Un drammatico mistero in cui un adolescente tormentato subisce un terrificante esorcismo nella speranza di svelare segreti sconvolgenti sulla chiesa e sulla sua famiglia.Un drammatico mistero in cui un adolescente tormentato subisce un terrificante esorcismo nella speranza di svelare segreti sconvolgenti sulla chiesa e sulla sua famiglia.Un drammatico mistero in cui un adolescente tormentato subisce un terrificante esorcismo nella speranza di svelare segreti sconvolgenti sulla chiesa e sulla sua famiglia.
- Regia
- Sceneggiatura
- Star
James Clayton
- Student
- (as James D Thomas)
Shane Schoeppner
- Hooded Priest
- (as Shane Schoeppner)
Victoria Rose
- Young Michelle
- (as Victoria Mueller)
Recensioni in evidenza
I can tell, that they really tried to do something serious and great with this b-class movie - but oh my did it ever go wrong. It starts ok. We have this confusing modern family with some 25+ year old teenagers that go to this school that really is so absurd that you will just start wondering if this is going to turn out as a comedy after all.
Well they tried horror, that does not work at all - there is nothing horrory in this movie. They tried suspense, well that didn't work either. So what do we have? We have a movie that sucks so hard and gets so hilariously bad towards the end that you'll just wonder what the actual f did I just watch and more importantly WHY? It can't be unseen, sadly.
There are some decent actors here. The script is - well childish, outdated and ridiculously bad. Even the sounds are messed up pretty bad.
Well they tried horror, that does not work at all - there is nothing horrory in this movie. They tried suspense, well that didn't work either. So what do we have? We have a movie that sucks so hard and gets so hilariously bad towards the end that you'll just wonder what the actual f did I just watch and more importantly WHY? It can't be unseen, sadly.
There are some decent actors here. The script is - well childish, outdated and ridiculously bad. Even the sounds are messed up pretty bad.
The only interesting thing about this movie was Adrienne Barbeau (played Carol on Maude) and they only gave her a small part. Third rate CGI's a bad script that goes nowhere and characters with no depth. Boring and oh so long.
Positive: now i know there's a plastic surgery centre for nuns.
Negative: 1h31min.
I must admit that I picked up the 2019 horror mystery "Gates of Darkness" as I saw the cover. And when I saw that both Tobin Bell and John Savage was on the cast list, of course I sat down to watch director Don E. FauntLeRoy's 2019 movie.
And while I did manage to sit through the entire movie, then writers Robert Hickman, Lesley-Anne Down, Chris Kanik and Randolf Turrow just didn't collectively manage to write an overly interesting or compelling storyline. Sure, it was watchable, but this movie was hardly an outstanding foray into the demonic possession and exorcism subgenre of horror movies.
It felt like the writers were trying to accomplish more than they were capable of delivering, and it definitely felt like they tried to cram everything that worked in previous demonic possession and exorcism movies into one movie, and that would be "Gates of Darkness". Yeah, well the movie just didn't really play out that way.
In fact, the storyline in the movie felt forced, wooden and as it was lacking a natural fluidity to it. It felt staged and awkward actually. And this reflected poorly on the actors and actresses, as they were struggling with an inferior script and storyline. And the fact that the character gallery in the movie was pretty weak didn't exactly boost their chances of delivering something grand either.
Now, it should be said that "Gates of Darkness" actually have a rather good ensemble of actors and actresses on the cast list, which includes the likes of Tobin Bell, John Savage, Adrienne Barbeau, Lesley-Anne Down and Mary Mouser. Just a shame that they had so very little to work with in terms of script, story and characters.
Visually then "Gates of Darkness" had nothing grand to offer. There weren't exactly an abundance of special effects or CGI effects in the movie. And whatever were there served their purpose well enough, but don't expect to be blown away by a grand display.
Ultimately then "Gates of Darkness" is not an impressive foray into the horror mystery genre, and this is the type of movie that you will watch once, and never again, only to completely forget about the movie existing. My rating of "Gates of Darkness" lands on a three out of ten stars.
And while I did manage to sit through the entire movie, then writers Robert Hickman, Lesley-Anne Down, Chris Kanik and Randolf Turrow just didn't collectively manage to write an overly interesting or compelling storyline. Sure, it was watchable, but this movie was hardly an outstanding foray into the demonic possession and exorcism subgenre of horror movies.
It felt like the writers were trying to accomplish more than they were capable of delivering, and it definitely felt like they tried to cram everything that worked in previous demonic possession and exorcism movies into one movie, and that would be "Gates of Darkness". Yeah, well the movie just didn't really play out that way.
In fact, the storyline in the movie felt forced, wooden and as it was lacking a natural fluidity to it. It felt staged and awkward actually. And this reflected poorly on the actors and actresses, as they were struggling with an inferior script and storyline. And the fact that the character gallery in the movie was pretty weak didn't exactly boost their chances of delivering something grand either.
Now, it should be said that "Gates of Darkness" actually have a rather good ensemble of actors and actresses on the cast list, which includes the likes of Tobin Bell, John Savage, Adrienne Barbeau, Lesley-Anne Down and Mary Mouser. Just a shame that they had so very little to work with in terms of script, story and characters.
Visually then "Gates of Darkness" had nothing grand to offer. There weren't exactly an abundance of special effects or CGI effects in the movie. And whatever were there served their purpose well enough, but don't expect to be blown away by a grand display.
Ultimately then "Gates of Darkness" is not an impressive foray into the horror mystery genre, and this is the type of movie that you will watch once, and never again, only to completely forget about the movie existing. My rating of "Gates of Darkness" lands on a three out of ten stars.
Very slow moving. This isn't even B rated it's more like D- rated. I expected more when I seen the actor from Saw played in it but he was the only thing that kept me watching. Snooze fest. Still don't quite understand what happened in the movie
Lo sapevi?
- QuizRandy Shelly received medical attention twice on set for exhaustion during his performance.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Gates of Darkness?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Sito ufficiale
- Lingue
- Celebre anche come
- Изгоняющий дьявола. Врата
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Ventura Farms - 235 W. Potrero Road, Thousand Oaks, California, Stati Uniti(Lake House Location)
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
- Tempo di esecuzione
- 1h 31min(91 min)
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti