thomasubieda
Iscritto in data feb 2024
Ti diamo il benvenuto nel nuovo profilo
I nostri aggiornamenti sono ancora in fase di sviluppo. Sebbene la versione precedente del profilo non sia più accessibile, stiamo lavorando attivamente ai miglioramenti e alcune delle funzionalità mancanti torneranno presto! Non perderti il loro ritorno. Nel frattempo, l’analisi delle valutazioni è ancora disponibile sulle nostre app iOS e Android, che si trovano nella pagina del profilo. Per visualizzare la tua distribuzione delle valutazioni per anno e genere, fai riferimento alla nostra nuova Guida di aiuto.
Distintivi4
Per sapere come ottenere i badge, vai a pagina di aiuto per i badge.
Valutazioni360
Valutazione di thomasubieda
Recensioni191
Valutazione di thomasubieda
A controversial sequel, lacking much sense, unnecessary for many, and definitely a big step back for the saga.
"I Still Know What You Did Last Summer" is a rushed installment that doesn't take itself very seriously or coordinate its ideas in an orderly manner, as it was given the green light just a year after its predecessor. Right from there, that's the first flaw for this sequel. I think it was based on making money rather than anything else because it even sets aside that small potential the previous one had.
It's a rather simple movie with mediocre performances, a meager narrative, continuity errors, plot holes, technical flaws, and honestly, a very poor script, senseless and flat. It's incredible the regression this sequel has with the saga; it constantly loses substance, connection, and the audience's expectations.
"I Still Know What You Did Last Summer" makes very obvious mistakes at all times, its execution is the most absurd and unbelievable in terms of slasher film stories. It leaves much to talk about, think about, and even imagine, due to the assumption of a better elaboration for all this. It simply takes the same premise but makes it worse. It's incredible the amount of such conventional mistakes that are seen on screen. From director Danny Cannon, there's not much to highlight, it was definitely disappointing.
Once again, we have Jennifer Love Hewitt in her leading role, but even though she is a pretty face and a total beauty in general, her performance is mediocre, senseless, forced, and not believable. The exaggeration in this second part is abysmal. Regarding other personnel, it's even worse, mentioning the performance of Brandy Norwood, please!
There is no good plot, no memorable characters, no solid narrative arguments, no good soundtrack, no photography, among other things, nothing that stands out. Maybe the best thing you'll see, and from a comedic perspective, is the character played by Jack Black, maybe.
A sequel that has no forgiveness whatsoever, but for a large sector, it's a good movie. If that's the case, my respects. From my perspective, it doesn't meet expectations and is quite mediocre. A better execution could have made it something more "entertaining." Far from being the same as the first installment.
3.5/10.
"I Still Know What You Did Last Summer" is a rushed installment that doesn't take itself very seriously or coordinate its ideas in an orderly manner, as it was given the green light just a year after its predecessor. Right from there, that's the first flaw for this sequel. I think it was based on making money rather than anything else because it even sets aside that small potential the previous one had.
It's a rather simple movie with mediocre performances, a meager narrative, continuity errors, plot holes, technical flaws, and honestly, a very poor script, senseless and flat. It's incredible the regression this sequel has with the saga; it constantly loses substance, connection, and the audience's expectations.
"I Still Know What You Did Last Summer" makes very obvious mistakes at all times, its execution is the most absurd and unbelievable in terms of slasher film stories. It leaves much to talk about, think about, and even imagine, due to the assumption of a better elaboration for all this. It simply takes the same premise but makes it worse. It's incredible the amount of such conventional mistakes that are seen on screen. From director Danny Cannon, there's not much to highlight, it was definitely disappointing.
Once again, we have Jennifer Love Hewitt in her leading role, but even though she is a pretty face and a total beauty in general, her performance is mediocre, senseless, forced, and not believable. The exaggeration in this second part is abysmal. Regarding other personnel, it's even worse, mentioning the performance of Brandy Norwood, please!
There is no good plot, no memorable characters, no solid narrative arguments, no good soundtrack, no photography, among other things, nothing that stands out. Maybe the best thing you'll see, and from a comedic perspective, is the character played by Jack Black, maybe.
A sequel that has no forgiveness whatsoever, but for a large sector, it's a good movie. If that's the case, my respects. From my perspective, it doesn't meet expectations and is quite mediocre. A better execution could have made it something more "entertaining." Far from being the same as the first installment.
3.5/10.
A movie with a simple premise very similar to many of its time, but it manages to entertain. Its cinematic approach is well-executed.
"I Know What You Did Last Summer" is the beginning of a saga that had its advantages in a simple yet effective way, with a narrative arc that had good potential, which in turn was not greatly exploited, falling into the conventional and boring for many, even being very similar to other greats of the genre, as the similarities are evident. The movie has an attractive narrative, but with poor execution; I emphasize the waste of its development after introducing its basic theme, which for films of the genre doesn't promise much more.
It's another slasher installment that had its significance, but not a great impact on a cinematic level. It was more focused on being visually striking due to its cast and attractive faces for the audience. One can also mention the typical teenage killer character, but its theme is a bit darker, although it lacks the impact of the greats of the genre, giving that twist of revenge and something more earthly.
