robinhio84_
Iscritto in data ago 2012
Ti diamo il benvenuto nel nuovo profilo
Stiamo ancora lavorando all'aggiornamento di alcune funzionalità del profilo. Per visualizzare I loghi, le suddivisioni delle valutazioni e i sondaggi per questo profilo, vai a versione precedente.
Valutazioni1284
Valutazione di robinhio84_
Recensioni223
Valutazione di robinhio84_
While not for everyone today, this movie brings back perfect entertainment memories from when I was a kid. One of my favourites of all time. Hence the high rating.
Two-line Summary: What a joy to have finally rediscovered this movie over 30 years later. As a child between six and nine, this was pure magic - and today, I'm watching it again.
Story Summary: A girl goes on a whimsical, sometimes chaotic, fantasy-filled journey that captured the imagination of younger viewers in a way few films dared. It's packed with exaggerated drama, charm, and color all through the lens of a child's world.
Analysis: This is one of those rare kids' movies that knew exactly who it was made for and fully committed to it. It didn't try to be clever for adults or chase a wider audience. Instead, it immersed kids in a fantasy world, with campy energy, loud expressions, and moments that stuck. I watched it sometime between six and nine years old, and for me, it became a core memory, just like Labyrinth.
The line that haunted my brain for decades? "Sinky Watsky." That mispronunciation of "Cincinnati" stuck with me for 30+ years and honestly, that's how I finally tracked this movie down.
Dialogue: 7/10 Over-the-top, dramatic, and full of playful exaggeration exactly what kids that age love. As a non-native English speaker, it was accessible and clear, which made me feel part of the story instead of lost in it.
Acting: 8/10 Campy, expressive, theatrical. Think big eyes, bold moves, and characters who felt larger than life. Again perfect for school kids. These performances weren't about subtlety; they were about fun and emotion, and they hit the mark. Again for the target group it was perfect
Visuals & Decor: 9/10 Bright, surreal, immersive. The sets felt like walking into a dream. The visuals were bold enough to hold a child's attention and rich enough to be remembered three decades later.
Makeup & Costumes: 9/10 Fantastical and fun. They helped build a world that felt unique and enchanting to a child's eyes. Not realistic, but that was never the goal. The designs made every character feel iconic.
Special Effects: By today's standards, simple but they worked. Nothing looked polished or high-tech, but the low-budget charm added to the feel. The effects were exactly what a child needed to believe in the fantasy.
Music: I don't remember the songs as "good" in a musical sense - but I remember them, and that says something. What stood out more was the length: this was a long movie for a child, and yet, I never got bored. I even begged my dad not to turn it off halfway through.
Anything Else: It had a surprisingly strong cast, which might fly over kids' heads but is fun to rediscover now. The film may not have aged well for adults, but it's not meant to. It didn't try to be timeless - it just wanted to be a great afternoon for kids, and it nailed that.
Overall Assessment: It might seem dated, silly, or even cringey to some now. But for the age group it was targeting, it was a full-on immersive ride. And that's worth celebrating. It's rare to find a film so unpretentious - one that just wants to entertain children and lets everything else go.
End Words: I look back at this movie with full nostalgia and genuine love. I'm about to rewatch it, and I won't knock a single point off. This 10 is for what it meant to me as a child, and for how beautifully it fulfilled the job it set out to do: spark joy, fantasy, and wonder. For that kid I was, this film was absolute perfection. In the same vain as Legend or Labyrinth. For critics it's probably unjust to put a movie like this in a list with those movies. But for my younger brain it was literally, just as good. It was so well done that 30 years later it got me curious to find that ¨Sinksy watsky¨ movie once again. And that is something only a handful of movies are able to do.
Two-line Summary: What a joy to have finally rediscovered this movie over 30 years later. As a child between six and nine, this was pure magic - and today, I'm watching it again.
Story Summary: A girl goes on a whimsical, sometimes chaotic, fantasy-filled journey that captured the imagination of younger viewers in a way few films dared. It's packed with exaggerated drama, charm, and color all through the lens of a child's world.
Analysis: This is one of those rare kids' movies that knew exactly who it was made for and fully committed to it. It didn't try to be clever for adults or chase a wider audience. Instead, it immersed kids in a fantasy world, with campy energy, loud expressions, and moments that stuck. I watched it sometime between six and nine years old, and for me, it became a core memory, just like Labyrinth.
The line that haunted my brain for decades? "Sinky Watsky." That mispronunciation of "Cincinnati" stuck with me for 30+ years and honestly, that's how I finally tracked this movie down.
Dialogue: 7/10 Over-the-top, dramatic, and full of playful exaggeration exactly what kids that age love. As a non-native English speaker, it was accessible and clear, which made me feel part of the story instead of lost in it.
Acting: 8/10 Campy, expressive, theatrical. Think big eyes, bold moves, and characters who felt larger than life. Again perfect for school kids. These performances weren't about subtlety; they were about fun and emotion, and they hit the mark. Again for the target group it was perfect
Visuals & Decor: 9/10 Bright, surreal, immersive. The sets felt like walking into a dream. The visuals were bold enough to hold a child's attention and rich enough to be remembered three decades later.
Makeup & Costumes: 9/10 Fantastical and fun. They helped build a world that felt unique and enchanting to a child's eyes. Not realistic, but that was never the goal. The designs made every character feel iconic.
Special Effects: By today's standards, simple but they worked. Nothing looked polished or high-tech, but the low-budget charm added to the feel. The effects were exactly what a child needed to believe in the fantasy.
