alex-460
Iscritto in data mag 2000
Ti diamo il benvenuto nel nuovo profilo
I nostri aggiornamenti sono ancora in fase di sviluppo. Sebbene la versione precedente del profilo non sia più accessibile, stiamo lavorando attivamente ai miglioramenti e alcune delle funzionalità mancanti torneranno presto! Non perderti il loro ritorno. Nel frattempo, l’analisi delle valutazioni è ancora disponibile sulle nostre app iOS e Android, che si trovano nella pagina del profilo. Per visualizzare la tua distribuzione delle valutazioni per anno e genere, fai riferimento alla nostra nuova Guida di aiuto.
Distintivi9
Per sapere come ottenere i badge, vai a pagina di aiuto per i badge.
Recensioni6
Valutazione di alex-460
It's so well done, so well acted, directed, photographed, naturally decorated, that ALL other series made in Spain suddenly become worse to the viewer's eye.
Shot in 14:9, the series shows the work of a peaceful A-Teamesque group that solves all kind of problems by making simulations. The four members investigate, plan, get props and act to create fake situations that turn around the oppression caused to their clients by changing the point of view of these oppressors in the most unexpected and better clock-working way.
Fun to watch, intriguing and great in concept, this remake of the Argentinian hit with the same name is by far on the top of the Spanis TV fiction as of today.
Shot in 14:9, the series shows the work of a peaceful A-Teamesque group that solves all kind of problems by making simulations. The four members investigate, plan, get props and act to create fake situations that turn around the oppression caused to their clients by changing the point of view of these oppressors in the most unexpected and better clock-working way.
Fun to watch, intriguing and great in concept, this remake of the Argentinian hit with the same name is by far on the top of the Spanis TV fiction as of today.
Before going to see this movie, I already felt positive about it, just because of the aesthetics, like many other people had done. My expectations were as when I go to see a Pixar movie, a Fincher's, a Woody Allen's, I was thinking I somehow knew enough to like it, like it had a quality sign printed in its look and concept, like it was giving back a genre it had disappeared a long time ago. Certainly it is a homage to a world that never exists anymore.
¿So what's the problem? I am afraid it's everything else, mainly the director. Script isn't touching, and that's a horrible start, but could have been relatively solved. It's not. The director doesn't seem to know where to place the camera and for how long, and I know it's hard to believe when you consider the pre-production for that film. Usually watchers get tired of beautiful shots of CGIs in other movies, here the director unbelievably missuses them.
Actors don't seem to understand what the hell is going on and just say line after line. For example, they don't make any sings of fear when they confront danger. Not to talk about love. They don't shout when being on a plane followed by other artifacts shooting at them.
The presence of Sir Lawrence Olivier is a total waste. It could have been used more deeply, more dramatically, but it ends being anecdotic and recurring to his image is simply useless.
That's when you come thinking about the difference between Spielberg and Conran. With a simple pastiched idea one created magic, the other one created a superficial lot of nothing.
¿So what's the problem? I am afraid it's everything else, mainly the director. Script isn't touching, and that's a horrible start, but could have been relatively solved. It's not. The director doesn't seem to know where to place the camera and for how long, and I know it's hard to believe when you consider the pre-production for that film. Usually watchers get tired of beautiful shots of CGIs in other movies, here the director unbelievably missuses them.
Actors don't seem to understand what the hell is going on and just say line after line. For example, they don't make any sings of fear when they confront danger. Not to talk about love. They don't shout when being on a plane followed by other artifacts shooting at them.
The presence of Sir Lawrence Olivier is a total waste. It could have been used more deeply, more dramatically, but it ends being anecdotic and recurring to his image is simply useless.
That's when you come thinking about the difference between Spielberg and Conran. With a simple pastiched idea one created magic, the other one created a superficial lot of nothing.
A lot of people say this movie is terribly funny. I think more or less the same ammount of people is sure this is one of the biggest stupidities ever done. Why? Taste. My father didn't like it. We watched it together and I explained him all the jokes I found. He said things like "Do you really find it funny?" or "I don't think Tim Burton was conscient of this VERY little critic". So what can I say against this? I recommend you to watch this movie. It's a risk, but it can be grateful. Warning: Jokes pass so fast that you could need a lot of time for finding all of them.
Well, there are some things that you could like to know before watching the movie. Don't watch it if you don't have any sense of humor. Don't watch it if you don't like a movie which you can smile with and not only laugh. Don't watch it if you can get offended with anti american jokes. Don't watch if if you love the president (doesn't matter which one). Watch it if you are not silly. (Many people wont care at this)
Well, there are some things that you could like to know before watching the movie. Don't watch it if you don't have any sense of humor. Don't watch it if you don't like a movie which you can smile with and not only laugh. Don't watch it if you can get offended with anti american jokes. Don't watch if if you love the president (doesn't matter which one). Watch it if you are not silly. (Many people wont care at this)
Sondaggi effettuati di recente
43 sondaggi totali effettuati