widescreenguy

watching Casino for the 4th or 5th time now. it's like a clip out of the history file; the remnants of mob ownership of the famous casinos of Vegas (all of which have been now demolished for the new 'what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas'.

Sharon Stone truly impressed me with her Oscar nominated performance of the hustler that couldn't quit. it was in her blood. DeNiro on the other hand in my opinion should have earned a nomination as well as Sam Rothstein the casino owner. Quote: 'back home (east coast) they would have put me in jail, out here they give me awards'. a city awash in cash, proof of the adage 'a sucker is born every minute'.

I personally have never been to Vegas and have no intention of going. I have however been to Atlantic City and can understand how the glitter and jingle of the slots can be so mesmerizing, or more precisely saw just that happen numerous times. I never felt the tug, my suspicions confirmed one day at the local casino when I popped a token in a machine and lo, it came up 'bar' 'bar' 'off by one'. Confirmation that slots are PROGRAMMED to commit way more 'near misses' than statistical average would dictate. So I guess the 'hustle' has merely gone digital.

Very entertaining movie. Watch it before you go to the casino.

life paths crossing. the emotions, drama, pathos.

well it's been done twice before with 'Grand Canyon' and 'Crash'.

so what's new with this one? more gratuitous violence. the performances were passable, but the plot was too predictable. do I need to tick the 'spoiler' box now? also I didn't quite get the nicknames part. the stock broker up to his wazzo in gambling debt certainly wasn't happy. and if 'happy' was what he was looking for, does that mean the pop singer was looking for 'sorrow'? the sad truth is Hollyweird has run out of ideas. remake after remake, sequel after sequel.

how is this situation to be corrected? simple: billions in free cash from Washington and an announcement of a 'war on mediocrity' LOL !!!