Cartman-13
Iscritto in data nov 2000
Ti diamo il benvenuto nel nuovo profilo
I nostri aggiornamenti sono ancora in fase di sviluppo. Sebbene la versione precedente del profilo non sia più accessibile, stiamo lavorando attivamente ai miglioramenti e alcune delle funzionalità mancanti torneranno presto! Non perderti il loro ritorno. Nel frattempo, l’analisi delle valutazioni è ancora disponibile sulle nostre app iOS e Android, che si trovano nella pagina del profilo. Per visualizzare la tua distribuzione delle valutazioni per anno e genere, fai riferimento alla nostra nuova Guida di aiuto.
Distintivi3
Per sapere come ottenere i badge, vai a pagina di aiuto per i badge.
Recensioni12
Valutazione di Cartman-13
Very gory and creepy movie with very gruesome scenes, tons of monsters and demons, (some were cool, some had pretty poor CGI) .
Was it as good as the first 2 movies? No...
Did I keep comparing Harbour to Perlman? Yes... for about a third of the movie.
Was it entertaining? Yes... You'll do yourself a favor to surrender yourself to the movie instead of thinking it'll compare to del Toro's films
Was it as good as the first 2 movies? No...
Did I keep comparing Harbour to Perlman? Yes... for about a third of the movie.
Was it entertaining? Yes... You'll do yourself a favor to surrender yourself to the movie instead of thinking it'll compare to del Toro's films
I had low expectations for this, and after watching it, I really just think they should have put more effort & money into it.
You won't see the gore that was in the first 2 movies, mostly just splattering blood, but the story and change of scenery was a nice twist.
The lower budget is evident. I thought the acting was fine except for a couple over-the-top performances. The first half set up was good, but the second half just seemed rushed. Maybe they were running out of money.
I thought they should have expanded on the new Las Vegas Hunting Club set up a lot more. Was it purely for betting purposes? Were the Hunters paid to perform or were they paying to kill as in the first movies?
The first kill had potential, but it felt unfinished... The second kill made no sense at all. The third one screamed for a higher budget...
Someone once said that they don't understand why they are remaking great movies, what they should be doing is remaking not so good movies. This is a candidate for the latter.
You won't see the gore that was in the first 2 movies, mostly just splattering blood, but the story and change of scenery was a nice twist.
The lower budget is evident. I thought the acting was fine except for a couple over-the-top performances. The first half set up was good, but the second half just seemed rushed. Maybe they were running out of money.
I thought they should have expanded on the new Las Vegas Hunting Club set up a lot more. Was it purely for betting purposes? Were the Hunters paid to perform or were they paying to kill as in the first movies?
The first kill had potential, but it felt unfinished... The second kill made no sense at all. The third one screamed for a higher budget...
Someone once said that they don't understand why they are remaking great movies, what they should be doing is remaking not so good movies. This is a candidate for the latter.
Sondaggi effettuati di recente
4 sondaggi totali effettuati
