Vic_max
Iscritto in data apr 2005
Ti diamo il benvenuto nel nuovo profilo
I nostri aggiornamenti sono ancora in fase di sviluppo. Sebbene la versione precedente del profilo non sia più accessibile, stiamo lavorando attivamente ai miglioramenti e alcune delle funzionalità mancanti torneranno presto! Non perderti il loro ritorno. Nel frattempo, l’analisi delle valutazioni è ancora disponibile sulle nostre app iOS e Android, che si trovano nella pagina del profilo. Per visualizzare la tua distribuzione delle valutazioni per anno e genere, fai riferimento alla nostra nuova Guida di aiuto.
Distintivi6
Per sapere come ottenere i badge, vai a pagina di aiuto per i badge.
Valutazioni4265
Valutazione di Vic_max
Recensioni459
Valutazione di Vic_max
It's been a long time since a movie made my jaw literally drop. I went in knowing nothing, and honestly, that's the best way to experience it.
The premise is unusual, and it's one of those rare films where you really can't guess where it's going. It is technically horror, but don't let that label fool you. This is more of a mystery first, horror second. The horror elements are used mostly in a smart way, not just for shock.
If you like movies that are unpredictable and keep you guessing, this is worth seeing. And if you do enjoy it, check out the director's other film, Barbarian (2022). Also excellent, and also best watched without knowing anything ahead of time.
The premise is unusual, and it's one of those rare films where you really can't guess where it's going. It is technically horror, but don't let that label fool you. This is more of a mystery first, horror second. The horror elements are used mostly in a smart way, not just for shock.
If you like movies that are unpredictable and keep you guessing, this is worth seeing. And if you do enjoy it, check out the director's other film, Barbarian (2022). Also excellent, and also best watched without knowing anything ahead of time.
Watch this in Dolby Cinema or Regal 4DX if you are able. Both will have you immersively shaking as giant twisters wreak havoc in the film.
This is an enjoyable remake of the very successful movie Twister. Amazingly, some of the same crew worked on the original. But - the cast is all new. And - the story is updated, acknowledging the technological advancements since the first movie.
It's a nice blend of storylines about people and the power of nature, character redemption, pushing the boundaries of science - and maybe even a little (though indirectly) reference to climate change.
If you're looking for a fun action movie (and esp. If you saw and liked the original) - this is a good bet.
This is an enjoyable remake of the very successful movie Twister. Amazingly, some of the same crew worked on the original. But - the cast is all new. And - the story is updated, acknowledging the technological advancements since the first movie.
It's a nice blend of storylines about people and the power of nature, character redemption, pushing the boundaries of science - and maybe even a little (though indirectly) reference to climate change.
If you're looking for a fun action movie (and esp. If you saw and liked the original) - this is a good bet.
This movie had a number of beautiful callouts to the original movie with Gene Wilder - like the wondrous melodic tunes and the colorful "land of chocolate" imagery. I absolutely LOVED those things about this movie.
However - the movie portrays Willy Wonka as some kind of wizard, capable of doing actual magic ... not magician-type tricks, but actual conjuring of virtually any kind of physical objects or landscapes .... albeit chocolate related. This is what confused the heck out of me.
He's not supposed to have magical powers. He's supposed to be an eccentric, highly imaginative, and innovative chocolatier..
Neither the book nor the two previous movies with Wilder and Depp portray Wonka this way. Even in this movie, he's just supposed to be a magician ... but then does continuous magical conjuring throughout the movie.
I know ... the movie is a fictional fantasy and there's a lot of creative license allowed - esp. In kids movies. But I've never seen it this grossly overstated. If they wanted to go in this direction, fine - make clear at the beginning that he's a magical being.
Anyway - I did emotionally enjoy the striking visuals, the references to the music of the original, Wonka's determined optimist attitude ... and, of course, every scene with Hugh Grant. However my brain rejected the storyline for the reason I mentioned.
If you're fan of the books or.any of the previous movies - you're going to feel the need to check this out. Hopefully, you'll be more open to the storyline.
However - the movie portrays Willy Wonka as some kind of wizard, capable of doing actual magic ... not magician-type tricks, but actual conjuring of virtually any kind of physical objects or landscapes .... albeit chocolate related. This is what confused the heck out of me.
He's not supposed to have magical powers. He's supposed to be an eccentric, highly imaginative, and innovative chocolatier..
Neither the book nor the two previous movies with Wilder and Depp portray Wonka this way. Even in this movie, he's just supposed to be a magician ... but then does continuous magical conjuring throughout the movie.
I know ... the movie is a fictional fantasy and there's a lot of creative license allowed - esp. In kids movies. But I've never seen it this grossly overstated. If they wanted to go in this direction, fine - make clear at the beginning that he's a magical being.
Anyway - I did emotionally enjoy the striking visuals, the references to the music of the original, Wonka's determined optimist attitude ... and, of course, every scene with Hugh Grant. However my brain rejected the storyline for the reason I mentioned.
If you're fan of the books or.any of the previous movies - you're going to feel the need to check this out. Hopefully, you'll be more open to the storyline.
Sondaggi effettuati di recente
2 sondaggi totali effettuati