imdb-2921
Iscritto in data nov 2003
Ti diamo il benvenuto nel nuovo profilo
I nostri aggiornamenti sono ancora in fase di sviluppo. Sebbene la versione precedente del profilo non sia più accessibile, stiamo lavorando attivamente ai miglioramenti e alcune delle funzionalità mancanti torneranno presto! Non perderti il loro ritorno. Nel frattempo, l’analisi delle valutazioni è ancora disponibile sulle nostre app iOS e Android, che si trovano nella pagina del profilo. Per visualizzare la tua distribuzione delle valutazioni per anno e genere, fai riferimento alla nostra nuova Guida di aiuto.
Distintivi2
Per sapere come ottenere i badge, vai a pagina di aiuto per i badge.
Recensioni6
Valutazione di imdb-2921
Woensdag is a Dutch horror movie made on a ridiculously thin budget that takes its inspiration from 70s slasher movies.
A new TV show is being made called 'Camp Slasher'. In it, there are 8 young men and women who are placed inside a tent in the middle of a dark forest that, apparently, is haunted by the ghost of an old lumberjack. They are given assignments to go find clues in the forest that will lead them to their escape from the forest, BUT they must be careful for when the ghost of the lumberjack catches you, you're out of the game. Those that escape from the forest get to walk away with prize of 50000 euros. The TV crew has cameras setup throughout the forest, and inside the masks of their killer actors so the people watching at home won't miss anything of the action in the woods. Problems however start to arise when the ghost of the lumberjack turns out to be a little more than just local folklore...
The total budget of this movie was a whopping 5000 euros, and it shows. The cast is made up of unknowns, most of which don't appear to have any acting skills at all. The lighting is crap most of the time, and the sound could use a bit of polish as well.
It's not all bad though. The studio segments are both convincing and funny. Particularly the effect they use to show a contestant has left the game.
Like any good 70s slasher movie, there's a gratuitous boobie shot. Like any good 70s slasher movie, the story is nothing more than a thinly veiled excuse to allow the filming of the killings. It's insignificant, and not particularly original either. Like any good 70s slasher movie, there are quite a lot of kills for you gore hounds to enjoy. Most of them are in reasonably well-lit areas, so no scream in the dark that is to mean the person has died, which is sort of a plus. Sort of, because the budget constraints made the wounds look really fake. Some kills are off-camera, but even those will make you laugh.
At 75 minutes it's a short movie, but I feel this is another good thing. Some scenes already feel a bit stretched out, but overall the pace is okay. It would be easy to lengthen the movie to the more standard 90 minutes, but it would slow this movie down to a crawl.
If you're looking for a horror movie that will have you sitting at the edge of your seat, biting your nails and jumping up from it every few minutes, you'll be sorely disappointed. If, on the other hand, you're in a joyful mood, and like to laugh at some really fake killings in a low-budget movie, look no further. If you like the concept of being put in a bad place, with cameras all around for the enjoyment of the home-front, take a look at the Japanese masterpiece Battle Royale.
Overall, they clearly had fun making this movie, and did a great job at maximizing the effectiveness of their budget, but it's still the Achilles heel of this movie. I think most casual moviegoers will want to skip this one. If you're into low-budget slasher movies, give this one a go. It's not the best you'll ever see, but it probably won't be the worst one either.
A new TV show is being made called 'Camp Slasher'. In it, there are 8 young men and women who are placed inside a tent in the middle of a dark forest that, apparently, is haunted by the ghost of an old lumberjack. They are given assignments to go find clues in the forest that will lead them to their escape from the forest, BUT they must be careful for when the ghost of the lumberjack catches you, you're out of the game. Those that escape from the forest get to walk away with prize of 50000 euros. The TV crew has cameras setup throughout the forest, and inside the masks of their killer actors so the people watching at home won't miss anything of the action in the woods. Problems however start to arise when the ghost of the lumberjack turns out to be a little more than just local folklore...
The total budget of this movie was a whopping 5000 euros, and it shows. The cast is made up of unknowns, most of which don't appear to have any acting skills at all. The lighting is crap most of the time, and the sound could use a bit of polish as well.
It's not all bad though. The studio segments are both convincing and funny. Particularly the effect they use to show a contestant has left the game.
Like any good 70s slasher movie, there's a gratuitous boobie shot. Like any good 70s slasher movie, the story is nothing more than a thinly veiled excuse to allow the filming of the killings. It's insignificant, and not particularly original either. Like any good 70s slasher movie, there are quite a lot of kills for you gore hounds to enjoy. Most of them are in reasonably well-lit areas, so no scream in the dark that is to mean the person has died, which is sort of a plus. Sort of, because the budget constraints made the wounds look really fake. Some kills are off-camera, but even those will make you laugh.
At 75 minutes it's a short movie, but I feel this is another good thing. Some scenes already feel a bit stretched out, but overall the pace is okay. It would be easy to lengthen the movie to the more standard 90 minutes, but it would slow this movie down to a crawl.
