Shotyi Bole Shotyi Kichhu Nei

Golpo Holeo Sotti attempts to weave together elements of folklore, faith, and socio-political commentary into a thought-provoking cinematic experience. One aspect that particularly stood out was the film's portrayal of Sanatan Hinduism, especially in its more orthodox or traditionalist form. The filmmakers clearly intended to explore the cultural roots and spiritual dimensions of the faith, though the execution occasionally veers toward portraying a narrower, more rigid perspective of the community.

While artistic liberty is part and parcel of storytelling, I sincerely hope that in future works-especially in the wake of deeply unsettling events like the Murshidabad incident-filmmakers will take a more measured and balanced approach. It's crucial that upcoming films make a conscious effort to represent the Hindu community as it truly exists on the ground: diverse, layered, and overwhelmingly peaceful.

Sanatan Dharma is a tradition that embraces tolerance, philosophical depth, and coexistence. Yet, public narratives-both in news media and popular entertainment-often reduce it to simplistic binaries. Cinema holds immense power to either reinforce these reductive views or challenge them by offering more holistic and respectful representations.

As such, while Golpo Holeo Sotti deserves recognition for initiating a conversation around faith and community identity, it also serves as a reminder of how much more needs to be done in portraying Hinduism, and its followers, with authenticity and empathy. One can only hope that future films will rise to this responsibility-moving past stereotypes and dramatizations-and instead highlight the lived realities, spiritual richness, and peaceful foundations that define the Hindu way of life.

Shotyi Bole Shotyi Kichhu Nei starts with an intriguing premise-blending dark humor and social commentary-but stumbles under the weight of uneven storytelling and underdeveloped characters. The film's satirical take on societal hypocrisy and existential crises holds potential, yet the script struggles to balance tone, oscillating awkwardly between slapstick comedy and introspective drama without committing fully to either.

Performances are a mixed bag: while the lead actor brings sporadic charm, much of the supporting cast feels wooden, failing to elevate thinly written roles. The pacing drags in the second act, with repetitive dialogues and predictable twists that sap momentum. Directorially, the vision feels muddled-ambitious visual metaphors (like recurring motifs of emptiness) are overshadowed by cluttered framing and jarring edits.

The soundtrack, though catchy, often feels misplaced, undercutting emotional beats. While the film's critique of materialism and identity in modern Kolkata is timely, its message gets lost in a sea of half-baked subplots.

A missed opportunity. Watch only for fleeting moments of wit, but don't expect depth or coherence. Forgettable, despite its bold ambitions.

The Movie released on OTT Hoichoi on 18th April, 2025 explores really a fresh idea and perfectly makes its Celluloid portrayal. The theme of the Movie is too unique. It is an effort to unmask all representing different sections of the society and bringing into fore realities. But this has been done following a unique pattern. Everything gets focused during informal conversations where contradictory opinions, prejudices, arguments, biasness and others keep the momentum going. 12 people express opinions on a single matter almost all through the Movie. So dialogues serve the most important part here.

The Movie starts with birthday celebration of a judge who is scheduled to announce verdict on a murder case the very next day. As the guests take adieu, the judge rests on an arm chair and goes to sleep. He dreams 12 persons including him discussing the murder case and expressing views before deciding the destiny of the murder accused. The marathon discussion goes on and at the end opinion changes from guilty to not guilty appealing the conscious part of the judge to announce verdict that the murder accused boy is innocent. As the judge rises next morning, he finds himself a completely different person. Thus, the theme is simple but hooking one. The metaphors used in this Movie are also great.

The casting of the Movie is huge but there is no unnecessary character. The roles played by all are matchless. I strongly recommend to watch the Movie.

Lets break it out.

Pros- 1. Cinematography was quiet good it's has a very beautiful style of shooting that never happened before in tollywood.

2. The whole zodiac was quite accurate as in 12 signs with their personality.

3. Acting was good from every actor as you can expect from srijit's movie 4. This version of 12 angry men gave the charector more saturation.

So 4 starts. Now why not 6 stars.

Now cons- 1. The just use orenge and tile combo for color tuning. Feels very forced and kind of cheap shortcut for visual.

2. When you give a straight man to act as a gay they will do very over saturated hermaphrodite acting and that definitely the case. Every actor did a good job but still feels like their were more potential with the script and actor that left unused.

3. The overall commercial approach on the dialogues. No depth in the dialogue just slang. Yes though I found those slangs unfunny unnecessary comic releaves many was laughing at it.

4. No charactor growth for any charactor thought all the charectors' debate were in mind but it would be nice to see.

Don't go to cinema hall to watch this. Wait for hoichoi.

This is a bold and imaginative adaptation that stands out for its presentation, creating a surreal and visually striking experience. The film's screenplay and plot have also been thoughtfully adapted to reflect West Bengal's socio-cultural scenario, grounding the story in a local context that adds authenticity and relevance. The cinematography and background score are strong aspects of the film, helping to create a compelling atmosphere. The visuals are thoughtfully composed, and the music supports the tone of the narrative well. The film maintains a unique tone throughout, staying true to its vision.

However, while the concept is fresh and the presentation ambitious, the execution isn't without flaws. The direction and screenplay are the film's biggest weakness, suffering from overlapping, unnecessary, and at times clichéd dialogue. This affects the overall engagement and flow. Additionally, some of the performances feel unconvincing and forced, suggesting that a few casting choices may not have been the best fit for their roles.

Despite these shortcomings, Shotyi Bole Shotyi Kichhu Nei deserves credit for trying something unique. It may not be perfect, but it offers a unique cinematic experience that's worth watching for its creativity and visual storytelling.