josedavid71
Iscritto in data feb 2005
Ti diamo il benvenuto nel nuovo profilo
I nostri aggiornamenti sono ancora in fase di sviluppo. Sebbene la versione precedente del profilo non sia più accessibile, stiamo lavorando attivamente ai miglioramenti e alcune delle funzionalità mancanti torneranno presto! Non perderti il loro ritorno. Nel frattempo, l’analisi delle valutazioni è ancora disponibile sulle nostre app iOS e Android, che si trovano nella pagina del profilo. Per visualizzare la tua distribuzione delle valutazioni per anno e genere, fai riferimento alla nostra nuova Guida di aiuto.
Distintivi2
Per sapere come ottenere i badge, vai a pagina di aiuto per i badge.
Valutazioni163
Valutazione di josedavid71
Recensioni9
Valutazione di josedavid71
This movie was a pleasant surprise. It was a little weird at first but then things started falling into place. Places chosen for filming, acting, dialogue, chemistry. It was all there and just a cast of 2. If I would critique anything and it's not only in this movie but with a lot of foreign films, it's the constant smoking BUT that's just a personal preference I guess.
I've seen films shot using phome cameras that are better than this. This was just a BAD movie. The acting was terrible. What was Christopher Lambert thinking. Not that he's a critically accalaimed actor or anything. The writing was terrible. Scenes were stitched together with some not making any sense in sequence of events. I love vampire movies and some of them are pretty cheesy but entertaining at least. Not this film.
This movie paled in comparison to the original and I'm aware that the original was also panned. This was a huge disappointment. I can't think of not one redeeming quality. The acting was bad (1 star) and the graphics were a bit better than the acting but not by much (1 star). The storyline tried to mimic the first but failed because of the previous reasons noted. So sad :0(...
Sondaggi effettuati di recente
5 sondaggi totali effettuati