If you're looking for a horror movie that will have you sitting at the edge of your seat, biting your nails and jumping up from it every few minutes, you'll be sorely disappointed. If, on the other hand, you're in a joyful mood, and like to laugh at some really fake killings in a low-budget movie, look no further. If you like the concept of being put in a bad place, with cameras all around for the enjoyment of the home-front, take a look at the Japanese masterpiece Battle Royale.
Overall, they clearly had fun making this movie, and did a great job at maximizing the effectiveness of their budget, but it's still the Achilles heel of this movie. I think most casual moviegoers will want to skip this one. If you're into low-budget slasher movies, give this one a go. It's not the best you'll ever see, but it probably won't be the worst one either.
This movie clearly demonstrates why people shouldn't give other people their home-made movies.
The story, what little you can find of it, is that 2 twin brothers go to visit their aunt Lacy at her farm. The place is supposedly being kept in shape by Jeremy, but he's kinda busy killing people and using their corpses for sexual gratification. The twins begin finding body parts and grow weary of Jeremy. On top of this, Lucy has been alone too long and now finds herself lusting for one of her nephews. Eventually the twins decide enough's enough and try to get away. There's plenty of sick stuff going on, but the rest of the movie is so annoying, you'd be hard-pressed to even notice.
To my amazement, I actually found something not that bad in this movie. The guy playing Jeremy looked truly freakish and was doing a fairly decent job acting.
Absolutely everything else in the movie was undeniable crap though.
It was cut with a spoon, and put back together using chewing gum or something. You went from scene 1 with (extremely annoying) background music playing, to a silent shot of some scenery. No fading out the sounds here, instead they chop it off mid-tone. I lost count of the amount of times there was a crackle or pop when they put 2 scenes together.
The assembled corpses looked okay, but then someone would stand over one and work it over with an axe, getting blood sprayed into him from the side. Come on people, stuff like that isn't rocket science.
The lighting sucked in that oftentimes you couldn't see anything, but even more often everything was way, WAAY too bright, having the same end result.
The dialog, notably absent for the first 5 minutes of the film, was stupid and (st)uttered completely unconvincing. The redneck with Down's syndrome accents of the twins didn't help either.
This movie also has a rather large abundance of walking, sleeping, running, sitting doing nothing, reading the damn newspaper (and not noticing anything to help the story along), awkward silences and more, equally enjoyable filler.
The guy handling the camera seemed to be having Parkingsons disease or something. They couldn't even take a shot of the moon without shaking the camera!
To round it all off, they decided to add a (gasp) plot twist (!) at the end of the movie. If only the creative genius that dreamed that one up had been able to stay focused during the other 90 minutes of the film...
That this movie got a 3.7 here is a miracle in itself, and it's certainly undeserved. The fact that it's a home-movie doesn't excuse it from being the crap that it is.
This movie isn't fun, shocking, entertaining or gruesome. It's a dull, slow, boring, fake, cheap dog of a movie, and your time would be better spent watching paint dry.
The story, what little you can find of it, is that 2 twin brothers go to visit their aunt Lacy at her farm. The place is supposedly being kept in shape by Jeremy, but he's kinda busy killing people and using their corpses for sexual gratification. The twins begin finding body parts and grow weary of Jeremy. On top of this, Lucy has been alone too long and now finds herself lusting for one of her nephews. Eventually the twins decide enough's enough and try to get away. There's plenty of sick stuff going on, but the rest of the movie is so annoying, you'd be hard-pressed to even notice.
To my amazement, I actually found something not that bad in this movie. The guy playing Jeremy looked truly freakish and was doing a fairly decent job acting.
Absolutely everything else in the movie was undeniable crap though.
It was cut with a spoon, and put back together using chewing gum or something. You went from scene 1 with (extremely annoying) background music playing, to a silent shot of some scenery. No fading out the sounds here, instead they chop it off mid-tone. I lost count of the amount of times there was a crackle or pop when they put 2 scenes together.
The assembled corpses looked okay, but then someone would stand over one and work it over with an axe, getting blood sprayed into him from the side. Come on people, stuff like that isn't rocket science.
The lighting sucked in that oftentimes you couldn't see anything, but even more often everything was way, WAAY too bright, having the same end result.
The dialog, notably absent for the first 5 minutes of the film, was stupid and (st)uttered completely unconvincing. The redneck with Down's syndrome accents of the twins didn't help either.
This movie also has a rather large abundance of walking, sleeping, running, sitting doing nothing, reading the damn newspaper (and not noticing anything to help the story along), awkward silences and more, equally enjoyable filler.
The guy handling the camera seemed to be having Parkingsons disease or something. They couldn't even take a shot of the moon without shaking the camera!
To round it all off, they decided to add a (gasp) plot twist (!) at the end of the movie. If only the creative genius that dreamed that one up had been able to stay focused during the other 90 minutes of the film...
That this movie got a 3.7 here is a miracle in itself, and it's certainly undeserved. The fact that it's a home-movie doesn't excuse it from being the crap that it is.
