prohibited-name-2256
Iscritto in data feb 2005
Ti diamo il benvenuto nel nuovo profilo
I nostri aggiornamenti sono ancora in fase di sviluppo. Sebbene la versione precedente del profilo non sia più accessibile, stiamo lavorando attivamente ai miglioramenti e alcune delle funzionalità mancanti torneranno presto! Non perderti il loro ritorno. Nel frattempo, l’analisi delle valutazioni è ancora disponibile sulle nostre app iOS e Android, che si trovano nella pagina del profilo. Per visualizzare la tua distribuzione delle valutazioni per anno e genere, fai riferimento alla nostra nuova Guida di aiuto.
Distintivi2
Per sapere come ottenere i badge, vai a pagina di aiuto per i badge.
Valutazioni1627
Valutazione di prohibited-name-2256
Recensioni16
Valutazione di prohibited-name-2256
Lately, I've watched a wonderful World War 2 documentary from Frontline, so when I saw their U.S. elections episode, I was hoping that I could learn a thing or two this time as well. Nothing further from the truth.
Since the beginning, the tone is set: Donald Trump is the spoiled lucky kid with bad influences all around him, while Clinton is a passionate idealistic girl we are to feel sympathy for. Her childhood is also painted in dark colors, but while in Trump's case he soaks the evilness from his surrounding to become the man that ultimately runs for president, Hillary stands against the negative influences to become a better person. In both cases, zero evidence is given to support these claims and the fact that they use same arguments to glorify one candidate and vilify another already betrays what's to follow.
The movie is in color, but it feels so black and white - common factors are introduced to help us compare the candidates, and in each single one Hillary is the good girl, while Trump is the bad guy. For example, this "documentary" went so bonkers that they attached Martin Luther King as her role model, only to follow it up with Trump's role model... a ruthless lawyer that has taught him horrible things.
Most, if not all, guests follow that same theme too. Interestingly, everyone is a telepathic expert on Donald Trump. Without a shred of evidence, they state with 100% confidence what had which influences on Trump. He has been going to a church, which they paint as a bastion of ruthless capitalism, therefore he must have been soaking it with his eyes wide open, which must have defined him as a bad person. Obama laughed at Trump publicly? Trump is so evil that the only reason he is part of the race is because he is a bloodthirsty vengeful person. Should Americans vote for such a monster? People behind the movie try to make the decision for you, but make no mistake: you will learn nothing from it.
You can find here one of the main ingredients of why Trump has won the election: because Hillary fanboys produce this kind of one-sided venomous rhetoric that turn everything into a tabloid horror drama, which can go so far that even a person such as Trump starts to look like the good guy next to her. As such, the picture is the unfortunate extension of Clinton's horrible campaign's core points.
Since the beginning, the tone is set: Donald Trump is the spoiled lucky kid with bad influences all around him, while Clinton is a passionate idealistic girl we are to feel sympathy for. Her childhood is also painted in dark colors, but while in Trump's case he soaks the evilness from his surrounding to become the man that ultimately runs for president, Hillary stands against the negative influences to become a better person. In both cases, zero evidence is given to support these claims and the fact that they use same arguments to glorify one candidate and vilify another already betrays what's to follow.
The movie is in color, but it feels so black and white - common factors are introduced to help us compare the candidates, and in each single one Hillary is the good girl, while Trump is the bad guy. For example, this "documentary" went so bonkers that they attached Martin Luther King as her role model, only to follow it up with Trump's role model... a ruthless lawyer that has taught him horrible things.
Most, if not all, guests follow that same theme too. Interestingly, everyone is a telepathic expert on Donald Trump. Without a shred of evidence, they state with 100% confidence what had which influences on Trump. He has been going to a church, which they paint as a bastion of ruthless capitalism, therefore he must have been soaking it with his eyes wide open, which must have defined him as a bad person. Obama laughed at Trump publicly? Trump is so evil that the only reason he is part of the race is because he is a bloodthirsty vengeful person. Should Americans vote for such a monster? People behind the movie try to make the decision for you, but make no mistake: you will learn nothing from it.
You can find here one of the main ingredients of why Trump has won the election: because Hillary fanboys produce this kind of one-sided venomous rhetoric that turn everything into a tabloid horror drama, which can go so far that even a person such as Trump starts to look like the good guy next to her. As such, the picture is the unfortunate extension of Clinton's horrible campaign's core points.
I haven't written a review for IMDb for quite a while, but when I saw the nonsense some people come up with in their Chappie's reviews, I just had to!
First of all, it is a Pixar kind of story with slightly older audience in mind as there is violence in moderate doses in it. With that frame of mind, expectations have to be adjusted. After all, you don't expect a complex romance in a horror movie for example, right? And yet people write all kinds of crap about how unrealistic this movie is!
The story is very straightforward and somewhat naive, as is all the techy stuff, but this is how it's supposed to be! In the end, it's a very warm simple story with a surprising depth and emotion for what it is - and this is the best thing about the movie. Analyzing tech details and robot psychology in this kind of movie is like expecting fish in Finding Nemo to follow the exact habits real fish do and complain whenever you see discrepancies!
Die Antwoord duo lacks acting skills, true, but they more than make up for it with the unique personality that they bring to the table. Very memorable characters. And again, there's so much self-parody light humor with all the "gangsta" stuff, yet people pick up on it thinking that it's serious by intent and therefore pathetic. Good lord.
Don't get fooled by people who pretend to be critics yet even have no idea what tool to pick for the job. Original, lightweight and fun is what this movie is!
First of all, it is a Pixar kind of story with slightly older audience in mind as there is violence in moderate doses in it. With that frame of mind, expectations have to be adjusted. After all, you don't expect a complex romance in a horror movie for example, right? And yet people write all kinds of crap about how unrealistic this movie is!
The story is very straightforward and somewhat naive, as is all the techy stuff, but this is how it's supposed to be! In the end, it's a very warm simple story with a surprising depth and emotion for what it is - and this is the best thing about the movie. Analyzing tech details and robot psychology in this kind of movie is like expecting fish in Finding Nemo to follow the exact habits real fish do and complain whenever you see discrepancies!
Die Antwoord duo lacks acting skills, true, but they more than make up for it with the unique personality that they bring to the table. Very memorable characters. And again, there's so much self-parody light humor with all the "gangsta" stuff, yet people pick up on it thinking that it's serious by intent and therefore pathetic. Good lord.
Don't get fooled by people who pretend to be critics yet even have no idea what tool to pick for the job. Original, lightweight and fun is what this movie is!