Music: I don't remember the songs as "good" in a musical sense - but I remember them, and that says something. What stood out more was the length: this was a long movie for a child, and yet, I never got bored. I even begged my dad not to turn it off halfway through.
Anything Else: It had a surprisingly strong cast, which might fly over kids' heads but is fun to rediscover now. The film may not have aged well for adults, but it's not meant to. It didn't try to be timeless - it just wanted to be a great afternoon for kids, and it nailed that.
Overall Assessment: It might seem dated, silly, or even cringey to some now. But for the age group it was targeting, it was a full-on immersive ride. And that's worth celebrating. It's rare to find a film so unpretentious - one that just wants to entertain children and lets everything else go.
End Words: I look back at this movie with full nostalgia and genuine love. I'm about to rewatch it, and I won't knock a single point off. This 10 is for what it meant to me as a child, and for how beautifully it fulfilled the job it set out to do: spark joy, fantasy, and wonder. For that kid I was, this film was absolute perfection. In the same vain as Legend or Labyrinth. For critics it's probably unjust to put a movie like this in a list with those movies. But for my younger brain it was literally, just as good. It was so well done that 30 years later it got me curious to find that ¨Sinksy watsky¨ movie once again. And that is something only a handful of movies are able to do.
Here's your revised review for *Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull*:
**Story Summary**: Indiana Jones is back, older but still adventurous, embarking on a quest to uncover the mystery behind the Crystal Skull. He faces Soviet powers and forces from beyond, in a story that tries to blend nostalgia with modern sensibilities.
**Analysis**: The movie's biggest downfall is its attempt to recapture the 80s adventure style, which doesn't resonate well with today's audience. What once worked now feels out of place, making the film largely forgettable.
**Story and General Flow**: The plot is fragmented and lacks the vitality of earlier films. Indiana Jones thrived in a campy, adventure-driven era, but the attempt to resurrect that style in this film results in a movie that feels out of touch. The story goes overboard, turning camp into a detractor rather than an asset. **(2/10)**
**Dialogue**: The dialogue tries too hard to evoke nostalgia, leading to cringeworthy moments that don't land well in a contemporary setting. **(4/10)**
**Acting**: Harrison Ford brings grace and charm to his aging Indiana Jones, but he feels like an odd outlier in a plot that never truly comes to life. His on-screen son is barely memorable, and the rest of the cast is forgettable. **(6/10)**
**Visuals, Decor, Costume & Makeup**: These elements are the strongest aspects of the film, with well-crafted sets and costumes that enhance the period feel. **(9/10)**
**Special Effects**: The film suffers from an overdose of CGI, which feels overused and out of place, taking viewers out of the experience. **(5/10)**
**Music**: John Williams' score is competent but not particularly memorable. It serves its purpose without standing out. **(6/10)**
**Anything Else**: The movie fails to bring the franchise into the modern era, instead delivering a watered-down rehash that feels more like a missed opportunity than a worthy continuation. For the franchise to succeed, future films need to innovate rather than replicate.
**Overall Assessment**: While it's a missed opportunity, *Kingdom of the Crystal Skull* does offer some nostalgic enjoyment and solid visuals. However, it falls short in key areas, making it a difficult recommendation even for fans. **(4/10)**
**End Word**: I remain hopeful for the 2023 installment, hoping the lessons learned here lead to a more fitting continuation of Indiana Jones' legacy.
**Story Summary**: Indiana Jones is back, older but still adventurous, embarking on a quest to uncover the mystery behind the Crystal Skull. He faces Soviet powers and forces from beyond, in a story that tries to blend nostalgia with modern sensibilities.
**Analysis**: The movie's biggest downfall is its attempt to recapture the 80s adventure style, which doesn't resonate well with today's audience. What once worked now feels out of place, making the film largely forgettable.
**Story and General Flow**: The plot is fragmented and lacks the vitality of earlier films. Indiana Jones thrived in a campy, adventure-driven era, but the attempt to resurrect that style in this film results in a movie that feels out of touch. The story goes overboard, turning camp into a detractor rather than an asset. **(2/10)**
**Dialogue**: The dialogue tries too hard to evoke nostalgia, leading to cringeworthy moments that don't land well in a contemporary setting. **(4/10)**
**Acting**: Harrison Ford brings grace and charm to his aging Indiana Jones, but he feels like an odd outlier in a plot that never truly comes to life. His on-screen son is barely memorable, and the rest of the cast is forgettable. **(6/10)**
**Visuals, Decor, Costume & Makeup**: These elements are the strongest aspects of the film, with well-crafted sets and costumes that enhance the period feel. **(9/10)**
**Special Effects**: The film suffers from an overdose of CGI, which feels overused and out of place, taking viewers out of the experience. **(5/10)**
**Music**: John Williams' score is competent but not particularly memorable. It serves its purpose without standing out. **(6/10)**
**Anything Else**: The movie fails to bring the franchise into the modern era, instead delivering a watered-down rehash that feels more like a missed opportunity than a worthy continuation. For the franchise to succeed, future films need to innovate rather than replicate.
**Overall Assessment**: While it's a missed opportunity, *Kingdom of the Crystal Skull* does offer some nostalgic enjoyment and solid visuals. However, it falls short in key areas, making it a difficult recommendation even for fans. **(4/10)**
**End Word**: I remain hopeful for the 2023 installment, hoping the lessons learned here lead to a more fitting continuation of Indiana Jones' legacy.