russelldresearch
Iscritto in data nov 2017
Ti diamo il benvenuto nel nuovo profilo
I nostri aggiornamenti sono ancora in fase di sviluppo. Sebbene la versione precedente del profilo non sia più accessibile, stiamo lavorando attivamente ai miglioramenti e alcune delle funzionalità mancanti torneranno presto! Non perderti il loro ritorno. Nel frattempo, l’analisi delle valutazioni è ancora disponibile sulle nostre app iOS e Android, che si trovano nella pagina del profilo. Per visualizzare la tua distribuzione delle valutazioni per anno e genere, fai riferimento alla nostra nuova Guida di aiuto.
Distintivi2
Per sapere come ottenere i badge, vai a pagina di aiuto per i badge.
Valutazioni93
Valutazione di russelldresearch
Recensioni38
Valutazione di russelldresearch
Reading some of the reviews by people who highly rated this movie, I could conclude only that they came from people who grew up on Harry Potter books and movies, because this is a very poor ghost story and even weaker horror movie. I tried to suspend my overriding feeling that Harry Potter had grown up to become an estate agent (US: real estate guy), but it was hard to shake because Radcliffe is so typecast by being the main actor in the ELEVEN movies based on J K Rowling's novels about a school where kids learn magic.
The movie had good production values, but the haunted house is the best thing in it. I couldn't rate it higher than 5/10, because the script is predictable, the dialogue is cliched, and the acting is middling - except for Radcliffe, who drags it down to amateur level. His displays of emotion are often inappropriate for the scene - he doesn't look scared when he should but does look scared when he shouldn't. He often seems too stiff and flat to be credible, and he needs to learn to relax his arms so we aren't feeling his internal tension about performing. OK, he was just in his early twenties when he made this movie, but I haven't seen an improved performance in any of his latest movies either.
Radcliffe is not as annoying as a Hollywood nepo baby, but neither is he far away from such a status, either. I'm not sure if another actor could have rescued this mess of a movie, but Radcliffe clearly couldn't. Maybe if he makes it up with J K Rowling, he can appear in the twelth Harry Potter movie: Harry Potter and the Deathly Acting.
The movie had good production values, but the haunted house is the best thing in it. I couldn't rate it higher than 5/10, because the script is predictable, the dialogue is cliched, and the acting is middling - except for Radcliffe, who drags it down to amateur level. His displays of emotion are often inappropriate for the scene - he doesn't look scared when he should but does look scared when he shouldn't. He often seems too stiff and flat to be credible, and he needs to learn to relax his arms so we aren't feeling his internal tension about performing. OK, he was just in his early twenties when he made this movie, but I haven't seen an improved performance in any of his latest movies either.
Radcliffe is not as annoying as a Hollywood nepo baby, but neither is he far away from such a status, either. I'm not sure if another actor could have rescued this mess of a movie, but Radcliffe clearly couldn't. Maybe if he makes it up with J K Rowling, he can appear in the twelth Harry Potter movie: Harry Potter and the Deathly Acting.
