Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA panel of three judges hear court cases, argue the merits of the case amongst themselves, and render a verdict.A panel of three judges hear court cases, argue the merits of the case amongst themselves, and render a verdict.A panel of three judges hear court cases, argue the merits of the case amongst themselves, and render a verdict.
- Premi
- 4 candidature totali
Sfoglia gli episodi
Recensioni in evidenza
It realY BOTHERS Judge Corriero wnthen an achild is suing aparent. He believes that it is wron to sue a parent or grandparent . He should leave the show because he doesnt think parents can be at fault. His concern is old fashioned Italian family structure.
I don't know how this show has remained on the air for 5 years. Judge Judy created it, but these judges don't compare well to her. Perhaps it's their focus on achieving unanimity that makes too many of their decisions seem unfair. Oftentimes, I find myself agreeing with Judge Acker when she dissents. (Although she was never on the bench in real life, she's the best judge on this panel, IMHO.) Judge Corriero wears his heart on his sleeves, sometimes inappropriately. I was gobsmacked when he practically apologized to a pit bull owner for ruling in favor of the plaintiff who had sued her for damages related to an attack by the defendant's dog. Whaaat?!? Lastly, what's up with Judge DiMango and Judge Corriero's inability (or refusal) to call the litigants by their names. Every one is "you," "he," "she".... They disrespect the litigants by not bothering to address them by name. Plus, for those of us who aren't staring at the TV the entire time to see on whom the camera is focused (because we're multi-tasking), it's hard to follow along. Even Judge Judy, who is probably older than DiMango and Corriero, can recall and use the names of the parties who come before her. How hard is that? (And if it is hard, the show's producers should place name cards on the front of the podia.) "Hot Bench" is amateur hour compared to Judge Judy. She should give Judge Acker her own show and be done with it.
Regardless of the case facts, Judge Corriere favors the women over men, and if the
plaintiff and defendant are both
women, then if it's a black woman over white, the white woman will lose. Try my theory and see.
Then Judge Acker is all about race, and usually favors the black However, she is very good
about getting to the basics about the case. Acker&Demango both are good at what they do.
Judge Demango, I view as the centrist in this trio and has her
head on straight. She follows case law regardless of gender
or race. Which is the way a judge should handle their cases. She represents the show
very well. Hats off to her.
I used to love this show. The judges were fair in their decisions and respectful of the litigants. I enjoyed watching the show. In the last couple of months, the show has devolved into more of a WWF version of lawyers. Which judge can be more rude, which one can yell over the litigants, who can be more insulting? This applies only to the women; Judge Corriero has maintained a professional demeanor.
What happened to the female judges? I can imagine a memo from Judge Judy (who I have never liked nor watched because of her insulting manner) instructing the judges to be more edgy. I have news for you, some lace around her robe does not soften her; a big smile from Judge DiMango or Judge Acker after they have shouted over the litigants does not soften their behavior at all.
I guess you are looking for an audience who cheers abusive behavior instead of applauding people treating each other with respect.
What happened to the female judges? I can imagine a memo from Judge Judy (who I have never liked nor watched because of her insulting manner) instructing the judges to be more edgy. I have news for you, some lace around her robe does not soften her; a big smile from Judge DiMango or Judge Acker after they have shouted over the litigants does not soften their behavior at all.
I guess you are looking for an audience who cheers abusive behavior instead of applauding people treating each other with respect.
Today's episode was the last straw!! I agree that Judges Acker & Dimango have their moments but Judge Corriero totally disregards the facts in the case and makes up new ones. A young Lyft driver sued a woman for literally pulling out of a spot right into his car. She claimed to be parallel parking but clearly she was pulling out. Of course, no insurance!!! Since the plaintiff stated he didn't see her, Judge C took that to mean she was parking rather then the more logical she was pulling out. I don't know about you but I assume parked cars are staying that way. He is such a bleeding heart that it makes it impossible to enjoy the program. Time to hang up the robe!!!
Lo sapevi?
- QuizPatricia is a retired New York City supreme court judge. Tanya & Larry are lawyers.
- ConnessioniSpoofed in Il Saturday Night Live: Emma Thompson/Jonas Brothers (2019)
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How many seasons does Hot Bench have?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was Hot Bench (2014) officially released in Canada in English?
Rispondi