homegnome1

Wow, I was really disappointed in this sequel. There were so many vaudeville style scenes that were contrived, slapstick-ish, and to boot - really bad dialog and acting. The staged camera angles were first year student nonsense. It seemed that every fight scene tried to outdo any other ever made in speed, deftness, etc - all that meant to the audience was a blur of sword noises and the opportunity for seizures. The original Star Trek (the series) Klingon sounded more natural than the elvish and Ork noises I sat through, and more naturally delivered. The first Hobbit movie was so professional, so well done - this one is just a mess. Save your money and wait for the DVD.

Who? Should be Why? Why would Ram Gopal Varma make yet another ridiculous "horror/comedy" movie? Why would Urmila agree to take this horrible role? Why did I waste several hours of my life watching this? There were too few characters in this movie(three)and it was limited to one set, which made it more suitable for a stage play versus film. That alone did not make it a bad movie, the plot alone would probably make an incredible stage play. However, Urmila's bad acting (this coming from a big fan) and the ridiculous script made it insufferable. And of course, RGV's insistence on atrociously bad "horror movie music", you know the kind that -bump bump bump, thump- shakes you up waiting for something bad to happen and it's just the wind. It's not innovative, not thought provoking, not even interesting. Plot twists abound to the point where you don't even care. Halfway through the movie you hope everyone dies so you don't have to suffer anymore.