drbits
Iscritto in data ott 2008
Ti diamo il benvenuto nel nuovo profilo
I nostri aggiornamenti sono ancora in fase di sviluppo. Sebbene la versione precedente del profilo non sia più accessibile, stiamo lavorando attivamente ai miglioramenti e alcune delle funzionalità mancanti torneranno presto! Non perderti il loro ritorno. Nel frattempo, l’analisi delle valutazioni è ancora disponibile sulle nostre app iOS e Android, che si trovano nella pagina del profilo. Per visualizzare la tua distribuzione delle valutazioni per anno e genere, fai riferimento alla nostra nuova Guida di aiuto.
Distintivi6
Per sapere come ottenere i badge, vai a pagina di aiuto per i badge.
Valutazioni37
Valutazione di drbits
Recensioni17
Valutazione di drbits
I was disappointed with the first Lego Movie's end and was looking forward to the conclusion (5 years later?).
But the constant changes between superfast action with no dialog and the dialog with no action put me to sleep.
But the constant changes between superfast action with no dialog and the dialog with no action put me to sleep.
Other reviewers stress that this show is full of hype. That is true, but this is not politics. It is a response from scientists to the widespread lies hyped by others for profit. These lies are presented in entertaining ways that convince US consumers and voters. Scientists have so far failed to convince the public that the scientific method and journalistic integrity are important - one should not believe somebody because of bombast or other personality traits.
The first episode of the show (about climate change) is scientifically spot on. The next few episodes are not as well done. Specifically, the issues are not well defined or not as well researched.
Each show ends with a group discussion. The producers appear to be having trouble finding scientific experts who can explain the facts to the public. Many episodes leave out discussion of important related issues.
The first episode of the show (about climate change) is scientifically spot on. The next few episodes are not as well done. Specifically, the issues are not well defined or not as well researched.
Each show ends with a group discussion. The producers appear to be having trouble finding scientific experts who can explain the facts to the public. Many episodes leave out discussion of important related issues.