imizrahi2002

Happened to me on the way here... i went to John Williams: A Legacy in Sound... and i read the only review there and it's talking about how it's NOT a documentary and it sucks and there's hardly any MUsic... and with each comment my dropping lower and lower... because i had just finished it and thought, 'well YEAH! It not REALly a documentary and sure, the maestro doesn't start the concert off(i kept thinking, is that REALly John Williams??? WtF is going ON? When did he lost 25 years and grow his HAIR long...in FACT, where did he get that hair FROM, cuz it's REAL... and then that guy left to be replaced by the man, Hisself...in my opinion, one of the great composers of our time, be it as it may film music. Still. Great music is a blessing to the Universe, much less most animals...one of THE great achievements of humans...if we're being observed by species trying to determine whether we're worth the property, THAT's what probably saved us...HELL! Just listened to the music from 'close encounters'! How did they comMUnicate?!!? EXACTly...i rest my violin case, yer honor... if you like the man's music, marvel at all the instruments he wrote each piece for... the nuance...the way that each piece fits the story perfectly...this guy and hans zimmer, though there are a NUMber of other great film composers...but these two have conSIStently blown me away...so. It starts off a bit slow, imo, but as soon as John takes the stage? Off we go...enjoy.

NOW is the time to watch this movie. It's SCARIly prophetic...the movie 'takes place' in 2027...close enough... the last review, before this one, is from fourteen months ago. They thought it was 'relevant' then...i wish i could know what they're thinking NOW, this short time later... and yeah, i gave it all points because i didn't see ANYthing 'wrong' with this movie...i'm not going to go on and on about the different aspects/layers of filmmaking and how each is SO well done...the last reviewer said, 'the director(Cuaron) should've one(sic) an academy award...EYE think they should give him an award for a new category...'visionary storytelling', considering it was made almost twenty years ago...if you're reading this and HAVEn't seen the movie yet? It's brutal but WELL worth the journey... i'd already seen it, but...read an article about Hunnam(whom i didn't know when i first saw it, around 10 years after the movie was released. But do now) and i thought it was a different movie than the 'children of men' that i HAD seen...so i just watched it aGAIN...and it was the same movie and SO much more relevant to a LOT of what's happening now...so i got reeeeeeeal lucky.

Now to read the book it came from x p.d. James...

I have to disagree with the rating here. It IS understandable...the 'why' of it...but to reveal this would be a spoiler, in my opinion, so i'll have to keep that to myself... other than THAT, i don't understand what the problem/s was/were for people...it was your basic, 'there can be only a few', immortal stories... i think one(or maybe more) commented on this sequel being inconsistent with the first? I don't remember...but on its own i think it does really well as an action/adventure venture...the acting was very good, cinematography, editing, fight scenes...and i liked the story, as well...i would probably give it a 7.6, if that were possible...because it lacked in originality... but the execution(no pun intended) more than made up for that.