vincentga
Iscritto in data gen 2004
Ti diamo il benvenuto nel nuovo profilo
I nostri aggiornamenti sono ancora in fase di sviluppo. Sebbene la versione precedente del profilo non sia più accessibile, stiamo lavorando attivamente ai miglioramenti e alcune delle funzionalità mancanti torneranno presto! Non perderti il loro ritorno. Nel frattempo, l’analisi delle valutazioni è ancora disponibile sulle nostre app iOS e Android, che si trovano nella pagina del profilo. Per visualizzare la tua distribuzione delle valutazioni per anno e genere, fai riferimento alla nostra nuova Guida di aiuto.
Distintivi3
Per sapere come ottenere i badge, vai a pagina di aiuto per i badge.
Recensioni62
Valutazione di vincentga
Score: 2/10
This film still shows that it is fine to be rich and make films, that is far from guaranteeing a good result. If you are horrified by completely absurd movies, well don't take a second to watch this one.
There is no doubt, however, that Hollywood "nerds" will love it. After all, you can think of Hollywood as a village where a community lives.
If there is no Royal way that leads to knowledge, so is creation. Although today in this capitalist world having money helps tremendously because we can afford tutors to educate our children, as long as we take care of them. The same goes for Health, food, housing, etc.
And even if we're mediocre, money will make us look great. Especially since criticism now is controlled by those who control the media. And if we go against these "critics" we pass for an "intellectual terrorist".
In any case, this "movie" is even more boring than listening to the speeches, the lies, of any politician.
This film still shows that it is fine to be rich and make films, that is far from guaranteeing a good result. If you are horrified by completely absurd movies, well don't take a second to watch this one.
There is no doubt, however, that Hollywood "nerds" will love it. After all, you can think of Hollywood as a village where a community lives.
If there is no Royal way that leads to knowledge, so is creation. Although today in this capitalist world having money helps tremendously because we can afford tutors to educate our children, as long as we take care of them. The same goes for Health, food, housing, etc.
And even if we're mediocre, money will make us look great. Especially since criticism now is controlled by those who control the media. And if we go against these "critics" we pass for an "intellectual terrorist".
In any case, this "movie" is even more boring than listening to the speeches, the lies, of any politician.
Another film (as in at least 80% of cases) that should have been refrained from doing so much is ridiculous. It still shows that it's not really actors, directors, etc. which are important but the scenario, the story (which accounts for 80% of the films).
Film supposedly "historical" but as in the majority of this type of film we learn nothing at all.
We wanted to pay homage in this film: "This film is dedicated to all of which lives have been impacted by the events at Dunkirk."
What a tribute to have created such a cr***y film! We can still say that in this film everything is at the same level (ridiculous): scenarios, acting, music, etc. It only has the technicality that is doing well but it is not even a quality because thanks to electronics technology is now easily acquired.
This film is not a historical film but is supposed to be a film "Tribute". Objective completely missed!
When the score of 7.9 / 10, it shows that all data that is in a computer can be tampered with and give the numbers that you want to have. But the important thing is that humans believe in these scores.
We should show the score after we have given a note. Since most people are sheep, they are easily influenced. The scores are nothing and this film is the proof.
Besides the scores, prices, etc. are never objective. They are given by humans. If this film had been analyzed objectively it would have been 7.9 but at most 3/10.
It is enough to give a name known and bang it is extraordinary even if in fact it is cr***y.
If you want to fall asleep this movie is for you. Otherwise it is better to buy a good book on the subject. Ideally asked a historian and not a store for whom money is the only goal and not history.
Film supposedly "historical" but as in the majority of this type of film we learn nothing at all.
We wanted to pay homage in this film: "This film is dedicated to all of which lives have been impacted by the events at Dunkirk."
What a tribute to have created such a cr***y film! We can still say that in this film everything is at the same level (ridiculous): scenarios, acting, music, etc. It only has the technicality that is doing well but it is not even a quality because thanks to electronics technology is now easily acquired.
This film is not a historical film but is supposed to be a film "Tribute". Objective completely missed!
When the score of 7.9 / 10, it shows that all data that is in a computer can be tampered with and give the numbers that you want to have. But the important thing is that humans believe in these scores.
We should show the score after we have given a note. Since most people are sheep, they are easily influenced. The scores are nothing and this film is the proof.
Besides the scores, prices, etc. are never objective. They are given by humans. If this film had been analyzed objectively it would have been 7.9 but at most 3/10.
It is enough to give a name known and bang it is extraordinary even if in fact it is cr***y.
If you want to fall asleep this movie is for you. Otherwise it is better to buy a good book on the subject. Ideally asked a historian and not a store for whom money is the only goal and not history.
This "film", this "thing" is worthy of what 99% of Hollywood produces: big s**t.
Immensely rich people, producers, who have no talent except to be rich and who pays nothing to their country (no taxes, no taxes, etc. - because they are rich and they are the ones who create the laws and represents "justice").
For them created s**t is the daily lot and it does not cost them anything because in the end it is the people who pay.
We still learn a few things from this s**t: Iggy Pop is a dwarf. Adam Driver has gotten even bigger since he shot in the "Star Wars" (another s***t - special effects and a silly "story" that is repeated from movie to movie). Driver does not like "Chloë Sevigny" at all. Jim Jarmusch is the new Mel Brooks: a Jew with money not to know what to do and realize and realize that s***t. But his "community" supports it. Chloë Sevigny is well dressed for once. This film helped make pocket money for the actors. They needed it to feed the money they have in tax havens. Hollywood will continue to produce s**t as long as it exists.
If you die of boredom this movie will finish you and will make you die.
For them created s**t is the daily lot and it does not cost them anything because in the end it is the people who pay.
We still learn a few things from this s**t: Iggy Pop is a dwarf. Adam Driver has gotten even bigger since he shot in the "Star Wars" (another s***t - special effects and a silly "story" that is repeated from movie to movie). Driver does not like "Chloë Sevigny" at all. Jim Jarmusch is the new Mel Brooks: a Jew with money not to know what to do and realize and realize that s***t. But his "community" supports it. Chloë Sevigny is well dressed for once. This film helped make pocket money for the actors. They needed it to feed the money they have in tax havens. Hollywood will continue to produce s**t as long as it exists.
If you die of boredom this movie will finish you and will make you die.