blinkchester

Here we have a movie that exemplifies exactly what makes a journey. We have the actual journey, 93 days and 1100 miles. We have the means which is hiking along the Pacific Crest Trail (PCT). We also can look at the emotional path taken, coming to terms with traumatic events and heading towards self-discovery.

The cinema experience in itself is a journey. We travel to the pictures while opening our minds as we are taken into a distorted reality. Escaping our own world and allowing the auteur to take control of our minds. In Wild we can share that journey with Reese Witherspoon. Based on the memoirs of Cheryl Strayed about her hike along the PCT, Wild was adapted for the big screen by Nick Horny of High Fidelity and Fever Pitch fame.

Reese Witherspoon fully deserved her Oscar nomination for leading this movie. Likable yet ambiguous as Strayed, Witherspoon is able to capture the demons from Strayed's past, yet have the audience empathise with her circumstances. She effectively transitions from the green under prepared hiker to the tough worldly achievement. A character who feels that all the beauty has gone out of the world, falls to her knees in a touching scene when she achieves self-discovery. It is fair to say, that sometimes to move forward, you have to break yourself right down.

Is it a voyage of self-loathing? Punishment? Adventure? Possibly a test of endurance? A testament to the reality portrayed here is that lines are blurred. Life is a journey, you meet many interesting characters along the way, but in the end you must realise that you are responsible for your own actions.

You will not lose interest in this film as you grow with the character. This is not an advertisement for hiking, the hike could be represented in many ways. Give this one a chance, the journey is worth it.

Dark Comedy, Horror, Satirical, ironic and twisted… These are just some of the words which can be used to describe Marjane Satrapi's genre bender. After appearing on a list of the best unmade screenplays in 2009, The Voices see's the light of day in 2015.

Ryan Reynolds plays Jerry, a schizophrenic loser, a boy trapped inside a man's body, struggling to fit in within a town of averages. An average job in a bathtub factory in a town in which very little ever happens leads to very surreal events. Reynolds is turning out to be one of Hollywood's forgotten stars, turning in a fantastic performance. Deranged yet sympathetic. He is supported by Gemma Arterton, superbly playing the 'office fit' Fiona. Arterton deftly switches between the confident curvaceous leaders of the account ladies, to the vulnerable Brit a long way from home. Even better is Anna Kendrick, as the less noticeable account girl, Lisa. Lisa is everything Fiona is not, she is safe, trusting and passive.

This may not be the type of film you would expect to find two of Hollywood's leading ladies in, but nothing about The Voices is straightforward. The plot unfolds through Jerry's deranged viewpoint, blurring the lines between imagination and reality. In Jerry's reality his animals talk to him, cleverly representing the struggle within his personality. Without looking to spoil any surprises, Jerry may be responsible for many evil acts, but this struggle shows him less evil but more sympathetic. Jerry continues to spiral out of control and it is only when we get a glimpse of reality, we see the tortured soul, living above an abandoned bowling alley, away from any human contact and still suffering from aggressive contact from his past.

I have heard The Voices described as funny. This is not necessarily misleading advertising. There may not be too many laugh out loud jokes, but the situational comedy is fantastic. The closing credits expertly round off a surreal exaggeration of laughter, but also a touching exploration of mental health.

It is no surprise that Reynold's campaigned to lead this film. It will leave you feeling a little uneasy and very unsure. If you're thinking of watching this one, ask your dog first… Or maybe your cat

The Royal Rumble has traditionally been one of my favourite events, and i've been a wrestling fan for a good few years now. The other shows may have better matches, but i've always found the actual rumble match to be full of excitement.

I'm not going to reveal the winners of any match as i don't see it as fair to ruin the results on a review. I will comment on the quality of them though.

We have the standard 4 matches, and then the big rumble event. Two from Smackdown and two from Raw.

Shawn Michaels and Edge open up for Raw. This proves to be a good match from two talented guys. This is a match i'd recommend watching. It's hard to sum up without giving away the winner.

Next we have the usual Undertaker against some big nasty monster, be whoever it is. Giant Gonzales, Yokozuna, Kamala... well this time it's Heidenreich. Its also a casket match. Typical Undertaker fare. Watch if you're a fan. I have to admit i am, purely for the entertainment factor. It can hardly be regarded as a classic wrestling match.

The next two matches are the title matches. For once Smackdown manages to upstage Raw. Their title match is pretty thrilling and enjoyable, but with a anti-climax and let down to end it. Raw's match is a pretty dull and boring affair, which is a pity as i'm a fan of both guys involved.

Now to the main reason i love the event, the rumble. It's a pretty good one this year. Coming up to the event we all had a pretty good idea of who might win, and it may not prove a big surprise, but hey, its very enjoyable. There are the usual diverse ways of people being eliminated. There is the token guy who doesn't make it to the ring, the entrant who is ridiculous and we all want to see vanquished, and someone gets eliminated by a previously eliminated combatant. It has its usual highs and lows, and i loved the ending, in particular the Vince McMahon entrance.

I'd recommend this show. Not the WWE on top form, but its still good. Add it to your collection.