This movie isn't fun, shocking, entertaining or gruesome. It's a dull, slow, boring, fake, cheap dog of a movie, and your time would be better spent watching paint dry.
What an awful, awful, awful movie. I tried *REALLY* hard to find something worth while in this and came up empty. I did enjoy the ending of the movie immensely, but that was only because it meant my suffering was over.
The story (which is *completely* irrelevant to the actual movie) is that some guy rapes and kills a woman on his brother's property. The guy goes to jail and because his brother tried to help him cover up the act he goes in for accessory to murder. He then escapes, meets up with his girlfriend and then introduces her to the 'gifts' he has stored in the basement, which is just a couple of people that somehow wronged him at his trial. He intends to kill them and her, so she tries to escape, struggles with and then subsequently kills the brother.
She's now home alone with 3 people that incidentally also wronged her in the past, so it's payback time.
At this point the movie has finally reached the part that people watching this movie paid for. Problem is it took almost 40 minutes to get there, and a *LOT* of those 40 minutes were spent watching long stupid scenes of nothing shot like your dad would film something with his handycam while walking. The background noise during this was a bunch of annoying buzzes and shreeks. Guess even soundtracks cost a lot of money these days.
The acting... It's a stretch to even call what they are doing 'acting', but for argument's sake let's do so. It's terrible. There's a scene where one of the 'actors' actually laughs when he's clearly supposed to be in pain. My guess is these 'actors', if they were even slightly serious about their acting career, pretty much blew it by signing on for this movie. If they had an agent, he should be shot (or worse, be forced to watch this movie).
There's a whole bunch of nudity in the movie, and while the main subject isn't exactly ugly, she probably won't become Miss Universe anytime soon. I think she's also the most tattoo-covered girl I've seen on film ever. There's a pretty explicit up-close and personal masturbation scene with her too, but that's about it. When she then does a similar thing with one of her captives, there's a striking lack of close-ups of the act. If anything would've been considered shocking (which is probably what the movie was intended to do) *THAT* would've been it.
Oh yeah, to keep some sort of story going, every so often they cut to black and white segments of her moaning on about why who did what. Aside from the fact that absolutely nobody cares about the story, this monotonous monologue is about as interesting as listening to someone reading entries out of the phone book.
If you have any plans at all to go watch this, PLEASE DON'T! If you wanted to see it for the shock-value, watch either "I Spit On Your Grave (1978)" or the less sexual "Broken" video by Nine Inch Nails front man Trent Reznor. And if you wanted to just see the naked girl, rent a porno. I can guarantee you it'll be more interesting, have a better story, makeup, lighting, acting and BUDGET, and give you a lot more value for your dollar.
0 out of 10. Avoid at all cost.
The story (which is *completely* irrelevant to the actual movie) is that some guy rapes and kills a woman on his brother's property. The guy goes to jail and because his brother tried to help him cover up the act he goes in for accessory to murder. He then escapes, meets up with his girlfriend and then introduces her to the 'gifts' he has stored in the basement, which is just a couple of people that somehow wronged him at his trial. He intends to kill them and her, so she tries to escape, struggles with and then subsequently kills the brother.
She's now home alone with 3 people that incidentally also wronged her in the past, so it's payback time.
At this point the movie has finally reached the part that people watching this movie paid for. Problem is it took almost 40 minutes to get there, and a *LOT* of those 40 minutes were spent watching long stupid scenes of nothing shot like your dad would film something with his handycam while walking. The background noise during this was a bunch of annoying buzzes and shreeks. Guess even soundtracks cost a lot of money these days.
The acting... It's a stretch to even call what they are doing 'acting', but for argument's sake let's do so. It's terrible. There's a scene where one of the 'actors' actually laughs when he's clearly supposed to be in pain. My guess is these 'actors', if they were even slightly serious about their acting career, pretty much blew it by signing on for this movie. If they had an agent, he should be shot (or worse, be forced to watch this movie).
There's a whole bunch of nudity in the movie, and while the main subject isn't exactly ugly, she probably won't become Miss Universe anytime soon. I think she's also the most tattoo-covered girl I've seen on film ever. There's a pretty explicit up-close and personal masturbation scene with her too, but that's about it. When she then does a similar thing with one of her captives, there's a striking lack of close-ups of the act. If anything would've been considered shocking (which is probably what the movie was intended to do) *THAT* would've been it.
Oh yeah, to keep some sort of story going, every so often they cut to black and white segments of her moaning on about why who did what. Aside from the fact that absolutely nobody cares about the story, this monotonous monologue is about as interesting as listening to someone reading entries out of the phone book.
If you have any plans at all to go watch this, PLEASE DON'T! If you wanted to see it for the shock-value, watch either "I Spit On Your Grave (1978)" or the less sexual "Broken" video by Nine Inch Nails front man Trent Reznor. And if you wanted to just see the naked girl, rent a porno. I can guarantee you it'll be more interesting, have a better story, makeup, lighting, acting and BUDGET, and give you a lot more value for your dollar.
0 out of 10. Avoid at all cost.