The excellent cinematographic work of Jim Gillespie should be highlighted. The director adds very attractive tracking camera shots, which still look very pleasant today. Even the initial sequence is quite enjoyable (setting aside the script). Some moments of suspense, chase, or character journeys are well executed, providing that overall focus on the environment.
However, the movie does not escape from conventional moments, continuity errors, coincidences, plot holes, forced performances, and a weak script. The waste of its potential is abysmal, being considered very predictable and/or boring for many. It's one of those movies that if you take it too seriously, you'll have a terrible time, but for entertainment or passing the time, it does the job.
Everything related to its camera angles (some), the soundtrack, the slasher essence, and the potential of a script that could have been better executed, has made for an experience that is not excellent, but pleasant. It could have been much better, no doubt about it.
Jennifer Love Hewitt is a total beauty.
5.5/10.
"I Know What You Did Last Summer" is the beginning of a saga that had its advantages in a simple yet effective way, with a narrative arc that had good potential, which in turn was not greatly exploited, falling into the conventional and boring for many, even being very similar to other greats of the genre, as the similarities are evident. The movie has an attractive narrative, but with poor execution; I emphasize the waste of its development after introducing its basic theme, which for films of the genre doesn't promise much more.
It's another slasher installment that had its significance, but not a great impact on a cinematic level. It was more focused on being visually striking due to its cast and attractive faces for the audience. One can also mention the typical teenage killer character, but its theme is a bit darker, although it lacks the impact of the greats of the genre, giving that twist of revenge and something more earthly.
The excellent cinematographic work of Jim Gillespie should be highlighted. The director adds very attractive tracking camera shots, which still look very pleasant today. Even the initial sequence is quite enjoyable (setting aside the script). Some moments of suspense, chase, or character journeys are well executed, providing that overall focus on the environment.
However, the movie does not escape from conventional moments, continuity errors, coincidences, plot holes, forced performances, and a weak script. The waste of its potential is abysmal, being considered very predictable and/or boring for many. It's one of those movies that if you take it too seriously, you'll have a terrible time, but for entertainment or passing the time, it does the job.
Everything related to its camera angles (some), the soundtrack, the slasher essence, and the potential of a script that could have been better executed, has made for an experience that is not excellent, but pleasant. It could have been much better, no doubt about it.
Jennifer Love Hewitt is a total beauty.
5.5/10.
An entertaining movie that is not excellent, but has its essence, questionable negative points, and still delivers.
"JLA Adventures: Trapped in Time" is a super simple proposal for the little ones at home, but it is also enjoyable for fans of DC animated films, with a sustainable premise that has shortcomings due to various scenes that take you out of context because of certain arguments that were not taken into consideration. However, despite this, it offered attractive moments. "Trapped in Time" is a super simple offering for the little ones at home, but it is also enjoyable for fans of DC animated films, with a sustainable premise that has shortcomings due to various scenes that take you out of context because certain arguments were not taken into consideration, but despite that, it provided attractive moments. This movie is a rollercoaster of emotions because you might not like it or simply let it pass by to find something that catches your attention.
Regarding the animation, I think it has its advantages and disadvantages, as the movement sequences, color tones, action sequences, and some character designs are decent, making it coherent for a small production like this. However, the focus on many of the characters' faces is debatable. Many of them are not well drawn or were done in a very strange manner, which can slightly diminish the experience.
It should also be added that the movie does not escape the conventional, the neglect of each hero or villain's abilities by the script, the forced comedy, the scenes that make no sense at all, the excessive addition of characters, and perhaps small plot holes that have no answers.
In that sense, I think it's valid or fun to see many of your heroes fight their enemies, watching them work together (even if it's a little) and contributing something more to the animated films.
Lex Luthor will always be a great villain, even though sometimes he forgets how intelligent he is. I must highlight the action scenes of Karate Kid. The plots involving time travel and its consequences always catch attention.
"JLA Adventures: Trapped in Time" is a super simple proposal for the little ones at home, but it is also enjoyable for fans of DC animated films, with a sustainable premise that has shortcomings due to various scenes that take you out of context because of certain arguments that were not taken into consideration. However, despite this, it offered attractive moments. "Trapped in Time" is a super simple offering for the little ones at home, but it is also enjoyable for fans of DC animated films, with a sustainable premise that has shortcomings due to various scenes that take you out of context because certain arguments were not taken into consideration, but despite that, it provided attractive moments. This movie is a rollercoaster of emotions because you might not like it or simply let it pass by to find something that catches your attention.
Regarding the animation, I think it has its advantages and disadvantages, as the movement sequences, color tones, action sequences, and some character designs are decent, making it coherent for a small production like this. However, the focus on many of the characters' faces is debatable. Many of them are not well drawn or were done in a very strange manner, which can slightly diminish the experience.
It should also be added that the movie does not escape the conventional, the neglect of each hero or villain's abilities by the script, the forced comedy, the scenes that make no sense at all, the excessive addition of characters, and perhaps small plot holes that have no answers.
In that sense, I think it's valid or fun to see many of your heroes fight their enemies, watching them work together (even if it's a little) and contributing something more to the animated films.
Lex Luthor will always be a great villain, even though sometimes he forgets how intelligent he is. I must highlight the action scenes of Karate Kid. The plots involving time travel and its consequences always catch attention.