feels off.
You have destroyed one of the best season 1 TV shows I have ever seen. Many I can see feel the same, and why? There's so much to explore and nothing has happened in season 2 yet. Its so slow , so to spice it up some half writer says , hey lets make her gay. The twist? Come on, we deserve better than that. We want what we had in season one, not this desperate run out of ideas and the obvious frustration to fill the episode. The characters have all lost their soul. Its like watching another show.
You have destroyed one of the best season 1 TV shows I have ever seen. Many I can see feel the same, and why? There's so much to explore and nothing has happened in season 2 yet. Its so slow , so to spice it up some half writer says , hey lets make her gay. The twist? Come on, we deserve better than that. We want what we had in season one, not this desperate run out of ideas and the obvious frustration to fill the episode. The characters have all lost their soul. Its like watching another show.
Partner Track, a recent addition to the television landscape, falls far short of the mark set by exceptional legal dramas like Suits and other notable series. With its poorly written scripts, uninspired acting, and an abundance of clichés, Partner Track fails to establish any connection with its audience or offer likable and relatable characters. It ultimately disappoints as a subpar attempt at creating captivating television.
One of the most glaring issues with Partner Track is its writing. The dialogue feels forced and lacks nuance, resulting in stilted interactions between characters. The show seems to rely heavily on overused tropes and predictable plotlines, leaving little room for originality or surprise. The attempts at injecting drama often feel contrived and fail to evoke any genuine emotional response. This formulaic approach to storytelling becomes tiresome and contributes to the overall lackluster viewing experience.
The acting in Partner Track does little to elevate the weak material it is given. The performances come across as wooden and lacking in depth, with actors struggling to breathe life into their characters. There is a distinct absence of chemistry between the cast members, making it difficult to become invested in their relationships or root for their success. The absence of standout performances or memorable moments further hampers the show's ability to engage the viewer.
Moreover, the characters in Partner Track are poorly developed, leaving the audience with no one to truly connect with or care about. They often come across as one-dimensional archetypes, ticking off boxes on a checklist of legal drama clichés. The ambitious and driven protagonist, the ruthless senior partner, the quirky yet brilliant associate - these familiar character tropes have been explored countless times in similar shows, but Partner Track fails to bring anything fresh or compelling to the table.
In contrast to great legal dramas like Suits, where the characters are multidimensional and their growth is central to the plot, Partner Track seems content to keep its characters stagnant. There is little to no character development, and the audience is left wondering why they should invest their time and emotions in a story that fails to give its characters depth or complexity. Without well-drawn characters to anchor the narrative, the show becomes a tedious exercise in clichéd scenarios and predictable outcomes.
Another missed opportunity in Partner Track is its failure to explore the complexities of the legal profession. Unlike Suits, which delved into the intricacies of the law and the inner workings of a high-stakes law firm, Partner Track barely scratches the surface. The legal cases and challenges presented lack substance and fail to engage viewers on an intellectual level. The absence of compelling courtroom scenes and legal strategy further diminishes the series' appeal.
I really wanted to love it BUT.
One of the most glaring issues with Partner Track is its writing. The dialogue feels forced and lacks nuance, resulting in stilted interactions between characters. The show seems to rely heavily on overused tropes and predictable plotlines, leaving little room for originality or surprise. The attempts at injecting drama often feel contrived and fail to evoke any genuine emotional response. This formulaic approach to storytelling becomes tiresome and contributes to the overall lackluster viewing experience.
The acting in Partner Track does little to elevate the weak material it is given. The performances come across as wooden and lacking in depth, with actors struggling to breathe life into their characters. There is a distinct absence of chemistry between the cast members, making it difficult to become invested in their relationships or root for their success. The absence of standout performances or memorable moments further hampers the show's ability to engage the viewer.
Moreover, the characters in Partner Track are poorly developed, leaving the audience with no one to truly connect with or care about. They often come across as one-dimensional archetypes, ticking off boxes on a checklist of legal drama clichés. The ambitious and driven protagonist, the ruthless senior partner, the quirky yet brilliant associate - these familiar character tropes have been explored countless times in similar shows, but Partner Track fails to bring anything fresh or compelling to the table.
In contrast to great legal dramas like Suits, where the characters are multidimensional and their growth is central to the plot, Partner Track seems content to keep its characters stagnant. There is little to no character development, and the audience is left wondering why they should invest their time and emotions in a story that fails to give its characters depth or complexity. Without well-drawn characters to anchor the narrative, the show becomes a tedious exercise in clichéd scenarios and predictable outcomes.
Another missed opportunity in Partner Track is its failure to explore the complexities of the legal profession. Unlike Suits, which delved into the intricacies of the law and the inner workings of a high-stakes law firm, Partner Track barely scratches the surface. The legal cases and challenges presented lack substance and fail to engage viewers on an intellectual level. The absence of compelling courtroom scenes and legal strategy further diminishes the series' appeal.
I really wanted to love it BUT.
What a shocker. Worst in the series. Don't believe those who find beauty in this. There is no beauty, just a poorly written script by someone who obviously has been on too many mushrooms. Watched it all, read on line what its about and still confused. I want that time back, what a terrible excuse to put together. A lazy script indeed and nothing you say can save it. It made no sense, no context is in the script, we are totally lost through the whole journey, makes me feel I shouldn't have started the journey. Acting was ok, black and white had no meaning other than an attempt to create a feel that didn't work. Shocker.