Diddy on Trial: As It Happened

Since no cameras are actually allowed inside the courtroom, it's great to witness what's actually going on! The actors are doing a wonderful and realistic job of making you feel like you're actually inside the courtroom. But what's even better is the commentary from the fabulous Sunny Hostin and the variety of experts, she's chosen who add a whole new dimension to the series, making it not just a gripping trial but an entertaining, thought-provoking one as well! I was thrilled to see the compelling, brilliant, and always a pleasure to watch Mark Eiglarsh on the show! I've watched him for years on various TV and News Shows and his objectivity, professionalism and charisma are always a joy to witness!

I got into this because I didn't knew anything about the whole diddy fiasco. But this was seriously truly hard to watch and I could not even make it past the 2nd episode.

Normally I am not sensitive to flashing and flickering lights at all, and the warning stated: "Some flashing lights sequences or patterns may affect photosensitive viewers."

But WOW, this was so extreme that it made me nauseous even trying to watch it. I sincerely do not recommend.

Literally between every scene and courtroom switch, it flickers, over the top kid you not. This is unnecessary and ruined the whole watching experience for me.

Really?

This is called a "documentary" or reporting nowadays?

I felt embarrassed watching this re-enactment-pseudo-theater-something.

Do yourself a favor and watch Ashleigh Banfield, Stephanie Soo or even Nancy Grace (anything and everything is better than this) if you want the real juicy stuff about the trial.

This, this was neither reporting nor documenting - this was ...bewildering, alienating.

What do these producers think? "Ah lets quickly make a student-re-enactment-Diddy-trial project."?

"This is so hip - everyone is gonna be glued to the screen, and we'll get so many clicks..and we'll cash in some more?" How desperate do you have to be as a production company to create sthg like this?

Flabbergasting.

Can't tell if this is supposed to be a re-enactment or a spoof. Not sure if anyone in this "documentary" if that is what this is classified as, was actually in the courtroom. Seriously weird and hard to watch.

There is so much content on this case by people who are there in the courtroom witnessing the events, telling a believable story by comparison, this seems super juvenile. Who are these people and what credibility do they have? For anyone with an ounce of intelligence, this is just too hard to watch.

Listen to a podcast before wasting time on this.

Not sure what else to say. Can't recommend. Watch at your own expense.