BigMez

There are many good aspects to this crime movie but they're ultimately undone by a very weak main character.

Things start off very promising as we're introduced to various members of the Cody family. All of whom are experienced, lifelong criminals. I'll forego the plot synopsis as it's been addressed by other reviewers. And as many other reviewers here have noted, the supporting actors all give great performances. It's true. It's the movie's greatest asset and is enough to warrant seeing this movie at least once.

In terms of comparing this movie to other crime movies, it's similar to "At Close Range" starring Sean Penn and Christopher Walken. That movie was also about a young man being introduced into a tight knit family of criminals led by a paranoid and dangerous patriarchal figure.

But the movie's strength also points to a glaring problem: the main character is a dull pill with zero personality. He's merely a pawn to be moved this way and that as the story dictates. He doesn't have any ambition, nor does he strive to improve his lot in life. As such, it's impossible to care what happens to him. Again the burden of story falls upon the other family members and the choices they make to keep things going. All of whom are far more engaging and fascinating than 'J'. As the family members are done in one by one, the number of interesting characters begins to dwindle. And with it, the viewer's interest in what's gong on.

It'll be interesting to see what this filmmaker does next. He definitely has a grasp on effectively telling a good story, and he understands when to reign in his actors and when to unleash 'em. I hope next time he invests more time into developing his main character as he does his supporting ones.

I just got back from an L.A. screening of Hostel. I haven't seen an effective horror film like this in a long time. My stomach was still knotted up after we left the screening. The last time I felt like that was when I saw ALIENS for the first time about 19 years ago. Since then, no other horror film has ever made me feel like that. I certainly didn't expect it from this one. As much as I loved Cabin Fever, I'm not blind to the shortcomings of its script. As such,I was expecting more of the same from Hostel - dark humor, gore, and a sense of dread. I'm happy to see that director Eli Roth has taken a big step forward in becoming a better storyteller and filmmaker.

Admittedly my heart sank when the film began. The scenes introducing the main characters were blandly shot and edited. All I could think was, 'Oh no. Roth succumbed to some unseen studio pressure to make a normal-looking horror flick'. The style was typical of the what you'd see in crap like I know what you did last summer. But in very subtle ways, the blandness gets washed away and as our heroes enter the threshold of Hell, the style of the film changes as well. This, I learned during the Q&A afterwards with Roth, was intentional.

If you've read some of the other reviews posted here from people who saw it at the Toronto Film Festival, you get the general idea of the story. Contrary to what you might've heard, this is not a 90 minute film on torture. The torture scenes are brief and to the point. Roth doesn't wallow in pointless gore. And this is where I think it shows how he's improved as a filmmaker. He's more interested in scenes and ideas that move the story forward. Yes, there is plenty of gore, but it's relevant to the story and doesn't exist just for it's own sake.

One of the aspects of this film that made it so powerful was how Roth created a sense of helpless and inevitability. He provides the dark setup, throws in a sympathetic character, and begins twisting the screws and ratcheting up the suspense. This isn't a movie where you turn off your brain to enjoy it. On the contrary. The more you think about it, the more horrifying it becomes. You begin putting yourself into the character's situation and wondering what you'd do. When you realize that there is no hope for the character, no way to escape, no 'buddy' who's gonna turn up at the last minute to save the hero, and not a shred of humanity or compassion to the antagonists, real fear begins to set in.

Another great element in the script is how the 'survivor' makes moral choices that define their character. Instead of being merely reactive like the characters in Cabin Fever, the survivor makes several decisions which change the course of the story. It's a sign of well thought-out script and a filmmaker who cares about the fate of his characters.

For horror fans, this is an absolute must-see. It's so refreshing to see a horror movie that actually makes you feel uncomfortable and one in which you have no idea what's going to happen next. As for the gore, I was surprised by what they got away with. Although there were no credits at the end of the film, the cut I saw was rated R by the MPAA and according to Roth, he didn't cut anything out.