Sex Sent Me to the ER

The content is acceptable, throw-away entertainment.

However, it was either edited by a child, or somebody trying to be clever. Each episode usually has 3 separate stories. Unfortunately, somebody thought it'd be a great idea to have a maximum of 2-3 minutes per story before switching over to a different story. It'd then chop back to the original, and then back to one of the others. There was nothing fluid or consistent with it. It becomes irritating and frustrating trying to follow each story. Additionally, there are too many repeats of what just happened.

If they just split each story into two halves it'd be much better and less frustrating.

I've watched 2 episodes, got annoyed, now I've deleted the series link and won't be watching any more. Which is a shame, because it could otherwise have be a good show and been scored 6+.

This show has promise but the editing is not good. I could only get through one episode. 3 stories in one episode where each storyline is dragged out way too goddamn long. I found myself agitated and saying "come on just get to the point already." The first time they did it it's like "ok cool, I'm at the edge of my seat." But then they do it 4 more times after that and I just got mad and lost interest, finding the people in the situations annoying when it's of no fault of their own, it's the editing!

I saw this show only once, and although the premise seems interesting and entertaining, I won't likely watch again. It's too painful seeing the same segments of video repeated over and over ad nauseum with perhaps an added 10-15 seconds of each story tacked onto the end each time the primary 2-3 minute segment is repeated. I don't get this editing style. If it actually gains viewers then more power to the editors, but it's losing me. I found myself continuously changing channels to find something more interesting when another repeat would start, coming back after a few minutes to see if the story had been advanced any. Often it hadn't.

A previous reviewer claimed it's not the editor's fault, but it's definitely the editing. If it's by request of the network then the blame may lie there, but it's the editing - perhaps requested by the network - that is likely to be the downfall of this program.

I really got a kick out of watching the first three episodes. It was funny, shocking and embarrassing and the segments were actually real but for TV they are re-enacted versions of what really took place. I'm all okay with that. My only criticism is the editing of the show itself. Why? Two reasons: 1. It makes the show hard to follow and 2: They do too much repeating of what we already saw. For example, when I watch one show, they do a lot of jumping back and forth between segments, they have about 3 or 4 ER segments to fill the one hour show.

One of the things that drives me crazy is that they keep replaying a lot of what was already saw which is a horrible waste of time. Each 1 hour alloted show runs about 41 minutes so when you factor in all the replaying that goes on, that cuts the show down to something like 39 or 38 minutes, which is crazy. For that reason, I'm knocking off 2 stars.

My suggestion would be for them to complete one segment of the show before moving on to the next one. Doing it that way would make it much more easier to follow the show than the way they're doing it now.

Idea was really good but I had stop watching it at half of episode. I just cannot watch even single episode this poorly edited show. Repeating and repeating same clips and explaining same things again and again. Just worst direction what I had EVER seen at any series. If this series come back with new script I totally want see. Currently it is just abysmal. Acting is not really good neither and some of content are quite surrealistic, but at this kind documentary it does not matter. What matter is that whole thing is just ruined so badly that I don't know how that editor and director even have the face to do that kind "job".